MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - stoker2014

Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 ... 52
676
Shutterstock.com / Re: You climbed to a higher level!
« on: January 04, 2024, 16:50 »
Can someone please advise me how I can disable my portfolio in SS? Thanks.

In your profile settings.

677
You can also receive money from stock agencies in the form of a check. Then withdraw money from the bank.  :)

678
Adobe Stock / Re: Account blocked - another story
« on: January 03, 2024, 16:06 »
image with a reference to "Disney" in the keywords.
And where is the violation? Adobe already bans people for tags.

679
General Stock Discussion / Re: This month's sales
« on: January 03, 2024, 06:42 »
December 2023 was my best December ever, and 2023 was a good year, overall: only 2.7% worse than 2022, which is above my expectations.

What kind of FAA stock do you have?

680
Off Topic / Re: Happy Holidays!
« on: December 31, 2023, 16:14 »
To everyone in this forum regardless of how we're labelled:  "Russians", "Ukrainians", "American", "Germans", "Israeli", etc. we are all human beings. And we all, collectively, document this era during a very critical time. A group of human beings who describe and document this era with photographs and clips. You are all very special human beings, IMO.
I dont know how it is on this forum. But not only people live on planet earth, but also subman, orcs and zombies.

681
Off Topic / Re: Happy Holidays!
« on: December 31, 2023, 16:11 »
The idiocy of the Russians is that they officially celebrate the New Year on January 1st, and celebrate Christmas on January 7th. In a fascist and Na.zi country in which the Orthodox caliphate is developing, such perversions are considered the norm.

just so we're all clear... celebrating holidays across two different calendars is what you found to take issue with?  quite a shameful perversion indeed.  you've got some strange takes, man, stay off the bottle.
You are probably Russian, because you didnt even understand what I wrote.  ;D
Again. All normal people celebrate Christmas first, and then celebrate the New Year. But the Russian orcs, of course, cannot understand this. For Russians, the New Year begins at the beginning, and then the birth of Chri.st later. Which is idiocy, perversion and indicates a very strong mental retardation of the Russians and their slave mentality and subordination to their kings and war criminals like putin and the head of their criminal church, Gundyaev (KGB agent).
Russians are genetic slaves and alcoholics.

this nonsense is exactly what i deserve trying to argue with an idiot.  my mistake.  happy holidays!
I didn't argue, relax. I dont even see a subject for argue here.  ;D

682
If this was violation, why do shutterstock owns bigstock?
Shutterstock sets rules for authors. What is possible for him is not the fact that it is possible for the authors. My point is that these questions need to be clarified from him.

683
Shutterstock.com / Re: Happy Reset!
« on: December 31, 2023, 10:16 »
In my opinion, the problem with shutterstock is not the percentage for the author. Its problem is the constant decrease in the number of buyers. Buyers are leaving this stock.

684
Hello Friends,
Can I sell my portfolio of 5k stock images to someone for a lumpsum price and remove it from my portfolio so they can sell it?

I am asking this question because I am thinking to flip my assets for urgent cash in return?

Thanks!
I heard that you can only sell your entire account with all your work. Your account will become the property of another person. No one will buy otherwise.

685
Can I sell my portfolio of 5k stock images to someone for a lumpsum price and remove it from my portfolio so they can sell it?

In theory, it is possible, but there are quite a few problems.

The person, who buys the images has to upload them again, which may cost a considerable amount of time, the images may not all be accepted again and they certainly lose their search positions. All these issues combined mean that you will probably get considerably less money for the images than you would get in the future by selling them yourself.

Also the person who buys the images would have to trust you that are no legal pitfalls in your portfolio and the images do not violate anybody's intellectual property.

I somewhere disagree with him.

You can transfer the rights to the buyer. You need not to delete that portfolio, just change the email ID to the buyers email.
The buyer also don't need to re-start everything, keep that portfolio running as it is as a separate portfolio.
And if the buyer already has his own portfolio on stock. Now he will already have 2 portfolios and 2 accounts. Wouldn't this be a violation of the stock rules?

686
Off Topic / Re: Happy Holidays!
« on: December 31, 2023, 06:23 »
The idiocy of the Russians is that they officially celebrate the New Year on January 1st, and celebrate Christmas on January 7th. In a fascist and Na.zi country in which the Orthodox caliphate is developing, such perversions are considered the norm.

just so we're all clear... celebrating holidays across two different calendars is what you found to take issue with?  quite a shameful perversion indeed.  you've got some strange takes, man, stay off the bottle.
You are probably Russian, because you didnt even understand what I wrote.  ;D
Again. All normal people celebrate Christmas first, and then celebrate the New Year. But the Russian orcs, of course, cannot understand this. For Russians, the New Year begins at the beginning, and then the birth of Chri.st later. Which is idiocy, perversion and indicates a very strong mental retardation of the Russians and their slave mentality and subordination to their kings and war criminals like putin and the head of their criminal church, Gundyaev (KGB agent).
Russians are genetic slaves and alcoholics.

687
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 30, 2023, 12:15 »
This is why it's better to shoot timelapses in RAW, process and export them as 16-bit TIFF
:o :o :o ::) ::) ::)

And its better to shoot video in RAW !
Do you shoot videos in raw?  ;)

688
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 30, 2023, 08:16 »
Why don't you try it yourself?
I tried it. The files have different sizes. I rendered 10 bit video.
The question is why?  ;)
I'm not sure I understand what you did. What were your input and output settings?

Even inside the 10-bit ProRes family (LT, vs normal, vs HQ) the output files have different sizes depending on how much information the lossy compression is discarding.
10-bit ProRes LT.
The first rendering is with maximum bit depth.
The second rendering is without maximum bit depth.

I took one source file and made 2 different renderings from it.

And both final files are 10-bit ProRes, right?
Except for the test above, I never experimented with that setting switched off.

I found this explanation, which means that the setting has a different purpose. Maximum depth means 32 bit for internal calculations instead of 8 (or 10?):
8-bit means the result of every calculation on the image can only have 256 possible levels per channel (RGB or YUV). Thats not a lot of accuracy. With multiple effects on a clip, this means well get rounding errors for each calculation, with the danger of introducing banding and blocking.

In 32-bit, were doing all calculations with results that can have more than 4 billion different levels per channel, so rounding errors with multiple effects are totally eliminated. We can also store levels way beyond 100% white and 0% black
.

So, it looks like that setting is mainly used for internal transcoding calculations. Maximum depth means more accurate calculations, not necessarily the bit-depth of the final file, which is fixed in our case, by the 10-bit ProRes standard.

Keep it checked. It may take longer to render, but the original information will be better preserved.
According to DaVinci, yes, both files are 10 bits.

I read your assumptions. But these are just assumptions.
On the other hand, how much space can 2 bits take up? :)

Media Encoder has an 8bit or 16bit option. They do not affect the prores codec; the files are also the same size.

689
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 30, 2023, 06:48 »
Why don't you try it yourself?
I tried it. The files have different sizes. I rendered 10 bit video.
The question is why?  ;)
I'm not sure I understand what you did. What were your input and output settings?

Even inside the 10-bit ProRes family (LT, vs normal, vs HQ) the output files have different sizes depending on how much information the lossy compression is discarding.
10-bit ProRes LT.
The first rendering is with maximum bit depth.
The second rendering is without maximum bit depth.

I took one source file and made 2 different renderings from it.

690
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 30, 2023, 06:24 »
Zero Talent, where can I read what stocks you upload videos to? Or you haven't written this here on the forum yet.

691
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 30, 2023, 06:22 »
Why don't you try it yourself?
I tried it. The files have different sizes. I rendered 10 bit video.
The question is why?  ;)

692
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 30, 2023, 05:26 »


Why do you enable the option to render with maximum bit depth? Your prores codec already renders everything at 10 bits, as you claim.
 ;)

693
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 30, 2023, 05:24 »
Unlike yourself, high end users and media players already know that ProRes 422 output is always 10-bit, by defintion. Period. End of line. No switch to 8-bit. 10-bit only.
ok
 ;D

694
Ambu: Thanks for sharing this.

Based on this info, Im not ready to contribute to istock. I will stick with SS, AS, and pond5 for the foreseeable future and reassess if needed.

I can certainly see myself change my mind with time.
You made the wrong conclusions.

695
These day in video I contribute to P5 exclusive , P5 non exclusive, Adobe Stock and Artgrid.



Not for me. I have ditched a long time ago Istock, Shutterstock and Videohive Envato
What stock do you have left?  ???
Artgrid distributes your video for free to everyone.  ;D

696
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 29, 2023, 17:24 »
You are already well known for denying the evidence, even when it is screaming in your face.
:o :o ::) :-\ :-\ :'( :'(

Probably because your evidence is usually not evidence.
 ;D ;D ;D

697
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 29, 2023, 17:20 »
Davinci is telling you the truth
OK. In fact I do not care. You are already arguing with yourself.
You think that Media Encoder creates 10 bits from 8 bits, okay, I wont argue, I still dont know how Media Encoder works.
Let's assume that the prores codec works correctly, the Media Encoder makes 10 bits and DaVinci shows the correct information.
This all simplifies working with 8-bit video.  ;D
Conclusions: There is only one program that shows the number of bits in prores, and that program is called DaVinci.  :)

698
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 29, 2023, 13:59 »
Yes, I learned something about MediaInfo, indeed. No shame in admitting it: it doesn't show the bit-depth for ProRes clips.

And yes, as I said, ProRes can also work for 8-bit clips. After upscaling them to 10 bits. All ProRes outputs will always be 10 bits minimum, even if the native file was 8 bits.

Below is the info for an old 8-bit H264 clip. Next to it, is the ProRes version obtained by asking Adobe Media Encoder to encode it with ProRes. I even removed the check forcing the encoding at maximum depth.
As expected, the output is a ProRes 10-bit clip.

I am sure that by using this cheat you may fool some buyers interested in quality 10-bit clips, but it is also likely that it may bite you back. The choice is yours.
+100

I think that buyers buy prores only because they are comfortable working with this codec. Also, the buyer can theoretically return any purchased clip if he doesnt like it. I've heard of such returns.
The author of the video will never receive any claims or threats from the buyer. All these issues are regulated by stock agencies, and on the websites of these agencies there are no requirements for the authors you write about here.
I also believe that this is a defect of the prores codec, which represents 8-bit video as 10-bit. Moreover, I'm not sure that DaVinci Resolve even detects the video bit depth in the prores codec. Most likely, this program decided that if it is prores, then it means there are 10 bits. Thus, most buyers will never know what depth of bits they purchased. Many video editing programs will also not show how many bits are in the video in the prores codec.
 :) ;)

You are writing about some kind of scaling of 8 bits to 10 bits. I'm not sure that this is even possible and that Media Encoder does this. You need to ask Adobe about this. And even if you are right, then so much the better, 8 bit videos will become 10 bit.  :)

699
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 29, 2023, 13:03 »
Wrong conclusion: MediaInfo is showing the bit depth, but not for ProRes, when the bit-depth is known by default (see below).
No, not known. You yourself proved that prores works with 8-bit video.

But at least you learned something new today. This is progress! You're welcome!
I'm sure you learned a lot more than I did today.  ;D ;D ;D

And this, I know that the MediaInfo program shows the bit depth of any video, but not prores.  ;D

700
Software / Re: After effects VS Davinci resolve - fusion
« on: December 29, 2023, 12:45 »
Zero Talent, I remain of the opinion that people buy your video not because it has 10 bits. But only because it is encoded in prores. Or perhaps just a good story.
 ;D ;D ;D

Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 ... 52

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors