pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dragonblade

Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33
726
Baldricks, I didn't mean any disrespect. Just that I would like to keep this image hidden away from public view at this present time.

727
Sure it would demonstrate tension.  You can see the water clinging to the straw as well as to the sides of the glass. 

Woops, I stand corrected. Though it's not as dramatic as my image in regards to demonstrating these scientific principles. Sure, my photo may not have the same level of interest or appeal to everyone. We're all individuals with different tastes and you can't please everyone. Though I will say one thing - in all my 20+ years of photography, I can't recall ever being as lucky as I was with this image.

728
I'm going to guess this image isn't really as interesting as you think it is, and probably isn't worth the trouble.  A straw in a glass of water would demonstrate both surface tension and refraction.

Well you guessed wrong. Other people have seen this image and I can assure you that it's a lot more interesting than a photo of a straw in a glass of water (which by the way would only demonstrate refraction - not surface tension.) If the straw is sitting passively in the water, the surface tension is not being visibly disturbed. And I'm not going to fall for your trap by posting the image here. It's not available on the internet at this current time.

729
The BBC doesn't necessarily pay high prices

No surprises there. The BBC once contacted me through youtube - asking me if they could use one of my videos for a childrens TV show. They wanted the footage for free. Not only that but they wanted me to sign away my rights to the footage to them. Glad I didn't do business with them on that occasion. And that's not an isolated incident. Ive heard of other instances of the BBC asking other people for free use of their footage. And on those occasions, the video shooters rightfully refused.

730
It is up to you, but I do believe in supporting science, so I would place images like these on the micros.

I do get great satisfaction out of my images being used for education, particularly science. Ive got a cousin who is a teacher and she has shown some of my time lapse videos to students in a classroom environment. Yea I guess I could reconsider the micros.

Just for info, Science Photo Library is the BBC's, so it's a prestigious agency and presumably supplies material to BBC science programmes and stories, as well as for general use.

Oh cool. Definitely worth looking into. Just wondering if you have to be exclusive with them (just found some contributor info - I'll start reading.)

731
I looked into this a little bit a while ago - it seems most sites want a hundred or more images to start with.

Oh darn, I didn't realise that. I hope there are some exceptions. Most of my images that I intend on selling have gone into microstock already.

732
Ever thought of submitting to the Science Photo Library?

http://www.sciencephoto.com/


Interesting website. I haven't come across these guys before. I note that they deal with RF images though what are their pay rates like compared to microstock? I couldn't see any prices.

I admit I am a bit reluctant about selling this image as RF.

733
I'm a contributor that submits photos to a few microstock sites like SS, DT, Fotolia etc. At present, I have pretty small portfolios on all of them but they are growing. I have a photograph which I have not uploaded as yet and in my view, it is kind of special. It demonstrates two principles of physics - water surface tension and refraction. Now there are many photographs where you can see refraction - they are very common. Though there doesn't seem to be too many photographs that show surface tension being disrupted in the way that I have captured. There are such images out there but there doesn't seem to be a lot of them. And so far, I haven't come across another photograph that demonstrates both surface tension and refraction together in quite the same way as my image does. There could well be others that do.

Originally, I was going to submit this image to the usual microstock sites but if it's as rare as I think it is, it would be a shame to sell it for 25c or a $1. Just wondering what other options could there be for selling it? Not surprising, I think it would likely have some appeal within the field of science. I haven't really explored the macrostock / RM options in any detail. Would there be any other options out there?

734
General - Top Sites / Re: Thoughs On 4K Video For Stock
« on: April 05, 2017, 00:53 »
Usually after I render my videos, I drop them into MPEG Streamclip where I encode them as H264. I did have one video sale with a h264 clip or maybe I was just lucky. Out of curiosity, would there be any freeware available for Windows that could convert a clip to PRoRes?

735
Dreamstime.com / Re: Huge Spike of Sales
« on: April 04, 2017, 23:51 »
Same here, looks like a comeback of DT: during the last 3 months I made more than in the entire year 2016.

Good news for you. For me, it's the complete opposite. I do admit that I have a very small portfolio on Dreamstime but for me, the sales from 2016 were roughly 10x better than 2017. This year, it's pretty much dead over there for me.

736
Shutterstock.com / Re: First payment
« on: April 03, 2017, 09:13 »
Congratulations! I made my first payout recently too.

737
Dreamstime.com / Re: New Images not selling well on DT
« on: March 31, 2017, 08:11 »
DT dead here...a long time ago.
Yes, DeadTime

Lol. I always thought 'Dreamstime' was an unusual name for a stock photo agency. Perhaps they're in a deep slumber right now.

738
General - Top Sites / Re: Thoughs On 4K Video For Stock
« on: March 31, 2017, 07:59 »
This is going to show my lack of knowledge about codecs but even if you did upload or deliver your clips as h264, could the client convert that clip into an uncompressed format and then grade it? Sort of like the equivalent of still photo files where you have a lossy jpeg and convert it into a tiff to do your Photoshop work and make multiple saves with?

739
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime down?
« on: March 30, 2017, 18:59 »
At the moment, I'm browsing Dreamstime's forums without being logged on and I notice something odd. In posts that Ive made, my avatar is blank / not visible at all. Though other members' avatars are visible. The information about my number of uploads and sales is still visible when I move the cursor below my user name.

For a moment there, I thought I had been banned or kicked out. But I found out that I can sign in on a laptop but not on my usual pc.

740
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime down?
« on: March 30, 2017, 18:23 »
Something realy weird is going on with Dreamstime. The website is up and running but I cannot sign in. Each time I try and sign in with my e-mail address and password, it looks like the site is refreshing and then the logon fields become blank again. Ive tried signing in about five times with no success. This has never happened to me before.

741
General Stock Discussion / Re: Adobe stock
« on: March 29, 2017, 20:59 »
Ive had a few sales at Adobe Stock but I do have an extremely small portfolio there. If only they would fix their upload process. So many of my photos just don't go through when I submit them.

742
One of my plane shots sold within 24 hours of being uploaded. Thankyou buyer.

743
Dreamstime.com / Re: New Images not selling well on DT
« on: March 29, 2017, 19:04 »
When I read the forums over on Dreamstime, I cannot understand the mindset of some people there. There are some individuals who are exclusives on DT and they admit that their sales are poor and they're saying that they're hoping that there will come a time when good sales will return. Though if sales are poor, wouldn't it be better to dump exclusivity and upload to some other stock agencies? I just don't get this loyalty they have to Dreamstime.

And some individuals state that they became exclusive on DT because Dreamstime is the best stock agency and because they were treated poorly on other sites. It all sounds a bit vague to me with no real specifics. What makes Dreamstime the best stock agency (in their viewpoint)? And in what ways were they treated poorly on other stock agencies?

744
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime down?
« on: March 29, 2017, 00:29 »
Okay it's back up.

745
Dreamstime.com / Dreamstime down?
« on: March 28, 2017, 23:06 »
Just now I was browsing through the forums on Dreamstime and everything seemed fine. I was just about to upload a photo there when suddenly the website became unresponsive. I refreshed and reloaded etc but to no avail. At first, I thought it was my internet connection but all other websites are running normally. Anyone else having trouble with Dreamstime?

746
Off Topic / To sell DVDs at wholesale price or not?
« on: March 22, 2017, 23:27 »
Last year, a short film of mine was selected for screening at the Melbourne Documentary Film Festival. More recently, I had the idea of selling copies of the film on DVD. So far, I have sold a few copies at a local market which I'm happy about. The film features Australian wildlife and landscapes so I figured it might be of interest to international tourists. It was mainly foreign tourists who bought the DVD at my market stall so perhaps no surprise there.

Anyhow, recently I contacted a store via e-mail that sells mainly tourism related merchandise and asked if they would be interested in selling copies of my DVD. I forwarded a private online link to my film to the manager and she seemed to like what she saw.

Now usually, when local artists supply their craft products (cards etc) to stores and outlets, I notice that generally they hand them over for free and if some copies are sold, the store takes a commission and the artist receives the rest of the amount. And that's what I assumed would happen in my case too with the DVDs.

To my surprise, the manager of the tourism store got back to me recently and asked how much I was planning to sell the DVDs to her at wholesale price. This is certainly not what I expected. Normally, I would jump at the chance of selling them outright like this but I'm a little hesitant in this situation. Let's remember that it is a short film that I'm selling here running at 8 minutes. Although there is also over half an hour's bonus content contained on the disc, it is essentially an 8 minute film that is the main feature (and it's not even 'feature' length.)

In order for me to make a decent profit from the production of the DVDs, I price them at $12 each and that's what Ive been selling them at the markets for. If I was to sell them to this store at $12 for wholesale price, I assume that the retail price would be at least double that so at least $24. Now I could be wrong but I can't visualise many people spending $24 or more on an 8 minute film. Also consider that these days, you can buy a blockbuster movie on DVD for considerably less than that. Although selling the DVD at wholesale price would be better for me from a short term perspective, Ive got a feeling that handing them over to the store for free and accepting commissions on a lower retail price would lead to greater sales potential over the long term and may even result in the manager asking for more copies of the DVD in the future if sales are exceptionally good.

The other thing is she seemed a little hesitant about buying the DVDs because it's not the type of product she normally sells there. She said she was going to check her stats on similar products she has stocked before.

So what's everyone's opinion hand them over for free and accept a commission on sales or sell them outright as wholesale? I admit I'm totally new to this as Ive never been asked to provide a wholesale price for a product before. Obviously, companies who do sell at wholesale prices have their products mass produced in the thousands or millions so they would get a much greater profit margin than me when selling wholesale. Whereas my packaged DVDs are not mass produced there's only a very small number of them.

747
General Stock Discussion / Re: Have you ever been sued?
« on: March 22, 2017, 18:08 »
Quite a few years ago, I was at a live animal exhibition within a shopping center in Australia. There were various native animals roaming around in these enclosures. A security guard comes up and really gets stuck into me. He seems convinced that I was there to steal animals! All I was doing was walking around taking photographs. I even had my camera out when he approached me. He lectured me and gave me warnings etc and all of it was nonsense. He told me really sternly that: "If you try and get an animal out of here, I promise you - you won't make it." And telling me that I was being watched. He was talking to me non-stop in quite a fast-paced and serious manner - uttering all sorts of garbage. I had enough of that and walked out when he was in mid-sentence.

748
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock February 2017 statement
« on: March 21, 2017, 18:16 »
Just trying to recall....minimum payout at iStockphoto is $100 or thereabouts? Wonder whether I should dessert them once I reach payout.

749
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock February 2017 statement
« on: March 21, 2017, 10:32 »
Just read my Feb statement. Gosh, that 15% really stings - getting 72c out of $4.82 and $1.50 out of $10. I got a few of those plus the dreaded 9c and 7c sales. I do admit that I have a very small portfolio on all the stock sites that I submit to but my combined total for January and February on Getty / iStockphoto is slightly higher than my entire earnings at Dreamstime. Previously, before reading the royalties statement, I was considering stopping all uploads to iStockphoto. Now I'm not so sure.

750

Your right its up to you what you want to do and one of the things I like Mstock is no one can tell me what to do!

Amen to that! Completely agree.

Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors