(a) It's REALLY important to remember "ai" tools are based off of THEFT of assets. The biggest "problem" "AI" companies have is figuring out how to remove WATERMARKS. I.e., because they STEAL assets.
(b) It's important to push for/request with companies you deal with that you be compensated for the stolen assets. It's very easy to 'backwards compensate' people - it requires some programming - but definitely doable.
(c) Authors should be compensated in perpetuity, because the "ai" tools (goal) is to sell in perpetuity.

Why do you think that artificial intelligence steals things? The developers say that this intelligence is like the human brain. He is taught by the example of some works, but then he creates his own works. You also learned to draw or photograph from the example of other people�s works and copied them at the beginning. Then you started creating your own works. So is artificial intelligence.

Quote from: stoker2014 on March 04, 2024, 03:35

Quote from: SpaceStockFootage on March 04, 2024, 02:02

This AI software generates content in the cloud

This means you will pay a lot of money to the cloud and pay constantly for every video created. 
It will be cheaper for a buyer to buy a video on stock than to pay to the cloud.

Where are you getting this information from? Please provide comparative costs for purchasing a stock video versus generating an AI video.

My friends are using the cloud to create artificial intelligence models. They pay a lot of money for the use of computing power.
How much will it cost to create a video? How do I know. You probably think that all this will be free for you or buyers. 
I am sure that it will be cheaper for the buyer to buy a video on subscription stocks than to create it themselves in the cloud. I think it will be cheaper for the buyer to buy the video and on classic stocks.

Quote from: stoker2014 on March 04, 2024, 11:24

My iPhone shoots 8-bit video, although it was purchased in the fall. Yes, the Blackmagic Camera application can record video in prores on it, but I'm not sure that this prores is obtained from a 10-bit source.

If your iPhone is that recent, then you can enable ProRes and shoot 10-bit videos.
Now you learned another new thing.
You're welcome!

Is your application installed on iPhones ?

I don't need it, I already have the Blackmagic Camera app and have a choice of prores.

Quote from: stoker2014 on March 04, 2024, 10:56

Zero Talent, do you shoot video in 4032 x 3008 resolution? 

I have already mentioned that MCP has the capability to utilize the full sensor if that is your preference. However, it appears that you are not receptive to this information.

So, the MCP application took a video on your phone and wrote that the video is 10 bits. Right? We only have 10 bit videos shot in this application. Before this app, you didn't know that your camera shoots 10-bit video? This is not written anywhere.

Ok, let's assume that I believed you. This means you can try shooting in LOG on your phone. That's all that interested me in this topic.

1. The S24U is capable of recording 10-bit video.

Will there be evidence other than words?
I read the characteristics of your phone, I did not see such information there.

I discuss what interests me. And I became interested in how you can shoot professional video with a small sensor.

1. Almost all my videos were shot in LOG over 10 bits. Not sure why this matters, but now you know.

This is interesting to me. How do you determine the correct exposure compensation, and why do you always shoot in log? And if the scene is well lit.

This AI software generates content in the cloud

This means you will pay a lot of money to the cloud and pay constantly for every video created. 
It will be cheaper for a buyer to buy a video on stock than to pay to the cloud.

It appears that you lack experience in capturing and post-processing time-lapse sequences using RAW photos.
If you had engaged in such activities, you would be aware of the substantial data volumes involved, often reaching 100 GB.

That's not the point.
There is no point in doing anything at all on such a small sensor that you have and that is in other phones. It's a waste of time.
If for time-lapse you can somehow argue for shooting in raw, then for video there is LOG, which takes up little space and allows you to improve the dynamic range (for 10-bit video).
I listened to many professionals who compared log with RAW, but for themselves they saw no point in shooting in RAW. TV studios may shoot in raw, but not on smartphones.
Therefore, this application of yours is useless. Better install an application that will allow you to shoot in LOG.
But if you still shoot in RAW on your phone, post a test somewhere, the video was shot in RAW and in LOG. I'm sure no one will see the difference if the color correction is correct.

Do you know how shot to LOG correctly? Do you record your videos in a log?

It is true that the files are large (>10 GB for 30 seconds)

I'm sure there are few people who would be interested in this. Usually smart people just play with LOG.

The primary concern with stock camera applications is their tendency to excessively process and compress both photographs and videos captured using them.

The Blackmagic Camera application writes everything normally, it can also write in H.265. Bitrate is normal.
There are other applications too.
I have no complaints about the main smartphone application, because a smartphone is a small sensor and, at best, has 8 bits. Trying to squeeze super quality out of a phone is ridiculous.

Regardless of the hardware used (be it a phone or a professional camera), lossless RAW videos are superior to standard H.264 videos (and even superior to lossy 10-bit log videos) in the same way lossless RAW photos are superior to lossy JPEGs: because they encompass the entire dynamic range of the sensor (10-bits depth on the phone), without discarding any information.

Where have you seen phones with a 10-bit sensor? What is the sensor size on your phone? How many bits?
There is such a thing as sufficient quality. So, for most professionals, log videos are enough. Shooting raw has certain advantages, but not everyone needs them.

For your analysis, see below a separate comparison utilizing a Panasonic camera:
https://youtu.be/4dIZhupRN_o

100% lie there.

One more thing: the app has also the capability to produce 10-bit HLG HDR, 10-bit LOG, and even encode 10-bit ProRes files, addressing concerns regarding the excessive storage requirements of RAW video.

We have already discussed this before. You didn't like the idea of converting 8 bit video to 10 bit prores. Now I see you don't mind converting any low quality to prores. 
The iPhone records in Apple Log. If you feel like messing around with 8-bit video in Apple Log, you can give it a try. But I see the point in Log only on 10-bit sensors and no lower. Shooting in raw on your phone is a complete perversion.
It�s better to install a normal application and record videos with normal bitrates.

and sorts the keywords by retime keyword data and positions,

I do not need it.
At best, you can choose 1 or 2 images in your model. On average, everything it shows is not suitable. Therefore, your model should display not 10 images, but much more. That's why I'm telling you that you should connect to the search results on shutterstock. In general, the way your model works does not suit me.

 

1. The video you are talking about has a very low bitrate and size, which means it is only suitable for web viewing. This is not the original quality video uploaded by the author.
2. If a person wants to steal a video, there are many torrent sites where you can download many videos for free.
3. There are many sites where you can download unlimited videos for $16 a month.
4. In order to legally use of a video, people want proof of purchase, they want to have proof that they bought it. That's why people pay money.

i've stared using ChatGPT for keywording with great results - it gives many relevant tags i wouldn't have thought of. I enter my image description, then edit the results

I use ChatGPT only for bad content, when it�s a shame to throw it away and can be upload. ChatGPT tags are always bad, but better than nothing.