6626
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Holgs Is Featured Photographer
« on: October 15, 2010, 13:30 »
Congratulations

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 6626
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Holgs Is Featured Photographer« on: October 15, 2010, 13:30 »
Congratulations
![]() 6627
General Stock Discussion / Re: Exclusive Preparations« on: October 13, 2010, 01:38 »why have you left Fotolia? communication with them? thanks Yep I see.. I was very pissed at the beginning and made a lot of things but nothing come from that.. I am from Europe (Portugal) and I have entered/registered with a US link so I am receiving in $.. which is a complete fraud.. around 30% loss ![]() 6628
General Stock Discussion / Re: Submitting to several agencies / Workflow / Keywording« on: October 13, 2010, 01:36 »
why don't you try it yourself, every agency is different, in a few days you will know what is better, I found easy to submit to the top ones! I just don't like Alamy, PhanterMedia..
6629
Shutterstock.com / Re: Intolerable cruelty« on: October 13, 2010, 00:27 »I took a brief look at the portfolio mentioned by eggshell. It's not terrible by any means, but I somewhat agree with eggshell that if these are recent submissions, they're not what I'd expect to see approved. But who knows. Sometimes I think buyers are subconciously choosing images based qualities of color, light and a certain flat, bland, safe look that is a bit alien to people who actually like doing photography. I'd certainly describe those images as bland, even by stock standards. Almost deliberately so. And oddly framed in some cases - again, maybe this what a lot of buyers really want. I guess eggshell was a lot nicier than your statment.. ![]() 6630
General Stock Discussion / Re: Exclusive Preparations« on: October 12, 2010, 15:22 »I saw this and thought it was a joke. I can't believe anyone would be contemplating going exclusive with IS now, but hey, whatever. why have you left Fotolia? communication with them? thanks 6631
General Stock Discussion / Re: Exclusive Preparations« on: October 12, 2010, 12:24 »First hello to everyone, I just registered my account over here.. looking at your portfolio, sales, etc.. I don't see why you are wanting to be exclusive at IS, don't have enough time to the others?.. I am sure you know what you are doing sorry ![]() 6632
Shutterstock.com / Re: Intolerable cruelty« on: October 12, 2010, 12:18 »of course not, I didn't said I agree on the bashing.. it is just a curiosity jeeez.. let's hear what he/she has to say ![]() 6633
StockXpert.com / Re: Thinkstock earnings posted« on: October 12, 2010, 11:50 »Is the forum gone on the StockXpert-site? Or did they put some place where I can't find it? noticed the same days ago.. is gone! 6634
Shutterstock.com / Re: Intolerable cruelty« on: October 12, 2010, 11:26 »It's hard to imagine what kind of response you were expecting with such a melodramatic thread title, help from the UN ? of course not, I didn't said I agree on the bashing.. it is just a curiosity ![]() 6635
Shutterstock.com / Re: Intolerable cruelty« on: October 12, 2010, 10:50 »
guys let's respect eggshell..!
New Sites / Low Earners / New Sites - General / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff on: August 04, 2010, 02:25 Got accepted two weeks ago . Snappy upload and very fast image approval ( within few hours ) . Clean and user friendly layout . Overall - very pleasant site experience eheheheh I feel pretty bad now... still waiting eheh 6636
Shutterstock.com / Re: Intolerable cruelty« on: October 12, 2010, 09:34 »I got my first "Limited commercial value" rejection today on a credit card super macro shot . Looking through the newest images on that same subject I stumbled upon this port - http://www.shutterstock.com/results.mhtml#page=1&gallery_id=434212 Sometimes there might be a "pissed" reviewer and reject a bunch of them.. Don't think too much, upload more or simple give up! I honestly feel that DT is the "worst" agency these days.. but sales are going good so why not.. ![]() 6637
Bigstock.com / Re: What's happening with the uploads?« on: October 10, 2010, 22:44 »
last week I had the same issue with BigStock, contacted support and everything was fine the following day
![]() 6638
Panthermedia.net / Re: panthermedia user interface« on: October 10, 2010, 22:28 »
I dont see how hard can be to implement a new submission tool... GOD!
6639
Shutterstock.com / Re: What's up with SS???????? rejections« on: October 10, 2010, 20:51 »
what really pisses me off is the difference between BigStock and SS accepting policy..
BigStock gets almost everything.. SS is pickier! why? 6640
Microstock Services / Re: ShutterStat - more handy representation of Shutterstock statistics« on: October 09, 2010, 19:51 »
nice job.. downloading Chrome
6641
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff« on: October 09, 2010, 19:42 »I don't understand the anger some of you display in so many posts. Any agency is at complete liberty to accept of reject any photo or photographer. When they can choose from the creme of the crop, why not take in the best ones first? That way it will be easier to get buyers attracted, something that will be benefit all contributors in the long run. glad to know that contributors have low expectations from agencies ![]() 6642
General Stock Discussion / Re: Next site to go under?« on: October 09, 2010, 10:50 »
Sorry but I would have to agree with Paulie.. But honestly FeaturePics isn't worth the effort so why coming back??..
Maybe it is just my crappy portfolio that doesn't fit FP buyers, for sure Paulie I know ![]() 6643
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff« on: October 09, 2010, 10:39 »
how about the queue order talked here days ago..?
6644
123RF / Re: 123RF Image Update Notification« on: October 07, 2010, 16:05 »it is absurd, how can I agency act this way?? they aren't profissional for sure.. one day 90% approval other 90% rejection.. come on! 6645
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff« on: October 07, 2010, 15:56 »Accepted today Nah, not true for SURE!.. I have joined on the first day so.. ![]() 6646
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff« on: October 07, 2010, 15:56 »
remove this please
6647
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff« on: October 07, 2010, 13:39 »
something is pretty * WRONG for sure.. at least with your port.. 6648
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff« on: October 07, 2010, 13:38 »Accepted today I have a qwerty and nothing here..! Respect the queue Peter, no answer to that? 6649
123RF / Re: 123RF Image Update Notification« on: October 07, 2010, 12:27 »
ONCE MORE!.. when will 123RF be profissional???.. is there a way to clean the queue without rejecting massively??.. it is * absurd, how can I agency act this way??
6650
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff« on: October 07, 2010, 11:59 »what do you think about the queue and all this time to get in?Buy a stronger umbrella! I frankly think this is hilarious. The most recent startups like Deposit and Veer-micro paid hundred(s) to convince us to upload. While everybody is dying to get in a new site that doesn't pay a cent to upload. There are more amazing things going on on the micro scene. DT lowers its commissions from 50 to 30%, and well, that's life. Istock lowers its rates from 20 to 15% and the roof falls down. yep it's true..! we have faith in everything.. I had more time ago, today not that much on a lot of agencies (which I stop uploading..) |
|