|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - luissantos84
6301
« on: February 04, 2011, 13:39 »
Their communication is not the best possible, but I guess they got it right this time. This is what I understand:
November sales: reported as February 1st + February 2nd
December sales: reported as February 4th
January sales: not reported yet
and December and January sections will remain at 0 because they will report January sales (hopefully) in February
the problem is that without contacting them we never know and maybe the sales from Feb 2nd wouldnt have entered..
6302
« on: February 04, 2011, 12:01 »
Luis,
What you see under February 4, 2011 are your December earnings. Everything is now up to date. December 2010 and January 2011 sections will remain at 0.
Thank you.
Darek
iStockphoto Teamthey dont even know how to express/write 
6303
« on: February 04, 2011, 11:53 »
Still here Herg? upload them! (approved or not) microstockgroup isnt the place to this kind of topics, actually it is just a weird place were negativism and bullying RULE!
wish you the best Herg
6304
« on: February 04, 2011, 11:27 »
Dont understand and never will.. You dont they tell what is Nov, what is Dec? Ok the last one must be December but why no telling?? jeez istockphoto, getty, partners, whatever..
how can we get 100 sales then 20 then 100 then 30 then 110... they are really just .... around!
6305
« on: February 03, 2011, 13:55 »
Of course they have the right. They pay the bills.
So when I pay the bills, I have the right to do whatever I want?
"Having the power" and "having the right" are not the same things!
You just don't get it. If they don't pay the bills no one has the right to do anything on the site because there is no site. Like the man said - Your right to swing your fists ends where another persons nose begins. Your right to post in their forum ends when what you post damages their business. What does or does not damage their business is up to them to decide. Their forum their rules.
If you work for a company, or sell your product through a company do you think that gives you the right to post anything you want on their bulletin board?
Does someone really need to explain this to you?
fred
LOL thank you IS for paying the bills and letting the website online (not that often happens) but heck yeah pay the * hosting so we can make loads of money, not IS 
6306
« on: February 02, 2011, 19:43 »
I got an EL on Fotolia the other day-- they got 20 and I got 4.60.
pull them a little up Ali
6307
« on: February 02, 2011, 18:45 »
the more ridiculous is that the person who did this has the picture (tons of picture actually) and wont send it back LOL
6308
« on: February 02, 2011, 18:44 »
Today iStock email me that they removed 15 fraud sales from my account.
All fraud sales are from December a month ago? Strange, it takes to long to find fraud sales. Not good at all!
long? I had one for FT the other day and like 10 months later
FT takes the money back too? jsut curious how other sites have reacted to this sort of thing.
yep two times here both sub sales.. got one at DT also
6309
« on: February 02, 2011, 18:41 »
Today iStock email me that they removed 15 fraud sales from my account.
All fraud sales are from December a month ago? Strange, it takes to long to find fraud sales. Not good at all!
long? I had one for FT the other day and like 10 months later
6310
« on: February 02, 2011, 18:23 »
from IS it is my first but have a few from FT and DT..
dont get it once I dont believe agencies will send the money to the bank.. they cover all fraudulent actions
6311
« on: February 02, 2011, 18:21 »
I dont understand why this happens.. Ok all agencies do this but I have never payed because of a stolen card or other.. the bank always take all responsability.. got two sales from December 24 and 25th (5$ total)
6312
« on: February 02, 2011, 13:00 »
From my analysis of the repeated sales blunder data from December, I'd say the current balance likely reflects my November sales. Now I only have to wait for December and January...
WAIT.. they STILL dont know... LOL Hello Luis,
This should be it for November subscription sales. I say 'should' as the development team is making sure now that they were entered correctly.
November single image if any and December earnings will follow over the next few days.
Please let us know if you require further assistance.
Regards,
Darek
iStockphoto Team
6313
« on: February 02, 2011, 12:31 »
they want 24MB so you just need to have pictures with more than 8 megapixels (8x3=24)
6314
« on: February 01, 2011, 22:23 »
do you have the money? if not buy it (Sigma).. I have a cheap Sigma 18-200 and yes everybody can tell me this and that regarding zoom lens quality, that corners arent sharp, sometimes heck yeah but mainly it does the job pretty well.. again if you dont have the money but a sigma, it will do great pictures also.. I want to buy good quality lenses of course but when you saying you are starting it will be good for sure you can buy a 50mm also for a very nice price and awesome sharpness!
6315
« on: February 01, 2011, 18:06 »
too bad the discussion between Elena and Sean ended..
Oh I have no doubts there will be more 
I was really enjoying, I guess I dont need to say who I agree with.. (when IS is the only agency that shrinks our uploading..)
6316
« on: February 01, 2011, 17:14 »
too bad the discussion between Elena and Sean ended..
6317
« on: February 01, 2011, 15:45 »
LISTEN UP, now more news lol.. jeez!
Hello Louis,
I just got an update and there are more to be processed - it should be able to see the additional earnings by noon tomorrow. Once this completes, we will process the December payments.
Thanks,
Darek
6318
« on: February 01, 2011, 15:25 »
2x less than the usual.. and my numbers (repetition) point to around 100.. AGAIN we are screwed by agencies, will it ever stop??
I sold:
380 pictures in august
384 in september
386 in october
and allegedly just 132 in november (and I remember for sure that the actual number - NOT COUNTING REPETITIONS - was much higher and in line with previous months)
Unless more sales will show up later, we are definitely being screwed - and it never happened in such an evident way.
It must be said that in some months sales were reported in two days, so more may actually come. I am not accusing them (for now) but I will watch them closely.
I just sent an email to Joy.
accusing them? come on? 3 months to get the royalties.. they can do whatever they want.. and getting a lot less than previous months?? they arent honest thats for sure! IS screws us, then FT, then again IS.. nice job
6319
« on: February 01, 2011, 14:35 »
$2.50...I sure hope that's not it...did anyone get a reply from Joy?
never got a reply from joy! I know I had more than 8 sales in november we could see how many sales we had for a day when that repetition thing happened! This is not just outrageous anymore, it has now become criminal! They have simply just stolen our money.
RIGHT! stolen big time.. Hello Luis,
You did not have more sales. The number you were seeing were multiplied many times, in some instances up to 30 times the actual numbers. At this time 20 is the correct number of files sold in November.
Thank you.
Darek
iStockphoto Team2x less than the usual.. and my numbers (repetition) point to around 100.. AGAIN we are screwed by agencies, will it ever stop??
6320
« on: February 01, 2011, 14:12 »
Hello Luis,
Thank you very much for your email.
The sales posted on February 2 are the November sales. You had 20 files sold.
Please let us know if you require further assistance.
Regards,
Darek
iStockphoto Team
this isnt true, XP, IS, Getty is cheating on us.. what can we do??
6321
« on: February 01, 2011, 13:10 »
I have like 5x less what I expected once it was a repetition of 14.. so or they pay them or then there is a problem..
getting tired...
6322
« on: January 28, 2011, 13:30 »
from Dec sales at PP they werent removed, actually entering this second..
regarding Nov sales from StockXpert again problems and more problems.. jeez, it is unacceptable
6323
« on: January 26, 2011, 16:37 »
true, nothing to see here, move along
6324
« on: January 25, 2011, 13:09 »
I am getting tired of this topic.. like I said AGENCIES must punish this, end of story
6325
« on: January 24, 2011, 22:23 »
honestly I think that every review, every stock contributor know this 3D pictures from ioannis, they are everywhere, it is like yuri models..
again regarding Air work I dont care, if agencies are allowing it, thats not my business, if I could control them I wouldnt get the cuts, so I keep my opinion agencies are the ones to blame
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
