|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Peter
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 ... 52
826
« on: April 29, 2008, 13:35 »
I dont know about you, I upload via FTP and can submit 50 per day (at this time).
yesterday I submited 42 files.
827
« on: April 29, 2008, 13:09 »
upload limit is based on aproval rate. for me: Your approval ratio is 78.3%. This means that you can upload 50 images per day. Use the following form to upload your image. you can have up to 200 per day limit if you have 95% aproval rate.
828
« on: April 29, 2008, 09:23 »
type "fruit" in search (without quotes of course) - 0 results. lol.
829
« on: April 29, 2008, 08:36 »
Did anybody else contact support? What they asnwered?
830
« on: April 29, 2008, 00:59 »
Lol, their suport is very funny I guess, I wrote a message: Something happend today - when enter my (or anybody elses) portfolio, by relevance, images are sorted badly, no more best images at front, what happend? and I knew they reply somrthing like this: We are not sure we understand your request. Please describe in more detail how can we assist you. LOL! It is like they even do not know anything about this. Thats why I told you to write them a mesage, not only me.
831
« on: April 28, 2008, 15:09 »
This happend before. this is a bug. you should all report it to support, sooner they will react.
832
« on: April 28, 2008, 12:02 »
yep, me 2. again. not happy.  btw, thre is no "sort by views" any more. for now.
833
« on: April 28, 2008, 09:23 »
30-45% drop in sales for me. uploading as before. 
834
« on: April 27, 2008, 04:57 »
that "artist" should be tied to a rope to see for himself how it is like. moron.
835
« on: April 23, 2008, 10:15 »
hi. I am waiting for wayout at DT 7 days now, is it unusual? How long do you wait these days?
836
« on: April 20, 2008, 13:52 »
why dont you try with Neat Image: 
837
« on: April 20, 2008, 12:37 »
perhaps. in that case, agency should still pay the "damage fee" to original author.
838
« on: April 20, 2008, 12:16 »
Credits from thief should be credited to original author, and not kept by agency.
839
« on: April 20, 2008, 11:58 »
you tried to make minimum 7 words and you made 19 words. hhh. I think there is unnecessary information issue here.
yes, you can resubmit, with corected title, and make a note to editor that you fixed the problem.
840
« on: April 19, 2008, 07:42 »
What is there to laugh about?
human stupidity for thinking they can sell someone elses work.
841
« on: April 19, 2008, 07:40 »
I presume you've informed FT about this.
of course.
842
« on: April 19, 2008, 05:54 »
 some russian guy has entire portfolio of stolen images... lol.
843
« on: April 19, 2008, 05:37 »
You want to bribe them? 
844
« on: April 18, 2008, 14:18 »
why dont you report it to support?
845
« on: April 17, 2008, 15:53 »
can you post link to fotolia? I want to see the kws.
846
« on: April 17, 2008, 15:08 »
no, no, you missunderstood me. Forget about quotes. I wrote them only to point out multi words. I didnt talk about quotes.
I say: If you have in your keyword list a multiword keyword, or word with symbols such as _- the rest of keywords wont work.
Prove me wrong. Post an image link to fotolia that search cant find? I think my theory is right. And has nothing to do with ranking.
ps.
post a link to FT image, not a thumbnail, so we can see the kws.
847
« on: April 17, 2008, 13:29 »
I think I know why some images cant be find by search engine.
Problem are multi word keywords. If you have at least one multi-word keyword in your image, almost all other keywords are scredwed up, and cant be found. Why? Because serach engine stuck on first eror in keyword list for that particualr image, and search no more.
for example if you have an image with those keywords:
"red apple" fruit, food, healty, vitamins....
the chance is that almost no keyword would be found. But if there are no multi word kws, they would be probably all found (and not only first 7, but all).
Correct me if I'm wrong with your example.
848
« on: April 17, 2008, 13:26 »
With portfolio size of 83, you can hardly have sales even ig search engine was perfect! That is small number of files, and stock photography is a numbers game. The more you have, the more you sell. Quality is important, but quanity is too.
I know what is the problem, you put multiword keywords, and that screws every keyword in your image. Instead of "arctic lupine" you should put "arctic, lupine".
Every image that has multi-word keywords, has screwed all keywords in it.
849
« on: April 17, 2008, 13:23 »
lol, if you think that stock agencies are scam, or conspiracy, just dont submit photos and go making candles or something else....
850
« on: April 17, 2008, 07:20 »
this is not site X, but top 4 sites: shutterstock, dreamstime, stockXpert, fotolia. but hey, I have 2500+ aproved images, those 50 are drop in the sea for me, I dont mind at all....
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 ... 52
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
