|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - luissantos84
5926
« on: May 15, 2011, 18:33 »
Downsizing also degrades image quality
never heard of that, can you please explain why? I do it rarely if I feel that a picture isnt tack sharp (and cannot do it again) and it does look better "downsized"
5927
« on: May 15, 2011, 18:30 »
anybody contact them regarding this last "bug"?
5928
« on: May 15, 2011, 10:16 »
I haven't this problem with Dreamstime but I have with Shutterstock...
SS only wants the pure isolations and people! conceptual stuff etc aint easy there, at the other hand DT love all kind of conceptual pictures, honestly if I were you I would wait a few weeks and resubmit 
5929
« on: May 15, 2011, 10:13 »
hard to deal with contributors some think that p+ is going to be good.. other think that even with a little more money that isnt enough (and before p+ it was?) if we had a best match boost I cannot even imagine what exclusives would have to say! (and werent they right?) jeez lets all earn a few more bucks 
5930
« on: May 14, 2011, 10:51 »
what I dont understand is why they are doing this?.. they just wanted to buy XP and let "files" sink and managed them like crap? great job overall
5931
« on: May 13, 2011, 15:01 »
It is important to have a high acceptance ratio at Dreamstime, more so than the other sites, because it is a big factor in search placement.
really? never heard of it..
5932
« on: May 13, 2011, 14:04 »
This is the only line i understood from your post. Im figuring english isnt your first language.
sorry but needed to answer this one.. can you tell me what havent you understand? yes I am RUSSIAN!
5933
« on: May 13, 2011, 10:05 »
Nikon here but I am close to get a Canon, still thinking.. maybe waiting for new 5D and perhaps D800
5934
« on: May 13, 2011, 10:01 »
never enjoyed soccer but SS is now my club!
5935
« on: May 13, 2011, 09:51 »
I may be relatively new to stock but I dont agree in what you have said, why are exclusives not worth anymore? because of the photo+? you can tell tons of reasons but that one isnt relevant IMHO
I believe that now buyers that want cheaper files will still go to non-exclusives regular, if not they will pay for exclusives or non-exclusives photo+, e+, agency, vetta, whatever.. have the photo+ increase in searchs? guess not right?
Ok non-exlusives have a lot less "exposure" on searchs etc but I do think that regular non-exclusives sales are prejudicial to exclusives
Istock royalties for exclusives can be low but they are still a big step ahead no?
IMO I think you guys just want us to go down and down.. why cant we both hang out there? (and all be happy with the huge royalties they give us..)
5936
« on: May 12, 2011, 14:30 »
What a morons. They posted results yesterday, then added another batch today and guess what? Yesterday's batch disappeared. I do not even trust that they really post right numbers.
they dont have respect for anybody, now this is every month.. how is this possible? now we got only today sales.. LOLOL
5937
« on: May 12, 2011, 07:00 »
0.33$ from start?? it isnt 0.25$?? forget! you had footage before
5938
« on: May 12, 2011, 06:57 »
you need like 6 or 7 clicks (and not talking if you need MR) ok you have the option to keyword a few but it is still boring!!
5939
« on: May 12, 2011, 02:50 »
More sales posted tonight. Now my total earnings are in line with previous months.
PS: I have a payment pending since April, 28th. Has anyone been paid after the last accounting issue?
always nice to see a few more now in line with previous month, but why cant they post them all at the same time, stock is like watching a thriller! 
5940
« on: May 12, 2011, 02:47 »
my experience is relatively small but I had a few 8/15 EUR sales.. the main problem is their upload that could be a lot faster and less boring but I guess thats the midstock size
5941
« on: May 11, 2011, 19:24 »
5942
« on: May 11, 2011, 17:57 »
Eh, They posted new earnings for may but it seams to be reduced by factor 3x from previous months?!
YEP! same here
5943
« on: May 11, 2011, 17:56 »
glad you deal with it fast, they were SHORT but efficient!
5944
« on: May 11, 2011, 15:33 »
doesnt sound good, contact them again or better explain them once they dont had the respect to contact you and talk openly
5945
« on: May 11, 2011, 09:09 »
you have know remembered me of a song, thanks!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0OVpyvey4U[/youtube]
5946
« on: May 10, 2011, 21:43 »
the other day I have commented on another topic that I had one for 7 cents! but these last days some photo+ for 0.40$ a XS
5947
« on: May 10, 2011, 15:55 »
you are just INSANE (sorry but you are) and if I remember well you have 2k pics, how long did you took (or I guess your partner) you are talking about 2k pictures in a year and not 2k crappy or average pics.. 200 pics per month is very good.. I guess you arent thinking properly, come back tomorrow and talk, you sound a crazy folk talking about reaching 45k RC.. what do you think his Sean target? you are really travelling in the mayonese you might be doing well but you have started "yesterday" (comparing to other here) your earnings will drop like everyone is talking here
5948
« on: May 10, 2011, 11:56 »
from 1 day to 1 week!
aren't you mixing it up with another site? PM is indeed one of the slowest, average is around 3 weeks lately.
I do LOL I was thinking of pixmac!
5949
« on: May 10, 2011, 10:18 »
from 1 day to 1 week!
5950
« on: May 10, 2011, 10:00 »
this aeonf dont exist.. 20% grow is low??
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
