pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rage

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 32
551
Oh, same here, although i guess i dont post process them as much as i would a RAW file from my camera. Need to figure out shooting with a phone from scratch

552
I started uploading mobile stockphoto's while commuting, or during bored moments at work. And, I was surprised that sales started flowing in! Not big sales, I won't be selling the 5D yet, or quitting my daytime job yet, but it's fun to see sales coming in.
I'm using, in order of sales:
Shutterstock
Fotolia
iStock
Dreamstime
123RF
Stockimo
Twenty20 (no sales yet)
Thinking of using Eyeem too...

Weird thing about DT: I have between 100 and 200 on each agency (except Twenty20). But DT used to be my bigtime winner in sales, so I put all my effort in that portfolio, and uploaded about 450 at them. Sales (and views) were coming in regularly (not enough, but fun). So I made an extra effort and pushed my portfolio above 500 (37 now). Since then (2 months now), no sales anymore, and almost no views. Anyone else noticed this strange kind of behavior?
Luckily my iStock, FT and SS portfolios kicked off, so I put my effort there now.
Awesome stuff...  What mobile are you using? I have a one plus 2 and am trying to figure out if it's me are the phone that's causing all the rejections

553
Shutterstock.com / Re: Finally made it to the top tier
« on: May 11, 2016, 08:54 »
Sounds awesome, i hope we all get there in time.  Sidenote, how many images are in your portfolio now?

554
Pond5 / Re: Pond 5 review changes
« on: May 07, 2016, 22:40 »
Pond 5 has gone mad. Even with different upload batches they review them in one shot and end up rejecting 70% of the batch. This is when SS already has them selected and has already gotten me a few sales till then

555
Hello  Zalee, I tried to Google your Xpiks ftp uploader  but can't  find  it.


Hi HappyBunny, so sorry I didn't see this earlier. I just googled xpiks to find it: https://ribtoks.github.io/xpiks/
The maker is also a microstocker and he is very helpful if you have any problems. There is a forum to ask questions, there is also a thread on Shutterstock which he replies to. You might need a shutterstock account to access the thread:
http://forums.submit.shutterstock.com/topic/77044-xpiks-open-source-software-for-microstocker/

This looks amazing, how does this compare to stocksubmitter? Can it submit images? Are the keywords amazingly better

556
Newbie Discussion / Re: Howdy! *Newjack*
« on: April 10, 2016, 03:29 »
Welcome to the craziness brother. It'll be crazy, it'll teach you a lot, it'll get you a ton of bragging rights and might just make some money as well

557
Seems to have slowed in sales and review. Guess need to upload more stuff

558
Pond5 / Re: Pond5 do they review photos anymore?
« on: April 08, 2016, 19:53 »
The worst is the crazy amount of rejections after all this.

559
Newbie Discussion / Re: Howdy! *Newjack*
« on: April 08, 2016, 19:50 »
Welcome to this crazy fold. Hope it brings you a ton of learning

560
Shutterstock.com / Re: Am i going good?
« on: March 31, 2016, 07:56 »
I'm sure the endgame for all of us is earning more. So even the agencies (greedy as they are) understand that some money can be made through less stringent checking. Good stuff OP keep us updated on what works and what does not

561
Shutterstock.com / Re: Am i going good?
« on: March 28, 2016, 18:35 »
Relax people. Have to respect OP for learning something new, getting 2000 pics shot, keyworded, uploaded and accepted and then earning from them. I'm sure the quality and money will improve with time.

562
Yup, SS rejected a bunch of mobile photos from my last set due to quality issues. Istock, fotolia and 123rf seem to be more ok with them. Haven't had a sale yet though.

563
The best part is that they'll rationalize to themselves that many users did not leave, hence our decision was the right one.

What they don't realize is that many of the best closed their account and the rest will now think a lot before they upload. They moved from being the agency that everyone supported to the one that people now hate

564
Newbie Discussion / Re: codec to use for footage
« on: March 20, 2016, 09:14 »
Let me give this pro res also a shot. Trying to get my head around this container and codec stuff. And seeing how each compares with the next

565
Newbie Discussion / Re: codec to use for footage
« on: March 19, 2016, 05:35 »
Guess will need to read about this a bit more. Just need a small enough size so that the uploading does not take forever

566
Newbie Discussion / Re: codec to use for footage
« on: March 17, 2016, 20:12 »
Let me give this a shot. H264 usually gave me 200Mb+ files for 15 sec 4k clips

567
Newbie Discussion / Re: codec to use for footage
« on: March 17, 2016, 08:50 »
Cool, so which of these results in small files? And what codec will allow me upload to SS, Videoblocks, fotolia and any other good ones.

568
If you do the right click and search in istock it works. But it seems that you can't do this in SS. any help here?

569
Shutterstock.com / Re: Am i going good?
« on: March 17, 2016, 00:26 »
Wow, you are doing good stuff. Have been on and off on SS for a year now. 200 images netting me $1-2 a day on good days

570
Newbie Discussion / Re: codec to use for footage
« on: March 16, 2016, 23:53 »
The issue is that many allow the mp4 encoding which gives me much smaller files. But videoblocks demands an h264 encoding and it file size with that is huge. I'm using movie editor pro and still trying to figure the best codec

571
Pond5 / Re: Pond 5 review changes
« on: March 07, 2016, 21:33 »
Same here, pond5 seems to reject stuff that sells well everywhere else. Plus slow approval means i already have some sales before it actually makes it to the review on pond 5

572
Don't jinx them  ;D  ;D

What we need now is for them to start editorial

573
Very well put. Deposit photos is also one of those oft hated sites that seems to have improved itself. As you said hope the same for all,  it is much needed

574
I'm sure we are all trying our best

575
I've been trying out Magix movie edit pro for some time. Looks like a good enough software with all the basic features

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 32

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors