Good mooaaninggg
I just wake up ffrroomm my wintterrr beearr timmeee slleep ssooo I missedd too see thattt arrttyyy farrtyyy cattlee phottooo off the weeekk whichh yoouu arrree all tallkkingg abbouttt.
plllssssss givvee meee ttheee llinnkkk offff thhattt warrmm laaadyyyyyyyy inn thatt gllaasseess tooooo warrrrrrrrrrmm mee liiiittleeeeee offff bittttt aanddd teell yoou abouutt myyy oppinonnnnn.
Maayybee sheee cooulld conceenttraatee reffleecttionss likeee parrabolliccc gllasses andd melllt meeee frrommmmm myy frozzzenn statteeeeee.
brrrrrr
ittss stiill too coold affterr deeep ddreeeamm I neeed it pleeeeeasee maayybee Ittt willllllllll helpp.
I yustt trrrrrry tooo findd itt butt noww onn the phtoooo of thee weeeeeeek iss twooo froozeeen inn thee ice yappiees and i feeell evenn mooreee coolderrrrrrr.
Gimeee linkk offf thatt warmmmmmm ladyy in thatt copyyrigtheedd glllasessss plsssssssss...
I allsooo hoope thattt fireemannnnnnzzz froom stookaa woouldnn huurtt myy froozzenn booneess and myy portt froomm searrchhh egggine anndd droopp myy foolioo in thee baack becaussee off my frozzenn oppinionn.
I donntt sayy myy oppinioon jusssstttt yet, soo donntt pushh that trrrigger soo fasttttt...
Pusshh afterrr I see thatt famoouss hot ladyyyy innn thatt glass reffllectionnzzzzzz
PLZ..... and THNX anyhow

Suljo,

Just a note: I don't understand why you always have to mention this "iStock" joke.

Regards,
Adelaide

I know evolution from bacteria to human is long process, but small things make people happy, but from iStock I dont expect nothing, even worse than before.
I cross over from that that they even more dont support ITPC or EXIF data because they make they system complicated even worse than Windows by themselves. They loose to much energy to fuck up with everybody in they chain list wich generate more and more unsatisfied users.
I understand that some people think that they understand and love complicated things but this is offull.
Just no make sense and any kind of taste.
Sorry if I am so rude but I am sereously disapointed with them.
I am the first for some kind of standardization but they are most unpredictable of other BIG 4 or 6 in acceptance process.
I just dont even think what they are think that they are. I Just send them by innertion in the same time just to see new stupidnes of rejecton or othervise why the accept something.
Just for fun
Sorry on my bad English, hope you understand.
I wrote my last post because I was angry of non user friendly interface.
After few months was story that trere is some kind of Glitch in syste so they dont support ITPC data.
They dont fix that jet and even worse make this thing from my first post.
Very unprofesional from company which are trying to be No 1.
No1 for Fcking submiters?!?
 

okie!

CAN A MAC USER recommend a free software of iptc Plss??? I am a bit confused. Sigh....I am regretting having a Macbook.

> My CD got eaten by the Macbook and i dont know how to get it out.
> My SD card reader cant be read by the Macbook and so my photos are not readable.

Anyone can help me on these too??

Very troubled..

I hope that you got you CD back after month ago.
just press F12 key for sec or two, or from any window behind CD icon you have symbol which is same on F12 key and press it or just from File menu choose Eject or Hold Command (Apple key) and key E, or just drag CD icon to the Thash icon on Dock.
I hope that you not kidding?!?
About free IPTC software as you see in post above is program named PREVIEW and you have it on you machine allready installed.

I guess stock got lots of meanings in English: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_(disambiguation)

Er...
In my language iStock means Cattle, so I dont know if this Packy or Army girl whatever trying to find, maybe Livestock?!?
and with X word it is very tricky. Well IMO maybe we must redirect her to the iSTOCK, she will have more sucess on that site.
As she says: " distance or colour and other things does not matter..."
 

I told my thinking about iStock (which they name in my language is very close symbolism to Cattle, and with letter "i" in front means internet Cattle).
Thinking hmmm like Clint Eastwood says ...... about thinking or oppinion.
Last 2 years I dont expect anything positive news from them as nonexclusive contributor and with more and more uploads my stats are going down (on other sites are in positive growing trend).
I just dont like to sign my name like exclusive Cattle members on shoes how somebody will be able to recognize me by reading my name from my shoes while I am in the * of somebody which name means Cattle!!!
My best Christmas wishes for iStock (iCattle) is to drop down or bankrupt fastest with this kind of they "nepotism business"
Look at the bright side of life...........MP not at the cattle side of life.
 

Hi All,

 To answer the original question. NO! My favorite I get over and over is is my image has been upsized. I am shooting on a 22 megapixel camera. Upsizing?. We start every image in Raw as a 100 mg. 16-bit Tiff and down size from there for Micro. Getty has rarely rejected one of our 50 mg. images for technical reasons in 10 years. I get 30% rejects at Istock.
 Voicing your problems in clear terms is the best way to help communicate your message. There are important people reading these sites the more clear and concise the letters the better the chance for having the issue addressed.
Wow
thats I talk about in most of my dirty posts that IS has inconsistent kind of revjuvering. In one hand you can nor reach them with sharp big and simple things, and on the other hand they accept things which are for bluke, mabe for exclusives only???
I work for snoby agency which for nooble reasons but they are buying images from getty and I must tell you that this images is out off all standards.
If that revievers from IS are so clever why they dont go to Getty, they will find there lots of alien stuff on crappy images from glorified photographers for no reason, only because they sneakers are little visible from their ass with little name on it, but its not because they images are OVERFILTERED, OVERUSED NOISE PROGRAMS, ISOLATIONS CONTAINS STRAY OR BLUR AREAS and ALL crap on which I am smiling when I got rejection from IS. Forgive me if I am to rude but most of Getty photographers if they come in hands of IS revievers, hm some of them will kill himself if this kind of creatures of revievers will deciding of their lives.
 

The end of world is coming...
I dont know how was the formation of stars, or some new reviewer looks at my pic, Obama comes to be president, or Appollo 11 lands on Moon... but my photo of isolated Boxing gloves was APPROVED
- 1st scarry thing is that I have no "name it luck" with uploading Isolated objects (about 30% of success), on Clipping path images I think that percentage is 10 or 20%. For that reason I dont define on my keywords that file is ISOLATED with clipping path.
Any how I am doing my job with that around 10 maybe 15 years. My first Photoshop was before 2.0 which hasnt Canvas size or rotate for few degrees, maybe 90 CW or 90 CCW
OK stop with my brag, I only work this things about isolation for ELLE, Story, Elle Decor and few other less known magazines for about more than 5 years.
2nd I have 8 images in pending before that so it is logical that my new uploaded image will bee reviewed last.
3th scarry and unusual thing is that in my acceptance mail below general template words that how my image is approved there was ADDITIONAL APPROVAL NOTE
The following keywords used for this file do not appear to be fully relevant to the subject.
(Protective Workwear (Clothing)
What is OK. When I read that thing I dont belive what I am read. Is it possible that some of reviewer is human? He or she dont fckoff me up because I post ONE or TWO unproper or bad keyword???
This day I must remind in my reminder. In other words miracle happens?!?
As you see for me as not native english speaker that is (for side of IS) cool gesture I hope thats not happened by accident or nonloosed humanity of new rewiewer.
- I hope that my opinion will read IS spys and finnaly sugest to they headquoters to do simple things which will be in mutually interest without loosing both nervs, resources, bandwith, time and power on the minor things.
For now I will not talking of very THIN line between oversaturated images and flat dull colors, stray areas which are too blured or too spiked because I see lot of images from Getty and IS on 100% view which are deserved to do lobotomy for reviewers which approved this.
For now lets stay on this minor thing what happens to me on my 3th point - dont fuck contributors for one or two bad keyword...
Is it too much???

For me this like like you learn monkey to wash potatos and they are washing them but they dont know why. Anyhow the kids of monkey learn that from they parents but still dont understand why they are doing that.
I think that iStock revievers are looking too much from point of view of horse glases and dont know what the world looking around them. Maybe they are payed much better if they have bigger amount of rejections but they dont reject all images from you because in this case iStock will not have any earnings from you if that directed horses reject all of you uploaded images, so they allways balanced that they approved between 50-60% of youre uploads (in my case because I dont shooting people because of old Stalin reason- "Peoples means problem - No peoples No problem". I understand that what I am shooting can shut everybody, but with that kind of photos I have over 95% acceptance ratio on the other "Big" microstok agencies + on Alamy)
For them it is steady income for iStock headquoters is sensibly growth of they portfolio.
I am scared if getty will by jupiter and other and other agency an if getty has same Pain in the ass method like iStock that will be very bad.
Why dog lick his balls? because he can...

Heh
If you see I am very upset, angry, .... (+50 very bad feelings and bad things about IS...)
Yes but why?
Maybe if I am buyer that is all OK but if you on the other side why that "superior, megaturbo super system" dont work for contributors in same way???
All complains about iStock are about that. Fck authors in all possible way for all kind of stupid triviality!?!
Why and for what? iStock in this way in quota protecting they newbee loosers as exclusive members??? Or programes have impotence or inability to solve that mutually simple thing???

If you feel you're wasting your time, then don't submit there. Problem solved. No more bad days.

One day I will buy iStock just to turn it off for ever then will problem be solved.
 

How do you think that iStock Cattle assholes have better Alexa ranking than other stock sites. Simple by stupid rejections and authors make that click rankings by their rejections while they try to correct stupid thing by they side.
 

Yes
really pain in the ass for few bux.