726
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStockphoto Relaunch Sept. 17, 2013
« on: September 17, 2013, 05:53 »
Did they do this to go along with SS "iStuck." Ad? Sorry couldn't help the logo is good :-)
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 726
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStockphoto Relaunch Sept. 17, 2013« on: September 17, 2013, 05:53 »
Did they do this to go along with SS "iStuck." Ad? Sorry couldn't help the logo is good :-)
727
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStockphoto Relaunch Sept. 17, 2013« on: September 16, 2013, 19:39 »
I like it as the photo part was way to limiting and not inclusive of all that iStock offers, the Getty Images brand actually worries me because buyers will always equate Getty with $$$. Nothing earth shattering here but a good move
728
General Stock Discussion / Re: top 5 video sites« on: September 13, 2013, 11:48 »
Fotolia rates are horrid for subs not so bad if you are opted out of subs, still on the fence about that one.
729
General Stock Discussion / Re: top 5 video sites« on: September 13, 2013, 11:29 »
Thanks, Hey nothing ventured nothing gained! I feel this is the right move now and if not I will go back to being exclusive! I was in line to drop an RC level at this rate so I am not willing to take a pay cut on top of lower sales! I will let you know how it all goes :-)
730
General Stock Discussion / Re: top 5 video sites« on: September 13, 2013, 05:09 »
Thanks, It makes sense at this point with my iStock earnings so low. I can always go back if I need to, I am looking forward to the new future ahead!
731
General Stock Discussion / Re: top 5 video sites« on: September 13, 2013, 03:44 »
I just dropped my exclusive status for video at iStock. So for me it will be SS, Pond5, iStock, Fotoila, Getty and maybe a few others over time. When iStock is this slow it is good to have content spread out to absorb the slow times
732
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty revenue declining: Shutterstock and Fotolia to blame« on: September 12, 2013, 18:43 »
While Getty is trying to find different ways to license photos like youtube ads ShutterStock is find customers who actually buy video's and images. How about plain old fashioned selling of our work instead of new ways to shaft the artist with pennies for views garbage!
733
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty revenue declining: Shutterstock and Fotolia to blame« on: September 11, 2013, 14:20 »
Dear Getty,
You destroyed the community spirit at iStock. You yanked customers around with prices and raised them to high to fast. You kicked out one of your most helpful artist, remember Sean? You mocked us when we said sales are slipping and you said all is good.You are not up front and honest with how you did cash prices. Now take all the artist you shafted and their collective blogs and the forums they visit like this one and there you have it, business is not booming anymore. It's not your site!! iStock was doing just fine before your so called great changes for the customer! Stop blaming SS and site design for your own demise because you did this to yourself! Now Drop RC's pay a decent % to the artist... oh did you realized a lot of artist were buyers as well or maybe they knew a lot of buyers? SS has content and buyers don't care who owns it! they advertise on podcast and in the mail. They don't call my house offering me credits! they advertise in other countries and are pushing forward with their brand! Now you can figure it out can't you? 734
iStockPhoto.com / Re: What are you doing about istock?« on: September 10, 2013, 10:28 »
Weekly how about daily
![]() 735
iStockPhoto.com / Re: What are you doing about istock?« on: September 10, 2013, 10:08 »
No inside information but if you have read all the iStock News letters you can see something is going to happen with search soon. It may be to little to late and I am only guessing. I just need someone to hold my hand while I jump
![]() 736
iStockPhoto.com / Re: What are you doing about istock?« on: September 10, 2013, 09:57 »
something strange is in the pipes for the middle of this month, you are probably right in that the writing is already on the wall and I need to jump. I am just being a chicken because I do this full-time and have a family to feed. I just need a little encouragement
![]() 737
iStockPhoto.com / Re: What are you doing about istock?« on: September 10, 2013, 08:09 »
They are making this choice really easy for me at the moment, giving them a few more days and them bye, bye if things don't improve greatly on the video side!
738
General - Stock Video / Re: Wanting to Purchase Stock Video Copyright« on: September 09, 2013, 09:38 »
usually more than 5k a month :-)
739
General - Stock Video / Re: Wanting to Purchase Stock Video Copyright« on: September 09, 2013, 08:57 »740
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty revenue declining: Shutterstock and Fotolia to blame« on: September 06, 2013, 11:43 »
Plan B in the works
741
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty revenue declining: Shutterstock and Fotolia to blame« on: September 05, 2013, 17:43 »
iStock website looks fine, what they offer customers is good how they treat artist is bad, they have made so many short term gain moves and now it is catching up. I will be thrilled for a turn around but I have to plan as if it won't happen
742
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty revenue declining: Shutterstock and Fotolia to blame« on: September 05, 2013, 11:09 »
I am on life support could you please hurry!
743
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty revenue declining: Shutterstock and Fotolia to blame« on: September 05, 2013, 11:01 »
oooh Yuri could you please plug the hole on the Titanic!
744
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty revenue declining: Shutterstock and Fotolia to blame« on: September 05, 2013, 10:59 »
So it looks like they were expecting an up swing in the third quarter but Moody doesn't agree. I have to agree with Moody here as I have never seen a company run so poorly as GettyImages. I mean they don't even have to create the content all they have to do is sell it and not shaft the artist at the same time. Fire the management and start over I say!
745
Stocksy / Re: Stocksy - where are they?« on: September 04, 2013, 05:37 »
It is great to hear that Stocksy is growing! Even if I am not there now it gives me something to work towards! I really hope Stocksy blows all the others out of the water because they treat the artist fair. So happy to hear some good news from them!
746
Photo Critique / Re: Stocksy rejection: Portfolio critique please« on: September 03, 2013, 06:04 »
Amazing work! I have no clue as to why they didn't want you, dang...
747
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IS Newsletter - A collection of excuses« on: August 30, 2013, 09:19 »
Bugga
748
General Stock Discussion / Great Watch For Creatives!« on: August 29, 2013, 10:58 »
Worth your time as a creative!
749
iStockPhoto.com / Re: What are you doing about istock?« on: August 25, 2013, 17:36 »
I have been exclusive with iStock since 2006. I still like iStock and hope they can make it. To me iStock did not understand the market and that a lot of small buyers were artist as well. When KT started yanking us around things started to go south. SS jumped at the chance and now you have the current situation.
750
General Stock Discussion / Re: ISTOCK - HALF OF IMAGES FOR HALF PRICE!!!« on: August 21, 2013, 08:23 »
This made me laugh
Hey iStock (whoever might listen), I really shouldn't care, but you are paying the marketing out of the 70% you keep from the revenue of my images. Today I stumbled upon a new ad on a German website: istock_ad I am really confused now. It says in bad or at least ambiguous German that "1/2 of the files do cost 1/2 times more (!) forever" which I understand as "we have raised the prices for 50% of our images by 50%" (at least that is my understanding as a native German speaker). I don't think that this is intended |
|