7526
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 7527
General Stock Discussion / Re: Need advice on client request« on: August 29, 2008, 06:46 »
He can do whatever he wants to do in Photoshop. Why would he think he couldn't?
7528
General Stock Discussion / Re: What's your best and worst experience with models?« on: August 28, 2008, 16:02 »
My second model showed up smelling of smoke, with awful teeth and stringy hair. I only uploaded one of that series.
I still shoot with my first model, who is awesome. If they were reversed, I might not be here today ![]() 7529
SnapVillage.com / Re: NEWS - Top 5 Cameras You Wish You Could Afford« on: August 28, 2008, 15:39 »
I see plenty of follicles with the Mk3.
7530
General - Top Sites / Re: Should I go exclusive with IS?« on: August 27, 2008, 08:59 »For example ... money...? Among a lot others. Are you sure? Sales, maybe. Net, maybe not. What others? Downloads? Pretty easy to get a lot when you're spread across subscription sites where the cost per image is almost nothing. I'm just saying, don't judge your situation by comparing yourself to anyone else. 7531
General - Top Sites / Re: Should I go exclusive with IS?« on: August 27, 2008, 06:28 »its worth bearing in mind that the worlds most successful micro stock photographer is non exclusive. Why? Most successful in what sense? 7532
General Stock Discussion / Re: focus my work on isolations« on: August 26, 2008, 11:21 »
While some isolations sell well, overall, they are very simple to do, which is why everyone does them. People, objects, animals, they've all been done already. You're just cutting into the pie.
7533
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock pays out 100% Royalty Yesterday« on: August 26, 2008, 08:50 »
Ah, sorry. Forgot to mention that.
7534
iStockPhoto.com / iStock pays out 100% Royalty Yesterday« on: August 26, 2008, 07:35 »
8/25/2008 was the 100% day:
http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=75471&page=1 7535
General Stock Discussion / Re: How far is too far - copyrights, logos, etc.« on: August 25, 2008, 19:04 »
Lego bricks have always been protected. This is no surprise.
7536
General Stock Discussion / Re: Give up my day job and live from stock« on: August 25, 2008, 16:20 »
Don't forget taxes, health insurance, retirement, disability, life insurance, overhead, equipment costs, etc... etc... It can all add up if you don't have a "real" paycheck and benefits.
7537
General Midstock / Re: Why does midstock not work?« on: August 25, 2008, 10:16 »In terms of technical qualiity, I agree. In terms of location, models, styling and props, I think there are still some things you just aren't likely to find on the micros. Yuri's casino shoot was a first (I think - certainly according to him) for a micro given the expenses. I tried to get into a Casino a few years ago, but here in Missouri, they won't let you in with a camera (unless it's their marketing) for any cost. 7538
General Midstock / Re: Why does midstock not work?« on: August 25, 2008, 09:23 »
Because there is no real difference between the images uploaded at any level, anymore.
There is a perceived gain ( and some habitual ) buying, when you buy at a high price from the macros. You may gain some exclusivity due to price. Also, some clients like to see purchases from the big houses. There is no buyer gain at this point from spending $50 on something you could either buy for a higher price for the above reasons, or at a micro due to price. The micro floor may eventually move upwards a bit more (although not if subs stay strongly in the game). 7539
Photoshop Tutorials / Re: Photoshop Tutorial: The Dodge Tool for Isolations Over White« on: August 25, 2008, 07:41 »Dodging is destruction. Layers can be tweaked later on if there is an issue. True, but then you increase your file size... 7540
Photoshop Tutorials / Re: Photoshop Tutorial: The Dodge Tool for Isolations Over White« on: August 25, 2008, 06:56 »
Dodging is destruction. Layers can be tweaked later on if there is an issue.
7541
General Stock Discussion / Re: Chumley's Contact Info« on: August 24, 2008, 00:34 »
Well, if anyone cares to read any of Chumley's advice, it's still cached at google, and you can partake of it before google refreshes.
You don't have to play the martyr. However, I already explained how some things came across. If that wasn't clear enough, then I don't know what else to tell ya. Stick around if you want to. 7542
General Stock Discussion / Re: Chumley's Contact Info« on: August 24, 2008, 00:08 »
I'm trying to explain to chumley why he got the response he did.
Of course, now that he has edited and cleared out almost every one of his posts: http://www.microstockgroup.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1492;sa=showPosts we can't really go back and see what happened, can we? Now we all look like idiots, talking to ourselves. I thought this was all about sharing your experience for our benefit. Why did you clear out your history? 7543
General Stock Discussion / Re: Chumley's Contact Info« on: August 23, 2008, 22:42 »
If you're going to step in here and make grandiose claims without identifying yourself, you're going to get questioned. You seem to be taking this personally that people were questioning your anonymous motives. Now that we know who you are, offer unsolicited advice all you want but don't be crushed when not everyone responds in kind.
This has been blown way out of proportion. 7544
General Stock Discussion / Re: Chumley's Contact Info« on: August 23, 2008, 17:03 »
IMO, while you do seem to have a lot of experience and some beautiful work, two of the firsts posts you started were about "sharing your RPI" and "sharing your shot lists". Now, as part of a group that makes 6 million a year, you may not have much to lose by giving away bits of information to smaller players, but for these smaller guys struggling to keep up their income, they have more to lose by offering up their insight on various things. Like whose portfolio pays best ( copy their work ) or how they brainstorm and come up with ideas ( copy their workflow ). You kept pushing "Share your RPI, share your RPI". This may not have been your intent, but that is how it came across. A newbie here trying to pump people for information. Not giving out any information about your identity. You've stated you're at the end of your career, which is fine, so you may not mind giving out all your "secrets", but don't get your feelings hurt if everyone doesn't feel like returning the favor on every subject. Here's a subject I'd like to know about. How do you go about finding middle aged to senior models? Do you find them all at agencies at high prices, or are there some secrets involved? 7545
Illustration - General / Re: 3d images« on: August 22, 2008, 18:28 »
It doesn't look like displacement though. Those threads have roundness to them.
7546
Illustration - General / Re: 3d images« on: August 22, 2008, 17:32 »
No way that is cg. Really? Did you do it? The texture on the cloth doesn't look like it could be.
7547
Illustration - General / Re: another vector thief« on: August 22, 2008, 11:29 »
How can those still be up on SS from zmajdoo ? Amazing!
7548
Illustration - General / Re: 3d images« on: August 21, 2008, 22:05 »
There is plenty of 3d on iStock. If you want to back up your argument, you need to post some examples.
7549
General Stock Discussion / Re: Chumley's Contact Info« on: August 21, 2008, 18:09 »
Freaking *insult removed*!
I like your crossing guard image. That one really jumped out at me. You should link your Getty link to your user name so people can see your portfolio. 7550
Illustration - General / Re: 3d images« on: August 21, 2008, 18:06 »
I use Maya.
The big money is in laptops, with little lines between them, with globes in the middle and RSS symbols above. |
|