MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Andrej.S.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
76
I've generated some AI podcast via google in german (sorry guys!) from the reuters and bloomberg news:
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/f38ddd09-762d-4a21-9543-6f68f9f98bbe/audio

Thank's god we have gemini.

77
General Stock Discussion / Re: New Year's Resolutions
« on: January 02, 2025, 14:08 »
Happy new year!

Some motivation for you:


The stone is not the destination or the goal, but the path itself is the stone. Every step, every effort, every challenge we take every day is the stone that drives us forward. It is the opportunity that we have every day to grow, to learn and to improve ourselves. Keep going and know that you are not alone.
one of my favorite essays,'the myth of Sisyphus'  --

"This universe henceforth without a master seems to him neither  sterile nor futile. Each atom of that stone, each mineral flake of that night-filled mountain, in itself, forms a world. The struggle itself toward the heights is enough to fill a man's heart. One must imagine Sisyphus happy.

Camus

Absolutely! Albert Camus is a great philosopher of the positive in the face of existential darkness. His works are like philosophical psalms of the Bible. I loved the interpretation of Sisyphus. Unfortunately, I haven't had the chance to read his other works, such as 'The Philosophy of the Absurd' or 'The Rebel', although the books are sitting on my shelf.

78
General Stock Discussion / Re: New Year's Resolutions
« on: January 01, 2025, 14:58 »
Happy new year!

Some motivation for you:


The stone is not the destination or the goal, but the path itself is the stone. Every step, every effort, every challenge we take every day is the stone that drives us forward. It is the opportunity that we have every day to grow, to learn and to improve ourselves. Keep going and know that you are not alone.

79
General Stock Discussion / Re: New Year's Resolutions
« on: December 31, 2024, 17:16 »
2025 Goals

1. Staying POSITIVE
2. Find a Niche
3. Concentrate on images that have a high commercial value
4. Be nice to others

Nice goals.

My goals are similar:
1. Maintain a positive attitude, even if it's difficult nowdays
2. Stay focused and motivated
3. Find my area of expertise and improve further my skills
4. Make more

80
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: December 26, 2024, 10:50 »
Unfortunately, sales have now dropped even further. Only a little more than half of the downloads from last week.

70 downloads / rank 2,410. The start of the year is going to be a brutal crash landing. The new images have an extremely slow start.

I need to look for new niches and hope for Easter.

But next year I will create more niche content for X-Mas and will be even better prepared since it's really the cash $$$ time.

81
General Stock Discussion / Re: What's the Future of Microstock
« on: December 23, 2024, 07:00 »
Yes, it's brutal how AI is eroding the market for classical photographers.
When I think about it, Yuri Arcurs was earning between 25k and 50k USD with a single photo shoot 15 years ago.

Nowadays, the earnings after costs such as photo equipment, insurance, models, props, etc. are brutally low. If you don't have top 1% skills, it's not worth it anymore.

The same applies to Illustrators, who earned really well back then. There was a time when shutterstock had no subscriptions for vector graphics. The buyers had to pay the full price (20 - 30 USD / download).

So all those who take or create generic motifs will slowly switch to AI.

But this trend won't be limited to the creative industry. With intense competition across other industries, businesses will need to automate processes and leverage AI to boost productivity in order to survive. This shift is inevitable and we can expect to see the outcome in various sectors in the following years.

But let's end on a positive note!
I'd like to wish you and everyone else here a merry christmas and a wonderful start to the new year!

82
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: December 22, 2024, 14:11 »
Slow week is ending.


Hope next week will catch up some sales.

Preparing already for eastern and genereting some new content.
Currently approx. 4.300 images + approx. 850 in review.

83
Ok, great, thank you!

So here are the results from pixify.io

Title:
Two Hands Forming a Heart Shape Symbolizing Love and Unity

Description:
Two hands of different skin tones creating a heart shape against a pink background, symbolizing love, unity, and diversity. Perfect for concepts of inclusivity, compassion, and mutual respect.

Keywords:
hands, heart, heart shape, unity, love, diversity, pink background, friends, friendship, solidarity, connection, equality, together, relationship, inclusion, support, compassion, multicultural, interracial, gesture, acceptance, affection, symbolism, care, collaboration, empathy, kindness, inspiration, two hands, partnership, respect, tolerance, teamwork, bonding, alliance, positivity, affirmation, shared moments, commitment, peace

84
Ok, let's switch to realtalk.

Let's test your skills vs. AI.

Write a title / description with 40 keywords of the following image and compare the results with AI (I will add these after user comment).




85
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: December 21, 2024, 06:45 »
Slow week.
129 Downloads / 3.580 position. Dropped from 2.820 position.

I hope the new reviewed content will bring some new sales.

86
I wouldn't use AI to index content,use your head instead!

Indexing content is very important,it is not a process to be skipped as quickly as possible,indexing is what ensures that your content is found,I prefer to do research on the topic I am dealing with instead.

I use AI to improve my work,but I prefer not to allow AI to control my work,I mostly create hybrids,not content completely generated by AI but only partially,then clearly I can also create completely AI content,why not,but even in this case,I will certainly have used generative fills or expansions.

To be honest, I don't agree not using AI for indexing and keyword generation.
If you use a good LLM with visual interpretation capabilities, you'll get extremely accurate results in approximately 99% of cases.
Even abstract concepts are often interpreted correctly.

It's not about AI dictating your work, but rather about leveraging AI as a tool to accelerate your workflow, guided by your expertise.

87
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobestock Review Time
« on: December 19, 2024, 11:19 »
Can't complain here. I have an acceptance ratio of 100% and get approx. 20 - 50 images / day approved.

Just focus on quality and don't spam too much with too similar content.

88
Actually the number of content doesn't mean anything because 99% of the stuff is mediocre and will be lost in the oblivion.
There are still very few contributors who has the eye and patience for quality.
And even less can imagine what the buyers are looking for.

89
Adobe Stock / Re: Multiple Accounts
« on: December 16, 2024, 19:42 »
but is there really this limit of 50 for beginners even for owners who have experience and therefore are not beginners?

and also the tax form?does it follow all the owner's accounts?I think it's possible.

There are many questions on this topic still unanswered,I've been thinking about it for a few months,maybe I should decide and start opening another account just for AI to get started and see how it works.

Yes, there is a limit. I've tried to create a new account some months ago.
You'll get no benefits. If you think that you can push more sales by various accounts than it's not worth the time.
Just focus on keywords + image quality.

90
Adobe Stock / Re: Multiple Accounts
« on: December 16, 2024, 17:28 »
If you've already created multiple accounts in the past and you want to differentiate your content into videos, images, vectors, etc. for clarity, than go for it.

However, if you need to create new accounts for this, it's not worth it due to the upload and review limit of 50 for beginners. Also new portfolios don't have a good portfolio ranking, making it extremely difficult to achieve sales at all.

From my perspective, it's not worth it. I would use just a single account.

91
Adobe Stock / Re: 2025 Creative Trends Forecast
« on: December 16, 2024, 12:08 »
Thanks for promoting and pushing AI-generated images.
Although many surreal and creative images are visually stunning (eyecandy), I'm not convinced there's a high demand for this type of content.

From my perspective, it seems that the most in-demand contents are either photorealistic images with creative compositions and everyday moments, or professional industry-specific content.

92
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: December 16, 2024, 11:51 »
But there might be a lot of people making more money inspite of a lower weekly rank. Especially video producers will have lower  ranks, but can have much higher sales.

As predicted, moving up a bit inspite of sales slowing down

pos 628, 7250 files

Yep, I can confirm the slowing down. 17 Downloads today with position 2.870 and 3.800 files.. I will also crash very hard in the january since I'm currently selling 90% only christmas content. I have 1.000 pending images, of which are about 200 further christmas stuff, that is still in review since almost 6 weeks ...

93
General Stock Discussion / Re: What's the Future of Microstock
« on: December 16, 2024, 05:52 »
Yes, definitely. The days of mass uploads, like back in Fotolia's time, are over. The competition is just too high.

Mass uploading only works if you deliver phenomenal quality, which is only possible with a large team, like Gorodenkoff (https://stock.adobe.com/de/contributor/200571845/gorodenkoff).

Another example like Romolo is ipopba with around 5,000 images and over 250,000 downloads (https://stock.adobe.com/de/contributor/205024019/ipopba). However, he is currently being heavily copied by other Thai contributors.

I would recommend diversifying one's portfolio very broadly and keeping it very lean. Per topic max 3 - 5 images and no mass spamming.

It's better to have one super top image than 100 uploads otherwise your portfolio ranking will drop and your bestsellers will also lose sales.
Most AI contributors kill their rankings and portfolios in the long term because of mass uploading.

94
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: December 13, 2024, 10:21 »
People will always want capture real events and people with cameras.

I wouldn't sign this statement because it doesn't match my own empirical observations.

Currently, over 90% of my AI generated that sell are motifs that clearly don't show to a real setting, but are obviously fictional. However, they are creative and have a clear visual message.

I can imagine the context for which customers need these images. For these purposes, real photo shoots would be simply too expensive and therefore not profitable.

By the way, I'm experiencing the same problem today as middle of the week, when after reviewing 100 new images, my sales have dropped significantly. And it were different motifs, so It could not be seen as spamming.

I believe that the ranking of single images is also related to the size of the portfolio and its profitability.

I'll see if my sales increase again when I delete old, unsold images and reduce the size of my portfolio, so that the algos would see my portfolio more profitable again.

////////////////
Interesting, found this question Adobe's community:
https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/adobe-stock-algorithms/m-p/14485107

Seems that some have the same idea like about the ranking system.

Quote
This is how I would do it:

Everybody gets a rank. The rank is your multiplier. The rank is based on your recent number of sales and the recent number of accepted assets.

Every asset gets a rank based on your rank and the number of (recent) sales and the age of the asset, and perhaps the favourite saves.

Exactly how I would implement the algorithm. I would always want to show the most profitable contributors first because they are the making $$$ horses and want to be motivated.
But the profitability of a portfolio can only be calculated based on sales and number of current accepted images.
So if your portfolio increases in size but not in sales your rank will drop and aswell the sales.

That would explain why small contributors can be so successfull and why most of us see a drop in sales although our portfolio is increasing in size.
So you can only beat the system if your portfolio is extremly good diversified in sales across the content.

95
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe's quarterly results
« on: December 12, 2024, 17:58 »
That aligns quite well with what I said months earlier, that Firefly is quite underwhelming (sucks real alot) and it seems obvious that many customers share the same opinion.

Adobe has invested for sure dozens of millions in researching and developing AI tools, which are surprisingly very weak and which do not offer any significant advantages over those offered by competitors. It`s definetly not the same when Adobe once held a dominant monopoly position in the graphics market with Photoshop.

Adobe's problem is that their AI tools are not sufficiently integrated into professional software like Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, etc. Professionals expect productivity gains that they're not getting any. If I still have to click through 5 menu tabs in Photoshop to select a filter, that's no longer state-of-the-art. It was 10 years ago.

The entire software needs to be completely overhauled to focus on AI with professional results. What's state-of-the-art is when I make a selection in an image and then write a prompt for what can be retouched, removed, or edited with filters (yes there is already generative fill in and AI select subject to remove background but it's very weak).
That's a productivity gain. And there are already competitors on market, who can offer these things.

And Adobe should finally realize that their Firefly just sucks and will suck in the future. They should completely  replace it with open-source AI models like Stable Diffusion or Flux, and provide a cloud service where they can earn money based on generation time.

They should also clean up their stock photo offerings. Introduce guidelines for contributors that are more aligned with customer needs, and steer better the huge amounts of AI images.

It's also time to introduce for contributors the technical ability to create their own series within their portfolios and move away from traditional keyword-based image searches. Instead, they should allow text-based prompting.

I wonder where all the development money is going. If I were an investor, I would also be very pissed of.

96
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: December 12, 2024, 10:47 »
Romolo is a legend in the holiday images. He might have the most successful portfolio ever for this type of content.

Nothing is ai, everything real images and photoshop. (I think)

But I don't believe anyone can ever catch up to him, because his algo ranking is impossible to match these days.

However it is a great example of how only choosing the superbest content works.

eta

I would be very careful about deleting files. Agencies don't like that and customers who have lightboxed these files for a future project like it it even less.

It takes time for files to sell, I have many files that only started selling a few years after uploading.

Better to just improve your uploads.

Jeah, he is really a beast. He literally sold every image at least once in his portfolio.

Also very broad diversified. The algo ranking must be crazy.

With AI choosing the superbest one is quite difficult because you can generate an infinite amount and you will always get a slighty better one.
And then the difference is so small that you can't choose and start spamming.

I bet that Adobe punishes the rankings of spammers.

So the interesting part is how Adobe decides which one is better, because when the images are reviewed you see them on various ranking positions in the search results even they have the same upload date and keywords.

97
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: December 12, 2024, 05:36 »
Algos shift all the time. The only way to deal with that is to diversify.

And you always have other people uploading similar files. Now with ai they might be near identical.

Files uploaded or being approved at the same time as yours are your main competition. That includes your own files.

You want the customers to ideally pick and push their favorite file up in the algos by buying it or at least viewing and lightboxing.

But if you upload 30 similar files from a series, this becomes very difficult.

So one easy thing you can do is to spread the uploads a lot more. Weekly batches of that theme or maybe even monthly.

The other thing I personally do is I do test searches every day on my favorite genres. Not just to see what is coming in but also when do people upload this type of content? And can I avoid clashing with them by uploading at a different time??

It all takes a lot of practise and is hard work, just like general research.

But it is the only way to rise up in the algos with a small portfolio.

Most important: don't just do ai. And don't just upload to Adobe.


Yes, that makes absolute sense.
The algorithm probably also considers the date and favors current images when quality and theme are equal. Timing is everything. If you miss the window of buyer interest, your images risk getting lost in infinity.


I'll do a test later to see what happens when I delete some of my images that are ranked lower in the search results, whether my better-positioned images will get a boost.

One should take a portfolio like this as an example:
https://stock.adobe.com/de/contributor/202483008/Romolo%20Tavani

Only 3,000 images and over 1 million downloads within 10 years (?).
However, copying his images wouldn't work, as he's built his rankings over a decade. If he would expand his portfolio now, it might probably harm his rankings in the algorithms.
This would also explain how some small contributors can get better results than big huge teams with many hundred thousands of images.

98
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: December 12, 2024, 04:56 »
last year i was on the bestseller list end of november, that gave me a strong push and increased sales, at least 30% more.

and this year i had 60% spring summer going live instead of winter because of the long queue.

I think if I am more careful next year, I will be fine.

This year I also have less individual bestsellers, insted a much wider variety of sales. Mostly just 1-5 times, but this gives me better copycat protection.

So, yes I am disappointed, but I think it is mostly my own fault.

My bestsellers from last year are still selling, but now more like several times a week instead of several times a day.

But they still sell, which is good. Often bestsellers die after one season.

The question I'm asking myself now is:
How exactly do new images affect the portfolio ranking and image ranking in the search algorithm?

Specifically, I want to know if it's possible that my own new images on the same topic are competing with my own bestsellers, and if I'm harming myself.

It's probably better to only upload 1 or 2 variants of an image, rather than 4 or 5.

I have the impression that my 500 newly reviewed images are suddenly slowing down sales. Previously, I had bestsellers that sold 10 times a day, but now they're not selling at all. Instead, the new images are selling less often 1-2 times.

It seems that there's an algorithm shift in the search results. And I'm wondering if I'm to blame for it myself.

99
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: December 11, 2024, 16:44 »
I think the prices for ai production will go down a lot in the next few years. There will be more and more people signing up, so the companies will literally make it up in volume.

I also think cloud upsizing will come at an affordable rate, especially for ai video.

Had a little surprise, moved up a little bit :)

But  December 24 will probably be 25-30% less than December 23 :(

Unless I get lucky and my spring files start to sell end of the month to balance it.

Brutal, if you consider that you probably added some thousands new images.
So, you have to very wisely look up for into niches and fill them quickly so that you diversify your portfolio. Otherwise, it doesn't make any sense.

Today was a weak day with 27 downloads. This week, I have sofar a total of 114 downloads. I will for sure drop down  tomorrow from position 2,820 to 3xxx or even 4xxx.

100
General Stock Discussion / Re: What's the Future of Microstock
« on: December 11, 2024, 08:13 »
I think with AI, the market will continue to grow for another 3 to 5 years, as more niches are covered for the buyers. However, I expect a sudden crash at some point within the next 10 years as soon as AI agents automate the entire process from image creation to image use.

When a blogger or journalist then instructs the agent to create an article and a matching image at the same time, it's game over.

So, one should take as much cash as possible over the next few years and then move on.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors