pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Anyka

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 38
576
Site Related / Re: Forum getting updated
« on: August 28, 2012, 15:29 »
I'm already getting used to the new lay-out and it's looking good, except that I miss seeing the name of the person who started a thread (the OP) in the list.  Could that be made visible please?  (talking about the recent discussions list, as I just noticed it's already visible in the Forum list).


577
Site Related / Re: Post Ratings. Dumb idea or useful?
« on: August 27, 2012, 00:35 »
Just to support Jsnover :  I'm on IE9 and I can't see it either ...

578
Belgium is considered as a country with very high taxes (average is I think around 38% income tax, excluding VAT and other taxes).  Income tax applies to all income from commissioned photography (like portraits) but NOT to income from stock photography.   Stock income is 15% on every euro you earn above 10.000 euros, so it's 0 for small fish and less than 15% for the bigger ones.  More fun :  stock income is NOT added to your other income, so my commissioned photography work falls in the lower bracket(s) of about 20%. 
Anyone with regular income out of photography is obliged to start a business, but this has hardly any influence on the tax %, it's just more paperwork, plus you might have to / want to pay an accountant.
... AND we have the BEST chocolate in the world  :)

579
General Stock Discussion / Re: RF photo in a contest
« on: August 18, 2012, 05:34 »
The answer is YES as far as the agencies are concerned, but many times the small print of the contests specify that you should only submit photos that have not been published yet, or only photos taken in 2012.  Also, some contests specify that all images submitted (so not just the winners) can/will be published by the organizers in magazines, websites or books, so I wouldn't submit my bestseller(s) there.

580
General Stock Discussion / Re: August off to terrible start
« on: August 08, 2012, 14:46 »
I don't know about you guys, but my August 2011 was extremely good, MUCH better than July 2011 and August 2010.  So if I compare this first week with August 2011, yes then I am down a lot.  This could of course be the Olympics, but it could also just mean that August 2011 was extraordinary.

581
General Stock Discussion / Re: Earnings in July 2012
« on: August 01, 2012, 04:38 »
Best July Ever for me, 12% better than last year July.  Excellent results for SS, Alamy and 123rf, slight increases for FT and DP, and bad results for IS, DST (again!), GLO and Canstock.  Rodeo sold zero, but they never sell anything in July, so that's normal.

582
General Stock Discussion / Re: If I had a time machine
« on: July 30, 2012, 14:50 »
Oh please no!  They burned witches in these times, and they would surely think I am one with that weird black camera-thing in my hands ...

583
General Stock Discussion / Re: If I had a time machine
« on: July 30, 2012, 14:35 »
If I had a time machine I would take my camera and strobes and go back to the Victorian age first, then to the roaring twenties, may be to the medieval times too

Remember to load your batteries before entering the medieval times, you won't find sockets in the walls! :)

Don't you think the time machine has got an in-built charger?  I'm not gonna travel with the cheapest time machine on the market! :D

584
General Stock Discussion / Re: If I had a time machine
« on: July 30, 2012, 03:30 »
If I had a time machine I would take my camera and strobes and go back to the Victorian age first, then to the roaring twenties, may be to the medieval times too, and take thousands of highres pictures (with signed MR's) without having to stage anything or buy expensive authentic clothing.   I LOVE vintage!

585
I'll certainly ask the man who took care of the rental paperwork - hope he feels important enough to sign the PR.

Meanwhile, I have visited the church for the first time this weekend, and it is BIG, HIGH and beautiful.   No need to light it as a whole, because then the models would be to small in the frame.
The ceilings are useless for bouncing :  very high, and parts of the ceiling is in old dark wood.  More bad news was a pair of big and ugly "racks" in the middle, with light spots attached.  Modern aluminium stuff that cannot be moved or used, so that part of the church I'll just have to keep out of the picture.  The altars (1 main altar and 2 side altars) are very usable if I bring white lace cloth to cover them (Ebay), the paintings are hung high enough to avoid them in the photos (good news), and so are the windows (bad news, I won't be able to shoot a model in front of a stained glass window).
There was an exhibition going on, using big white sturdy panels to hang paintings on.  These belong to the church, can be moved anywhere in the church and are large and excellent reflectors!   Good for creating soft light.
There's nice old carved furniture, but I'll have to bring stuff to clean it before use.
Have a look at one of my test shots at ISO 3200 and without flash.

The electricity is perfect.  Modern, safe and available everywhere in the church, and the fuse box is in easy reach just in case.  The exhibition used lots of 600watt spots without a problem.
The pulpit is in a state that it cannot be used (forbidden) without danger, which is a pity because it is a stunning piece of carved wood. 
So I think I'll be using those panels as reflectors to light the shiny woodwork, softboxes for the models, and 1200ws direct light if I include far away background in the picture.

586
Indeed, the word "efficient" could never be used when talking about facebook.  It is not meant to be something efficient.  Even more :  as soon as facebookers notice/feel you are trying to make facebook a business tool, you'll be ignored.  You'll have to be part of facebook, "like" things of your friends, comment about what they share etc. and not just post stuff about your business.  And if you don't like that, find another way of marketing.

587
Maybe I did not explain well :  I hardly get any direct business through my facebook page, just a few likes.  But my customers post my photos on THEIR facebook accounts, and these photos are marked with "Anyka".  Friends and family of my customers see those photos, click on "like", ask where they can get such awesome photos too etc etc.  That's what I mean with viral.  I don't get any orders through facebook, but many facebookers arrive on my website because they saw my portraits on their friends' facebook pages.
I keep my list of friends very local, because my portrait customers are local.  If I do a pregnancy photo shoot, I add the customer to my friends, because she's a potential customer with her baby.
You'll understand that I never post stock photos there - I would not like it if my stock bestsellers went "viral".  But the portraits are paid for by my customers, so they can post them anywhere they want.

588
A property release could be a problem, since the church is owned by the city, so that would mean a signature by the city council!  But would it really be necessary?  It is a public place, used for exhibitions by whoever rents the church.  We could of course discuss this here, but we all know the only thing that counts will be :  what will the average reviewer think?  Will these images be refused for lack of PR? 
I could ask this to people who send in wedding photos of brides/grooms in church :  are these photos accepted without property release, even if a large part of the church is visible?

589
Great cellar (look like there's lots of old wines there!).  It's really impossible to see that this was a paint-with-light job!  This gives me the idea to add a few shots with some motion blur of a moving model.  A bit like a "cathedral phantom"  :D

590
I have a facebook account, a website and a blog.  All 3 bring in business, but in a different way.
The blog is hardly read by anyone, but because it is part of my website, the weekly update of it = a weekly update of my website, which sends my website to page 1 of Google whenever somebody is searching for a photographer in my city.
The website bring in new customers constantly, especially for portraiture.
Facebook :  as a business, I first have a personal account there, and then a business "page".  As the whole facebook "world" does not interest me at all, it took me half a year to understand how to "behave" there, and how to connect.  Today, I post links to my blogposts there, talk about every new photo session, and they result in just a few likes.  Not worth the trouble then?  May-be, but I give my customers a dvd with highres photos + websize photos, and the websize photos bear my watermark "Anyka".  My customers post these watermarked photos all over facebook.  People who "like" these photos link through to my facebook page, and finally arrive on my website.  So yes, facebook is "viral" and has its merits for a business, though I think it has more effect on private customers than on companies buying food images.

591
I'm sure they would allow it, as all the expensive pieces of art have been removed.  Just a few statues, an altar, and a couple of old paintings without much value (and I am definitely going to avoid those paintings in my photos, otherwise I get copyright-refusals!).  However, I am afraid if I really start exaggerating with light power, the church electricity could turn out to be insufficient.  That I will only know on the shooting weekend itself, so I suppose I should bring as much light power as possible, and then start "adding" strobes.  You can count on it that I'll ask where the fuse box is!

592
That would certainly be a good option for scenes where the background is not too far away.  The church has lots of huge pillars, so plenty of spots to hide flash units.  You mention slave flash, I did not think of that!  I can combine the studio strobes with my canon flash units for the smaller parts.  Another good idea.

593
I know, those Quadras are really nice and lightweight, but useless if you need a lot of light.
I'm going to take a note of those reflectors, might even buy them and combine that with rented 1200ws strobes.  I'm also considering renting the Ranger series 2400, but these have slow recycling times compared to the strobes I have in the studio.

594
Yes, I also spread my batches.  If they're seasonal, like Easter photos, I even spread them over 2 or 3 years. 

595
A few months ago I submitted 1 image that immediately started selling well on all sites (especially FT) except Shutterstock.  It was one of my favorites.  A few weeks later I submitted the portrait version of the same file, only this time, it was picked up by SS too, though the landscape version is much better.

Though this is a typical case of "bad luck" in microstock, I would not even dream of deleting and resubmitting it, because (as click-click said), that would be a reason for SS to terminate my account.  Better 5000 images minus 1 than none at all ...

596
Not a bad idea!  The panels that are used for exhibitions in the church will be left unused in December, so plenty of stuff to hang bed sheets on (or my lastolite vinyl floor stuff, which is more reflective).  Anything we can bounce on will be welcome, as the ceilings are too far away.  If I'm lucky, these panels are white by themselves and I can leave the bed sheets at home ...

597
Thanks, that was a great idea, I immediately checked the few photos I have of the church, and I'm afraid I got a big disappointment now.  You see, it is not a chapel, it is a real early gothic church, and the lowest window starts at 3,5 or 4 meters above ground level, much higher than my highest light stand.
Of course, I could simulate your suggestion and put softboxes or umbrellas as high as I can in the line of the windows?

As for the theme: this is a unique chance that will not come again, so we will be doing several themes in 2 days, like gothic models, vintage religious themes and probably some halloween too (it's only in December, so we're still working on that).

598
That sounds like a lot of photoshopping after the shoot, but it's not a bad idea to shoot the models with a tripod in the church, and then shoot the location from the same position, same settings, without the models, with a long exposure.  Worth trying ...

599
1600ws is a lot more than I have, but my local dealer has Elinchrom 1200ws studio strobes for rent.   This weekend I'll be visiting the church for the first time (during an exhibition), so I can check out the color of the ceilings (and height). 

You say "high ISO"?  How high?  And was it for stock?

600
Wow, super location!!  Perfect for a gothic shoot!  I'd wear a helmet though, in case pieces come falling down  ::)

As for the time of day, I'll be shooting 2 days from morning till evening, and December is the darkest month of the year.  I saw examples of photos where a strobe was placed outside, to light the stained glass windows.  Great!  But I'll have to be lucky and have a dry weekend of course.
Can't show you any pics of my location yet, it's in use for exhibitions right now.

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 38

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors