551
Shutterstock.com / Re: A Single $82.92 Sale on SS - Is It a Mistake?
« on: March 18, 2014, 09:42 »
SS if you are reading, allow sensitive use opt-out based on model releases or per image or something similar.
totally agree with that!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 551
Shutterstock.com / Re: A Single $82.92 Sale on SS - Is It a Mistake?« on: March 18, 2014, 09:42 »
totally agree with that! 552
Shutterstock.com / Re: A Single $82.92 Sale on SS - Is It a Mistake?« on: March 18, 2014, 08:08 »If you dont opt in for sensitive use you dont get any SODs. Not large and not small. Nope, SOD and sensitive use are two different things. I'm selling SODs even I have option out for sensitive use. 553
General Stock Discussion / Re: Getty Images makes 35 million images free in fight against copyright infringemen« on: March 06, 2014, 08:33 »
all of you talks about that like it isn't possible to deactivate your photos from getty?
![]() I see someone making connections with embedding youtube videos, but owners of youtube videos do earn money from google ads. 554
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Hold on to your wallets! "There are irregularities with October's PP royalties"« on: January 04, 2014, 22:15 »Of course, it's in the contract. And what about underpayment? Where is transparency in this? Is there any possible procedure to find out how many sales you have on, for example, iStock, thinkstock and photos or company can say their accountants whatever they want? Looks like stock photography need to be regulated much more carefully worldwide. Let me guess... nobody cares about transparency in Canada unless you launch a lawsuit? There are no tax inspection either? For example, some small new stock company have 1 contributor and 1 subscriber who payed 249$ for monthly subscription for 25 photos daily, for contributor they record subscriber download only 5 photos daily, and for accountant they record all 25 for every day, so they can pay small income tax and in the same time small royalty (expenditures) and nobody can check if it's all regular and transparent? if it's true... than wow... it is serious problem and one of the best industry for frauds. excuse my english cheers! ![]() 555
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Hold on to your wallets! "There are irregularities with October's PP royalties"« on: January 04, 2014, 13:13 »
and I'm not talking only about IStock, I'm talking about every agency in every other country. Even smallest companies are under laws of the country they headquarters are and if something isn't like it is written in the contract or some sales are not payed or even shown it's called a fraud or deception or misappropriation and it is punishable by the law. Are we photographers/illustrators some kind of sheep? It's not a question to you or anyone else. 556
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Hold on to your wallets! "There are irregularities with October's PP royalties"« on: January 04, 2014, 12:37 »
I do not understand one thing.
In every organized country in the world, with law and statutes and constitution there is something, excuse my English, called "work inspection". These people checks if everything is regular, or by the law or contract with contributors. Everyone can call them if questioning some company doesn't work like it is stated by the contracts with worker or contributors. I really doubt that Canada doesn't have these kind of inspections and that it isn't possible to check sales on sites like photos.com or thinkstock.com. Is any contributor here from Canada and what can he/she say about it? excuse my English, please. 557
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock PP has started for November« on: December 29, 2013, 04:23 »
Number of average daily sales are somewhere near October sales, not much less, but not a single sale other then 0.28c and this is very suspicious.
558
Balkan / EX Yugoslavia / Model release na Hrvatskom« on: October 17, 2013, 02:39 »
Pozdrav svima!
imam par pitanja za vas koji se bavite stock fotografijom dosada nisam fotografirao modele ali bi se htio malo okuati u tome pa me zanima sljedeće: jel potrebno imati prijevod model release-a na hrvatskom, odnosno na slubenom jeziku zemlje iz koje su model/fotograf ili je za stock stranice dovoljan release na engleskom? pravno gledajući, kako bi taj model release napisan na engleskom bio valjan u Hrvatskoj ukoliko bi eventualno dolo do nekih problema? jel potrebna kopija putovnice/osobne modela? moe li itko podjeliti svoj model release kojega prihvaćaju ove jače stock stranice ss, istock, ft, dt, 123rf itd... uz model release, osiguravate li se dodatno nekim ugovorom? hvala puno na vremenu i razumjevanju! ivili! ![]() 559
iStockPhoto.com / Re: [iStock] No PP sales for August 2013 (?)« on: September 25, 2013, 01:50 »
still missing 17, 18, 20, 21, 29, 30, 31
![]() 560
iStockPhoto.com / Re: I'm going for the golden choker.« on: August 31, 2013, 12:11 »
I would also like to hear davidgoh's opinion about his move
561
123RF / Re: Images in Pending for more than 2 weeks« on: August 21, 2013, 15:19 »
I have few files pending since 2013-07-27
562
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP Sales July 2013« on: August 20, 2013, 09:05 »Go to "Thinkstock.com" and search on your name -- first name - last name -- in in single quotes; that's it, thanks! 563
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP Sales July 2013« on: August 20, 2013, 02:11 »Livestock is great for PP, shows you what, where, when and how much for each PP download. I have downloaded LiveStock and it is great tool, I see all those stats, but where can I check percentage of my files on PP? 564
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP Sales July 2013« on: August 19, 2013, 07:32 »Not many, around 2K but only 40% are on PP sites.PP BME up 40%. Where can I see how many of my files are on PP sites, I am non-exlusive. Thanks! 565
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP Sales Anxiety« on: July 17, 2013, 10:24 »
First(and only) PP download for May, 14th.
![]() ![]() 567
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP Sales Anxiety« on: July 13, 2013, 11:27 »
so, some of you are reporting that pp sales has started?
I usually get 3-6 PP downloads daily (April), with almost 40% less images in portfolio, so if it has started and bug is fixed then something other is very wrong here because I still have no PP sales for whole May. 568
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Changes to Main Collection pricing« on: July 05, 2013, 10:46 »
wow
![]() same image: 02/07/2013 12:19 AM MDT Small Regular $0.20 USD 06/06/2013 10:22 AM MDT Small Regular $1.30 USD only submitting vectors from now on until they change vector prices. 569
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Creates First Silicon Alley Billionaire« on: June 29, 2013, 07:50 »I really don`t understand the People on this Forum getting hearts for brainwash marketing talk while others who demand a raise getting downrated. Whats wrong with those people? When a company we supply is doing well with the sale of our material we should get a raise. Pretty simple to me. best thing i've red here 570
123RF / Re: Were to find sold images?« on: June 03, 2013, 06:56 »
scroll down the site and check right side, "for photographers" -> sell images -> download (download stats of your images)
571
General Stock Discussion / Re: What does it take to make a living from selling stock« on: May 27, 2013, 10:29 »
easier way is to open google image search in one tab, your portfolio (shutterstock, istock, or any other...) in other tab, then and drag and drop specific image from your portfolio in the box that will create after you drag it over google image search tab.
sorry for my English, but i believe you understood. 572
iStockPhoto.com / Re: the END of microstock !!!« on: May 18, 2013, 05:42 »
looks like someone mistaken subscription model with microstock but microstock existed before it
credit sales are also regular in microstock business 573
Shutterstock.com / Re: Most Popular search messed up« on: June 14, 2012, 05:51 »
yep, most of my popular images that were selling almost daily are below my much older non sellers.
I hope nobody is messing with popular images like other sites do with their best match images. it would be terrible. 574
Shutterstock.com / Bugs at Shutterstock« on: June 12, 2012, 15:21 »
first of all excuse my English
here is the list of bugs I experience on shutterstock, I also opened topic about it on SS but noone seems to answer, maybe better luck here: 1. missing images from gallery (not too bad, they can be find in searches and can be seen in portfolio, they are only missing from contributor gallery) 2. no new images in darkroom image gallery stats and catalog manager (same images missing in gallery are missing in darkroom and catalog, and all images are approved more then a week ago) 3. image gallery stats not updated regular like before 4. keyword trend tool show only last month 5. most important and most sales affecting bug is completely messed up popular search, images sorted by popularity looks more like random, newer files with more sales are below older files with none sales, check your specific image that is approved in last month, even if you sell it daily it would be buried below old non sellers 6. relevant and popular are almost the same now, but I do not know how relevant works so can't say anything about that. but they never looked as similar as they looks now nobody answered on shutterstock forum at least to tell us that they know about bugs and trying to fix them, anything would be good. this is taking too long with no change and no answers so file that can't be seen in popular search will loose all chances to get back hope someone from SS see this topic here of course, with all these bugs, SS is still better then most other sites, but this is extremely frustrating 575
123RF / Re: Super Fast Review« on: May 27, 2012, 05:40 »
same here, 123rf is really getting better and better
|
Submit Your Vote
|