5526
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Are Your Exclusive To Istock?
« on: July 14, 2011, 20:27 »
5) agencies have the fork and the cheese (do whatever they want, mainly I am talking about royalties %)
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 5526
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Are Your Exclusive To Istock?« on: July 14, 2011, 20:27 »
5) agencies have the fork and the cheese (do whatever they want, mainly I am talking about royalties %)
5527
New Sites - General / Re: Is selling photos in the low earners worth it?« on: July 14, 2011, 20:02 »
some numbers for you, 85% of my income come from the top5
![]() 5528
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Are Your Exclusive To Istock?« on: July 14, 2011, 20:01 »
before thinking of that I guess you need like a few months and perhaps a little more to see what works for you, some portfolios might work only at IS, if you have some unique photography style etc.. on the other side their royalties % to contributors (exclusives and non seem to be going down..) but I am sure some will do a lot better as exclusives, try yourself first and see where do you sell more.. regarding agencies all top 3 agencies that offer exclusive have "screwed" contributors, year and after so upload to all, work hard and pray too
![]() 5530
General Stock Discussion / Re: Is there any more room for another stock agency?« on: July 14, 2011, 16:31 »I'm just learning but i think there's always room for competition... in the end there's always coke v pepsi yep like SS and IS.. not all the other ![]() honestly I am open to new agencies, I dont mind about uploading and such, there is one agency I am in for a month or so and curious not a topic about it here.. irockstock! 5531
Envato / Re: PhotoDune by Envato« on: July 14, 2011, 16:02 »I am pretty excited about that site actually. I really like their philosophy and their management seem very level headed and on the ball. Not to mention their site design is one of the best, imo. Sales are what talks though, so I guess we'll have to wait and see how they do in that department. you got me excited too as I read your comment, too bad we cannot see the "inside" of it but I believe there are nice royalties % or your speech would be different right? 5532
General - Top Sites / Re: What's your opinion on the fact that reviewers are also contributors?« on: July 14, 2011, 15:56 »
I kind of like knowing other "photographers" day (I am serious about this) but you havent add much about the "question" on this topic
![]() 5533
Cutcaster / Re: Submitter Stats« on: July 14, 2011, 11:19 »
my only concern about this was the lack of respect for me, that was the only thing that pissed me off, wish a lot of luck to an agency that is included on new stuff called voluntary code of conduct for microstock and other stock photo agencies.. LOL
5534
Cutcaster / Re: Submitter Stats« on: July 14, 2011, 07:33 »
I was kicked OUT of CC because of this topic
5535
Canon / Re: Canon 5D Mark III 3 - Rumor Page :)« on: July 13, 2011, 18:16 »I can't imagine what a Mark III would have that would make me want to upgrade.Better AF (faster more cross points), weather sealing (good for some people), flash control from the body, more video modes with higher bit rate, gps, wireless connectivity for viewing on a laptop while shooting, few extra megapixels, higher fps... lots of things could be improved or added to make it better. wow.. what do you want from it? just curious! I have a D90 and I am planning to get a FF so I am waiting for new D700 or this III 5536
General - Top Sites / Re: What's your opinion on the fact that reviewers are also contributors?« on: July 13, 2011, 16:57 »I have an opinion on this matter.I shall post it tomorrow.I'm tired and emotional.I need to sleep ! eheheh werent you the guy that sleep wasnt needed??? ![]() 5537
General Stock Discussion / Re: How much do you pay your models« on: July 13, 2011, 15:12 »This is the exact question I was about to ask the forum.. good job someone else asked before me. I dont know much too but I guess if you gave them a CD with pictures so they can use them where they want, I guess thats the job.. 5538
General Stock Discussion / Re: How much do you pay your models« on: July 13, 2011, 15:03 »This is the exact question I was about to ask the forum.. good job someone else asked before me. I have never used models outside friends/family but if it is TFP why would you pay back to models?? 5539
Shutterstock.com / Re: Slow Sales Day + Missing Images« on: July 13, 2011, 15:00 »Strange is that only a few people here have complained about this issue. It's few weeks when these problems started. And in my case they are very well visible in "Earnings from New Content" graph. yep, I remember it at least once but maybe this is the 3rd time 5540
iStockPhoto.com / Re: best match shake 13/07/11« on: July 13, 2011, 14:30 »you "seem" to know a lot LOL best match is used for what % of buyers/designers??42% LOL if so eheh we dont need to worry about best match.. thats nothing ![]() 5541
General Stock Discussion / Re: Editorial Image sale - % of total sale, worth the time/energy?« on: July 13, 2011, 13:58 »
last week I decided to give them a try with Editorial, so I have upload a few.. all of them were rejected because of caption, I wasted like 10 slots.. that was a crappy move, I should have sent only 2 or 3.. now I have one waiting for like 20 days.. really dont understand why it takes so long..
5542
iStockPhoto.com / Re: best match shake 13/07/11« on: July 13, 2011, 12:51 »
you "seem" to know a lot LOL best match is used for what % of buyers/designers??
5543
iStockPhoto.com / Re: best match shake 13/07/11« on: July 13, 2011, 12:32 »
best match changes everything.. how can you say it is only about buyers? pictures are from who? from buyers too??
if we are contributors and sell our pictures and the best match changes we will feel that on the earnings, of course the more you sale the more you will feel, once it might be good or worst.. in my case it never changes once I sell just 2 or 3 pics per day there so I cannot say much.. but I am sure it affects everybody it just impossible not to.. 5544
Shutterstock.com / Re: Slow Sales Day + Missing Images« on: July 13, 2011, 11:22 »
sales are ok but yep problems on newest once more.. seem to be usual now at SS..
5545
iStockPhoto.com / Re: best match shake 13/07/11« on: July 13, 2011, 11:10 »Shank, I just put you on 'ignore'.Can someone tell him i dont care he (shank_ali) doesnt care ![]() 5546
iStockPhoto.com / Re: best match shake 13/07/11« on: July 13, 2011, 10:46 »Shank, I just put you on 'ignore'. LOL I gotta do nasty things around here, everyday my ignore list goes up, on 13 ![]() 5547
StockXpert.com / Re: Thinkstock earning posted !« on: July 12, 2011, 22:07 »anyone have same amount of earning like last month? no, a little less 5548
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Milan Lypse 2011« on: July 12, 2011, 17:39 »A social=A person with an interest in photography can approach/chat/interact with members from Istockphoto content team.Ask for an autograph if they so desire Lobo is there?? ![]() 5549
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Milan Lypse 2011« on: July 12, 2011, 14:54 »You should really go and meet some Istocker staff/contributors if you live there.The content team might work for Istock but most are talented photographers in there own right and are so friendly.Brazil Minilypses x 2 (Sao Paulo and Rio de Janiero) havent you got that madelaide aint exclusive?? 5550
General Stock Discussion / Re: Are coins and paper money copyrighted?« on: July 12, 2011, 13:21 »The other day I included a US paper money in one shot and when I attempted to open it up via CS5 Photoshop the program stopped completed and told me to contact the US Treasury department. As a general rule to myself I usually only include less than a one third of the money showing- no stamps, and no modern coins (artists own the newer designs especially on the back of the coins)... got the same for some pound bills.. GIMP worked out for them |
|