|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Microstockphoto
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 ... 49
826
« on: February 22, 2016, 16:59 »
rinderart, i really dont get it, you write an email to adobe to give you 50% but you keep bragging about the BIGGEST crook agency in stock world giving you a 3% royalty. cant make this stuff up
827
« on: February 22, 2016, 15:41 »
so you started 11 months ago, you have about 100 images online,still on 25 ct and you doubled your earnings from 2 dollar 50 to 5 dollar per month. now consider people who do this for a living who see their earnings decline each month up to point they need to find a second job.
828
« on: February 22, 2016, 15:25 »
isnt 50odd thousand enough to file a class action lawsuit?
829
« on: February 22, 2016, 14:49 »
i always go on a shoot in my M1 Abrams
830
« on: February 22, 2016, 14:48 »
i see the OP is lost in off topic comments, oh well
831
« on: February 22, 2016, 14:47 »
'Thank you for being part of the community' - great, now pay up
832
« on: February 22, 2016, 13:04 »
personally i won't have a problem with adobe crushing shutter but monopolies are never good. just like to know if people see there total income improving with adobe or if the increase offsets shutter decline?
833
« on: February 22, 2016, 02:10 »
834
« on: February 21, 2016, 18:50 »
haha cool
835
« on: February 21, 2016, 18:01 »
are people better off below the line or is the money just shifting from ss to adobe? nice to have adobe doing well, but my overall earnings are not improving, its like communicating vessels.
836
« on: February 20, 2016, 15:25 »
someone comes here offering a job, at reasonable pay, nothing shady, take it or leave it, but for the love of god, people need to stop moaning, *
837
« on: February 17, 2016, 18:38 »
agree but agencies protect themselves from buyers not sticking to the rules. simple as
838
« on: February 17, 2016, 18:21 »
didnt i just say that
839
« on: February 17, 2016, 18:10 »
owned by tyler olsen, not affiliated with any agency, you can say what you want here but agencies have representatives here and some agencies have punished people for stuff written here
840
« on: February 17, 2016, 18:05 »
sean is right but again, send it to shutter, they might listen
841
« on: February 17, 2016, 18:03 »
thing is agencies can do and reject what they want. but you should forward that email to shutter and let them know
842
« on: February 17, 2016, 04:40 »
dumc, very easy, metadata comparison. ss cs dt do it, its not rocket science just a very simple automated process
843
« on: February 17, 2016, 04:38 »
was the buyer side down as well? 11 subs on monday, with thousands of files, my my
844
« on: February 15, 2016, 16:01 »
same old story here, someone comes here for help and ends up being vilified. 5 similar images out of 27k. smh
845
« on: February 15, 2016, 12:27 »
symzio is hardly worth millons. ill put money on it that it doesnt have more than 100k images,
846
« on: February 15, 2016, 03:31 »
you do sound a lot like yuri thumping your own chest, the difference is, he did take action and left. you just complain and then brag how the biggest crook agency has an upswing in sales
847
« on: February 14, 2016, 18:06 »
somebody came up with opting out of Els, did you opt out?
848
« on: February 13, 2016, 20:44 »
people need to understand that cost of revenue is different from cost of sales.
849
« on: February 13, 2016, 15:54 »
apparently only native english speakers live in the US. have stock photographers become pathologically negative and paranoid?
850
« on: February 13, 2016, 11:12 »
are you really suggesting not to trust them over spelling mistakes? now ive heard it all.
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 ... 49
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
