|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Suljo
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 ... 30
526
« on: February 05, 2010, 20:03 »
I found that but when you click on "read this first" button it says this
"Partner Program
You have the option to make any of your files available at certain Getty Images partner sites. Checking the Partner Program box will activate a column of 'Add to Partners' check boxes beside each of your files on the 'My Uploads' page. You can then decide which files to opt in or out
If you ever change your mind, you can remove any content currently available at other sites through the Partner Program by simply unchecking the box. Files will be removed within 10 days.
I think that means even though you opted in to the partner sites you have to still have to pick the files one by one. It doesn't auotmatically check these boxes
My problem is that geeks from IS steal some of my unchecked files and put them on Thing (I dont check my images on photos.konj). I am very scarry to do that to find the same problem. I will completely freak out on them??? 1. Who allow them to do that?? 2. How can I delete my images them from Thing.conj if they are not checked on iStock??? 3. If I wrote to them it will not be nicely to read and if I am happy maybe I will receive stupid ignorant answer within month or two which will dont solve my problem and during that time my files will be prostituted on their Thing sites because they have lots of open tickets (read "problems which they produced by themselves") 4. How can I trust them any more (they are not capable to fix reading TCIP data during upload proces for years and how then can prevent themselves not to stealing my images and resend them away without my permission). 5. How can I sue them for they ignorance and slackness? 
527
« on: February 04, 2010, 21:28 »
Finally i come back from hollys and what I see.?&'&&&#% It better for me and you ears to not say what I think of this new camouflaged mafia (yappy) yuppies who finally catch they childish dream and take over Getty public society. For now it is not fpublic society at all. If they are so smart in they moves why they dont offer us to compensate our looses of they outburst "miracle" plan. e.g. We are so stupid but strongest mixed up dog in park. So why they just dont offer us e.g. (lets take middle earnings from eXpert site per month) and pay us this value every month and they can sell our images from from ours Xpert port for they own price e.g. 100000 per image if they can, may, will or whatever... We gave them our port and all its clear. All the same we can upload at eXpert any more. They have our images on they whatever dot crap greedy affiliate site but they must pay us compensation because WE are subscribers and without us YOU will be simple ZERO. But NO. What they do, does and doing... Mixing our galeries from one site to another, closed one transfer to another.... blah. Why are my images from iStock on that fThing stok??? on iStock they are newer checked to be on this kind of Thing Stok and why are they now there??? On iStock I have few of them checked what are in that Thingstok there images what they are not checked on f iStock?  To ask support??!??(%&$??!? and eventualy get silly answer after 2 months IF??! I will after and "if they fix" ""glitch"" in they sys. what And all of this for again screwing us!!! People who are feeding you Greedy mafia plan in you for now non independent public state. I am not believer but hope that you greedy plan will bang in you nut head. OK This above is my little grindig about iStock (as usual) I can say that my sales are up last two months, Maybe really by coincidance to blind chicken buy EL (or may be It is ordinary glich for washing money between them). OK nice someone mix my ID number with some venal gonzo reviewer and money is still on my acc. THNX
528
« on: January 25, 2010, 19:23 »
Heh
its wired to me (access to forum from home) while on my job it was to smoothly that I dont realize that.
Mostly I looking forum from job but after month or so from home comp I cant access to forum.
I restart router, safari but nothing helps. I dont try to google forum after all restarts I allways try with bookmarks.
When try to Google Microstock group forum and after pressing link it was blank screen?!?
529
« on: January 25, 2010, 10:27 »
You dont read what I wrote.
In my files there are NOT any grids, there is NOT any objects, lines or forgotten dots which are not main subject and NOT any ruler guides so what I must to fix?!?
530
« on: January 23, 2010, 17:28 »
Hm
Strange rejection of 10 vector files in row.
Rejection Comments:
"Other concerns. Please make sure that all grids and any objects or guides are removed/off when submitting. If you can fix these and resubmit, that would be great!"
In my files there are NOT any grids, there is NOT any objects, lines or forgotten dots which are not main subject and NOT any ruler guides so what I must to fix?!?
Has any of you have similar rejections?
Before that I have about 90% maybe more acceptance ratio of vector files on Veer and on the other sites mostly (this ratio is normally same on other sites) but what the hack is this now?!?
What to do now? Wait few days and reupload it again or...
531
« on: December 22, 2009, 22:23 »
I suppose we shall see what happens, but I get the impression that short term gains are what IS is looking for now.
Short term gains. You may have hit the nail on the head there. I read some speculation in that monster thread that this could be Getty's effort to increase short term profits in preparation for a sale. Could just be another conspiracy theory, but it does sound plausible...
So are they go in one pocket, so iStock will have same fate like StockXpert now  or iStock will be as two left shoes to sell...
532
« on: December 22, 2009, 18:53 »
Eto moda malo preuranjena čestitka al konačno se idem odmoriti na desetak dana tako da ćete biti poteđeni mojih glupoza neko vrijeme. Sve najbolje svima koliko vas ima... Nek perje pijetla krasi tvoj dom, koko nek sjedi u loncu tvom! Guskino krilo lepeza tvoja, a jastuk meki patkica koja. ivjeli vječno u miru, sreći, nikada lave ne čuli iStokeći ...
533
« on: December 20, 2009, 00:37 »
I'm not a Vetta guy but I would say those photo's look pretty darn good.
Mat
Two years ago hikey images are cool with blown out shadows too... So what?!
534
« on: December 20, 2009, 00:32 »
So when is the last day to Opt out for that famous NoName site?
Subs on PhotosKonj are debacle too what to expect from unknownsite?!
535
« on: December 20, 2009, 00:02 »
I followed your advice and I opted out of subs, both on IS and on StockXpert. My content will only be on SS (0.36$) and on DT (0.35$) as subs. I don't want Getty to undercut my best selling agents.
Hmm, do I need to opt-out from subs at IS not to be at Photos.com? Or do I need to opt-out from partner sales? I don't mind IS subs, but I don't want to be at Photos.com.
I think that you dont need to bother up your self with that. Its only for files older than 18 month as I understood. In they first anounce I check that I was in and after that pass thru my port by oldest files with adding new keywords and so on and leave this check box for photos konj for images which are on all sites total out and accepted by iStok. In this process I find about 80% of my vector images that they not have any category which I defined. This is whats really disturbing me, grrrr.
PLS check some of youre old vectors and tell me about you experience.
From my side its look very strange like they checked out categories from my old vector files so they are not visible for buyers in they experiment year ago with best match algorithm.
I dont want to bee paranoid about them but this is very very strange.
I my POW they just cut strings from my Portfolio from buyers and boast them selfs how they are protecting exclusive members and announce them how are "deeply have hard and tough procedure bla bla..."
In shortcut of my opinion. They just disable branching of tree in they best match algorithm non exclusives?!
If it is true I really dont want have any "business" with them and you all know how I called them...
PLS check and reply my, I really want to know if I am wrong...
536
« on: December 19, 2009, 23:40 »
I followed your advice and I opted out of subs, both on IS and on StockXpert. My content will only be on SS (0.36$) and on DT (0.35$) as subs. I don't want Getty to undercut my best selling agents.
Hmm, do I need to opt-out from subs at IS not to be at Photos.com? Or do I need to opt-out from partner sales? I don't mind IS subs, but I don't want to be at Photos.com.
I think that you dont need to bother up your self with that. Its only for files older than 18 month as I understood. In they first anounce I check that I was in and after that pass thru my port by oldest files with adding new keywords and so on and leave this check box for photos konj for images which are on all sites total out and accepted by iStok. In this process I find about 80% of my vector images that they not have any category which I defined. This is whats really disturbing me, grrrr. PLS check some of youre old vectors and tell me about you experience. From my side its look very strange like they checked out categories from my old vector files so they are not visible for buyers in they experiment year ago with best match algorithm. I dont want to bee paranoid about them but this is very very strange. I my POW they just cut strings from my Portfolio from buyers and boast them selfs how they are protecting exclusive members. If it is true I really dont want have any "business" with them and you all know how I called them... PLS check and reply my, I really want to know if I am wrong...
537
« on: December 19, 2009, 14:26 »
so that's not a penis accidently drawn in the wrong place.
Did Suljo think it was a penis? Oh my....
Actually not at all. My first allusion was about missing Action and Reaction like on "improved illustration". On original image is only Reaction without visible reason why mythical horse is puking rainbow. Not like in this song. Sorry again...
538
« on: December 18, 2009, 19:14 »
I know that I always have different optics then they from iStock, but what is that? http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=155531&page=7look third post someone want to be they iStock T-shirt of the 2010?!? ?? First of all, they are angry when I called them iStock (Cattle in my language but is obviously that kind of animal is present on "illustration") Second rainbow flag and something on head suggest other side. Third this wanabee "illustration"!? They will never accept this if I upload something like this poor doodle and has more than 60dls?! Maybe little improvement in this "illustration" with stick man and rainbow umbrella on the back side in BruceLee or Chuck Norris pose in action of doodle creature will have more impact because for now we see only reaction of "horse" and third law of thermodinamic says that any action must have reaction or vice versa For my "bad tongue" about them (iStok) I receive few warnings and about 15 or more Ignore buttons for my "wannabe jokes" about them. Whats you conclusion in this case? Am I so wrong? Anyhow to not to bee so offtopic. I only need bigger canister levels when I started with them and for bronze was border 500 dls same with now they announce for february. In that stage I dont remember other borders because they are been so far away from me. For now I maybe few times needs few more uploads for my current canister level but it was not so horrible to wait day or two. Maybee they drop they canister levels when they see big drop (in Alexa and wee also in our sales while experimenting with best match algorithm) last half of 2008. to attract more submitters. Now they have recover growth from last year and now they screw pipe to old level. My only concern is if they dont dig or hide so deep nonexclusive images for buyers. Sorry if I was "rude" again...
539
« on: December 17, 2009, 20:09 »
Heres mine but only 3 years. Each year and than combine together.
540
« on: December 17, 2009, 17:13 »
Very interesting stats Tyler! Thanks for sharing them.
I have pretty much the same images on all sites across the board. If I had the software to make a similar graph I would be happy to post it.
You can download OpenOffice which is open source application.
541
« on: December 17, 2009, 00:33 »
Wow, you guys are in some steady careers. My husband and I have both found new careers in our 40s.
I was a waitress, then secretary, then a parallegal, then a stay-at-home mom (not sure if that one counts as a career) and now a photographer.
Hubby was a retail manager, then an electrician for 22 years, and now a teacher (of electrical theory in a technical college).
So I guess that's 4 or 5 for me already (if you count domestic goddess one  ) and three for him.
Lisa I love you story I came to this story like simple DTP operator and see in the 15 years that lot of misqualifyed peoples present they selfs as Photographer or designer. From that to now situation is not changed at all. Old farthers in my souround just dont belive in Yuris story of succes, while they position with they years will be as Jonathan story which is also too good. But they are even incapable to sign up to Shutterstok or Dream... it is "under they knees" of their EGO. Actually they are on Dream because of no review process 7/10 Sorry Jonathan for quoted youre name, you are my hero...
542
« on: December 16, 2009, 22:36 »
What is the case any how?
To bee iStock exclusive?!
err...
No chance even that!
If I continue with cons or noncons it will not bee suitable for you eyes, ears or whatever sense so I will be quite for now.
543
« on: December 16, 2009, 22:13 »
lately I included the keyword "New year " for some of my father xmas files .IS reviewers found these irrelevant and removed the kws. I wonder if they realise that Santa Claus is the symbol of new year for many non-Christian countries?
Image of Santas is only associated with wannabe "CocaCola" copycats as I can see... In illustrative bizarre illustrative sense are very similar and if somebody of iStock reviewers can show me difference between St. Nicholas, St. Claus or Father Frost whatever and why other exclusive member have this additional "New year" keyword in this holly crap thing which is approved? So if you are not exclusive you must have best lubricant any how for puking or for from other side. If you will gonna to comply and maybe expect nonsense answer after few months youre image will be maybe visible at Chinese new year. Marry Christmas too all of you, even to iStock and G(r)ee(d)y images...
544
« on: December 16, 2009, 21:11 »
Next step from Greed(t)y images it sounds to bee as(s) they previous from JI. "From now you commissions at Stockexpert will bee 20% bla bla because of our selfish greedness.... bla bla..."
If it is really going too bee I am really turn myself inside out of puking on them...
545
« on: December 15, 2009, 18:55 »
I think that the perfect gym
546
« on: December 15, 2009, 18:50 »
I also know one institution which desperate need our money send it at getyandstoka at payapala dot konj Sorry for offtopic but I cant help myself for this
547
« on: December 13, 2009, 22:42 »
Try to click some more threads from this forum and maybe you will catch some usefull.
If you are Great Gonzo that will not bee problem for you...
548
« on: December 13, 2009, 20:31 »
OK This post is no have anything with DeepMeta but today I find post on iStok under maintance which is talking about some fixing about reading ITCP data and needing reply of users (uploaders). At first look it doesnt good but as I see they are "finally" trying to fix it. Now I want to talk about it but I cant find they original post about that. Maybe I am coiled in my mind They are put this thread under carpet so it is not visible any more. Any how as many of you mentioned that I dont speak very positive about iStock but as non DeepMeta allowed user because they not have intention to make it universal for all users OS. This thread which I cant find open little spark in my eye that they want to finally fix they basic upload system (about reading ITCP data). Cmon iStock you can do it you are on right way or I must Moan again again and again. Also some counter about reaching 50 keywords mark will also be helpful. Keep on good work ist not nuclear science. Cmon iStock, cMoaan, kh kh iStock, you can do it... I just find post http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=152301
549
« on: December 13, 2009, 20:02 »
Hi Leaf
can you add "Comic characters" in Microstock lightbox for iStock.
THNX
550
« on: December 12, 2009, 00:59 »
I'm still getting good downloads at StockXpert, but having trouble getting paid. I have had a payout pending 8 days, and the last one was pending 8 days too.
So much for their "three days" commitment...
I think StockXpert good site for sell, but me like lisafx. I having trouble getting paid. I requested a payment form 7th Dec, and now it's over 3 days i don't have received payment form StockXpert.
Somebody like me and lisa??? What wrong with StockXpert??? I don't know  (.
I really dont know what you are talking about?! Payments are so normal. I ask payement every 1st of the month and dont bother with that if paymant will bee in 7th or 10th days before request. Pointing in 3 day straw is not helpful in theory of "perishing" company. I have much more delay in iStock payment than from Expert side. I have also "bad dream" but I think that iStock kick off our payment employees from StockXpert and make this payment with this delay. When you see stupid rejections from reviewers on StockXpert you will know that this "new" ones are from iStock because of they lowered canister levels and original reviewers from StockXpert are kicked off.
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 ... 30
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
