|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - vphoto
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27
601
« on: December 06, 2007, 19:42 »
I would not delete images. This image of mine that is not the best by any standards somehow did sell at DT couple of days ago. If I were to delete some images that one would be the first to go. But not now. http://www.dreamstime.com/chocolate-cupcake-image3370524vphoto
602
« on: December 05, 2007, 16:34 »
next time i will try to submit 1-2 at time. SN is at MS-DOS level still ...
vphoto
603
« on: December 05, 2007, 05:59 »
same happened with my uploads yesterday. I gave up after 6-7 attempts.
I use Windows.
vphoto
604
« on: December 04, 2007, 22:10 »
they want to see the updated image not eloquent words ...
vphoto
605
« on: December 04, 2007, 20:51 »
606
« on: December 04, 2007, 19:01 »
BigStock 2.4 times outperforms 123rf for me. Still 123rf is very close to FT for me, which is better than nothing as is at LO.
vphoto
607
« on: December 04, 2007, 18:01 »
Anyone uses Neat Image? Does it complement well CS2 ?
vphoto
608
« on: December 02, 2007, 19:26 »
Congratulations !
vphoto
609
« on: December 02, 2007, 14:09 »
My guess is at FT one has to have at least a thousand pics or more to make a $100 a month.
vphoto
610
« on: December 01, 2007, 15:53 »
Btw, I have turned off subscription option at SV. Why to be content with $.30, when they pretend to be kind of a midstock site ? vphoto What happened to DT? Perhaps the subscription effect is beginning to be noticeable now that the purchasers have used all their credits and switching to Sub.
611
« on: December 01, 2007, 14:20 »
440% increase and still <$100. I am a very recent microstocker . Delivering pizzas I would have earned more.
vphoto
612
« on: November 29, 2007, 13:24 »
613
« on: November 28, 2007, 12:24 »
yes, that helped. thanks, Pixart! vphoto Pop the photo open, scroll down - you will see "Your Gallery Manager" and an Ad button. From there, pick which gallery from the drop-down that you want to put it in. (If you have named/created your gallery first). Hope this helps!
614
« on: November 28, 2007, 06:55 »
I have a worry that subscriptions will erode the income...
vphoto
615
« on: November 28, 2007, 06:30 »
I have waited for fist QC for 4 weeks; after that i submitted in one week 12 batches (3-7 files each); they all we passed QC in 3 days after the last batch. Now again I am waiting for 10 batches to pass QC already 3 weeks.
Does not look that they do it fast, rather sporadically ...
vphoto
616
« on: November 28, 2007, 06:15 »
I can't figure out a way of adding my images to the gallery I created. Any one did that successfully?
vphoto
617
« on: November 27, 2007, 19:36 »
They also attract contributers. I have stopped uploading to LO, SV and FP, but still uploading to 123RF, i feel they have a future. SV will make it too, eventually, but now it is a drag to upload to them without FTP.
vphoto
618
« on: November 27, 2007, 13:25 »
Yes, it is just there more clicks plus adding titles or/and descriptions, removing rejected keywords, waiting, checking for ftp to finish (and sometimes fail, or a site no responding). All that time is more or less equal to 2 more photos taken, post processed and send to the big 5 from which one can rightly expect a return for ones effort. vphoto Perhaps I didn't explain it well.
You shoot two more photos in a session, which both have to have the post-processing done (which for most people is substantial) and the meta data added.
Then uploading to those three extra agencies is three extra clicks in your uploading application and a few more on the websites.
619
« on: November 27, 2007, 10:04 »
just using a timer disproves that. I can shoot two more photos a session, but not wasting time by uploading to FP, SN, and LO. vphoto The majority of the work is in shooting and preparing the photos. Once you have all your shots repaired and all the meta data in the file, uploading is a relatively small part of the process. Especially if you get your workflow sorted out from the start. This makes uploading to many sites only marginally more time consuming than uploading to one.
620
« on: November 27, 2007, 09:59 »
thanks, leaf!. that was the info i was looking for.
vphoto
621
« on: November 25, 2007, 14:17 »
sharply_done,
what should camera settings be ? Neutral ?
vphoto
622
« on: November 25, 2007, 13:42 »
I have applied to SX and got rejected with the message your images are too soft. The same images have been accepted at IS and DT. I do not sharpen my images. The settings on my Canon 40D and Rebel Xti are Standard picture. That automatically gives Amount 25, Radius 1,
Detail 25. What should I do to get accepted at SX?
vphoto
623
« on: November 23, 2007, 18:50 »
Unless brides would start wearing black dresses at their weddings white is better. There is more life in white than in black.
vphoto
624
« on: November 22, 2007, 21:19 »
with 290 images $.30 for a subscription sale. I am to put SV and LO on hold. Both just a waste of time.
vhpoto
625
« on: November 19, 2007, 23:50 »
It happened to me too. Some keywords were showing in Russian.
vphoto
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
