MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Anyka
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38
826
« on: December 21, 2009, 10:55 »
I understand noise. But when Istock refuses images for "artifacts", it's nearly always for images without large spaces like skies, but with animals in it, furry animals. They often reject for artifacts and give me "the problem" piece enlarged, so I can see which part of the photo is the problem. And it's always a part of the animal's fur.
827
« on: December 02, 2009, 01:08 »
Dreamstime Sales 25 / 398 Uploads 28 / 398 iStockPhoto Sales 53 / 456 Uploads 38 / 456
Suprised sales is better than uploads at DS - I'm not doing so well there lately compared to other sites.
828
« on: December 01, 2009, 11:41 »
BME on all sites (some only by 1%) except on BigStock. Bigstock is going down every month. Shutterstock only had a BME because of the OD's - so let's hope they keep the OD's on that site. Fotolia beat Istock again this month, but narrowly. My order : SH - FT - ISP - DT - StXP - BIGS - 123rf.
829
« on: November 30, 2009, 14:52 »
+ 1015 = 40748
830
« on: November 14, 2009, 15:51 »
They may be more European, but they're certainly not greater than most posters on this forum. My approval percentage may be great, but unfortunately approval % and RPI are different things
831
« on: November 14, 2009, 02:27 »
I'm always amazed when reading these fotolia-rejection posts, since my acceptance ratio there is (and has always been) 90%. Do I have a secret? May-be, but I don't know which one it would be. So here's my uploading "technique" : my uploads are 20 to 25 images per week, uploaded during the weekend, and ALWAYS in a complete variety of subjects. NEVER more than 2 images of the same shoot. About 15% has people in it, not because FT doesn't like people, but because I don't have that many people shots. I don't read my rejection reasons, but after a look at my collection of FT rejects, I can say that they're mainly : backgrounds, graphics, infrared images, landscapes and flowers, and darker images. In all other cases, the images were also rejected by other sites, so they must've been really bad. Oh, and one other thing : Fotolia does not like sad or distressing images (about war, death, suicide ... unless it's a halloween picture). Also : all images are keyworded the Fotolia-way, so with the 7 main keywords at front. Last remark : my absolute rank = 138, my relative rank = 99. Now you tell me : where's the secret? Certainly NOT the image quality, which is definitely not superior to the forum members with lots of rejects. Subject matter? I live in Europe, which influences subject matter of course and Fotolia's origin is European. Also : Fotolia is my second best seller. I have sent requests to FT about changing the EL value of ALL my images (I did that twice in a year), and they reacted positively whithin 4 days. So Fotolia likes me, and I like Fotolia. Do I have a secret? Tell me which one!
832
« on: November 05, 2009, 09:47 »
Thanks for telling us about the re-keywording. My CTR was (has always been) 10 to 20% below average CTR. A few months ago I re-keyworded all photos (I had about 400 then), with no CTR improvement. Reading your post I now realize my re-keywording was not drastic enough to have any result. On the other hand, Alamy keeps saying that CTR and "Alamy Rank" is not the same thing. CTR is only PART of Alamy rank. No idea what the other parts are though.
833
« on: November 05, 2009, 09:17 »
Hi there - with very tight editing of my portfolio, my CTR averages over 2.5. This helped lead to $600+ sales last month - best for a while. Without the editing, I'd have been sunk.
Alamy results do seem similar to the rest of the maco world - my own agency included.
Rgds
Oldhand
2,5 CTR .... WOW !!!! Congratulations!! What do you mean with "editing" : cleaning up keywords?
834
« on: November 05, 2009, 02:13 »
I am not surprised : not just my own CTR, but also average (general) CTR has been down these last two months. It used to be above 1,10 and it has been below 1 for more than two months now. (right now it's 0,80). Low CTR means (amongst others) less views by customers ...
835
« on: November 01, 2009, 07:43 »
Great month. Fotolia broke all records and pushed IS off its 2nd place. Now it's Shutterstock, Fotolia, Istock, and Dreamstime slowing down more and more.
No idea what's wrong with Dreamstime. I started with Fotolia and Dreamstime on the same day, and after 2,5 years I have the same number of images with both sites. Fotolia however beats Dreamstime's sales with more than 50% every month.
Shutterstock wasn't bad, but it stopped growing. If the On Demands really stop in November, Fotolia can try and grab first place! Bigstock did so bad, it's not even worth talking about.
836
« on: October 10, 2009, 00:41 »
DT takes an average of 1 week with my images. FT however managed to review the first images of a 20-image-batch BEFORE I finished submitting the last one. And 10 minutes later all 20 were reviewed and approved. This was the third week they managed to do this, so it wasn't a coincidence.
837
« on: October 07, 2009, 23:53 »
I never had a problem with the low earnings at SS, simply because I always believed that their buyers buy more images than they really need. Suppose you are an image buyer, and you can download 25 images per day, but you only need 15 per day. What do you do? You download more than you need, so you can choose afterwards which image looks better on your magazine/site. Or you download the 15 you need, and you download 10 other ones for personal use at home ... What I'm trying to say is that every 25ct at SS gets more money because of extra images that would not have been downloaded at agencies without subscriptions.
What I DO have a problem with at SS is the long period between approval and "publication on the site". Last week, I uploaded and submitted 20 images on Thursday morning. They were approved on Saturday morning. Sunday, Monday and Tuesday there did not appear at searches ("newest first" order). On Wednesday, all images from the last 4 or 5 days were put on the site in ONE BIG BATCH, and mine were buried on page 8. Result : no sales of newest images.
838
« on: October 01, 2009, 12:42 »
September was 16% better than August, but that was EASY, considering August was my worst month of the year. Fotolia did great and got very close to Istock's second place. Shutterstock - still number one - had a low number of downloads, but the On-Demands and enhanced licenses saved the month. Dreamstime - what's wrong with Dreamstime??? Same number of images as Fotolia, and doing only half the sales for two months now ...
839
« on: September 27, 2009, 01:02 »
I use CS4 until Lightroom makes a new version that does NOT put my keywords in alfabetical order. Lightroom is perfect for caption and description, but Fotolia (and Alamy in a certain way too) wants the first 7 keywords to be the most significant ones.
840
« on: September 25, 2009, 14:35 »
May be not only the career of the one who faked the MR. If just a few cases are found out ... how will buyers react?
841
« on: September 25, 2009, 14:17 »
I think stolen images is not the only situation where one would use fake MR's.
Suppose you are shooting nature shots and there's this guy walking his dog and you take a shot that turns out great. The guy is hardly (or not) recognizable, but afterwards, the photo turns out to be really good stock material.
I have such a picture. It was refused by half of the sites because I don't have a signed release. Blur the face? That would ruin de shot. Fake an MR ?
Before you start thinking I did that : no, my man-with-dog shot was not good enough to do all the trouble of faking an MR (and beside that, I'm too chicken to do it). But isn't this a situation where one could be tempted ?
842
« on: September 20, 2009, 11:48 »
Keywords are not translated in your portfolio, only in search results. Try this : put the site on the chosen language and do a search with translated keywords. Be sure to use words that cannot be translated otherwise, because the automatic translations REALLY make a mess of it. It's easiest if you put the search on "newest first" and then type keywords for one of your newest images. If you find your image, you'll see the keywords are translated. Be sure to sit down when you do this, cause the translated results are truly hilarious! (at least they are in Dutch, may-be not in other languages).
843
« on: September 16, 2009, 11:20 »
One more "Other" I wish every member was required to have at least one link to a site they have a port on, so we could tell who is full of crap and just ruining their mouth off and which ones know what they are talking about. -Larry
Absolutely! That would be great (why didn't I think of that?). I often wonder about people's portfolios. Or I ask myself "is he a vector or a photo guy?" or : "a landscape type or succesful stock-on-white-background type?"
844
« on: September 01, 2009, 14:22 »
August was really bad. July was much, MUCH better.
845
« on: August 21, 2009, 07:30 »
so how many sales per how many images are people getting here?
For the months of March-April-May-June I had an average of 140 euros with 1900 photos, which is about 1,2 dollars per image/year, and almost the figure that Juha predicted. However, I don't know how many of these 1900 were accepted and added to the collection, so it might be more than 1,2 per image/year.
846
« on: August 20, 2009, 23:52 »
4 to 5 weeks holiday for adults?  I think I will be moving to Finland !!!
847
« on: August 20, 2009, 14:31 »
Same here!
848
« on: August 18, 2009, 13:46 »
That's weird, Fotolia was my fastest payer this month ... I submitted my payment requests for 6 sites on the same day (even same hour), and this was the result :
- Fotolia 3 days - Dreamstime 4 days - Shutterstock 8 days - Istockphoto 9 days - 123rf 13 days - StockXpert : still waiting (it's 17 days now)
849
« on: August 18, 2009, 13:36 »
I finally sent e-mails to the 3 people I know at Rodeo, and this was Juha's reply today : (I did check my spam folder daily though). Hi Anyka, Have you checked you spam folder? Reports should be sent thru June. July reports isnt sent yet. Some photographers have been found the reports in Spam folder since it is html mail with a lots of small thumbnail photos which might be caught by even easier set filter. You should add my email ([email protected]) to safe senders list.
As summer is very challenging time for us as we're shooting a lot of new photos ourselves too are reports delayed a great time. Also summer months commissions are paid later September/October as July/August is national holiday season here in Finland and sales are very slow.
All emails what I receive will certainly get answer usually in 1-2 weeks. Summer season is exception as I might be out of office several days at time. Daily requests and questions I get thru out the year is like I earlier mentioned very challenging as I write around 300-400 emails every month plus all other work. As I always tell to everyone we only have two full time employees (me and Tero Sivula) and Ossi is doing reviewing as part time. Til we get more employees there is usually holiday seasons a great delays in replies since we have to keep up all the customer inquiries the minimum delay.
Hopefully this cleared up things how things work here and everything is going great here! Best regards, Juha Tuomi
850
« on: August 16, 2009, 14:06 »
If this goes on much longer, one of us should learn Finnish ... shall we draw straws ?
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|