MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Anyka
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38
851
« on: August 15, 2009, 16:10 »
OK, the site is on-line again, so that was a server problem. It's even up-to-date because I am seeing a series of Autumn and back-to-school images. But the silence towards submitters is still going on ... so has any one heard of them since June ?
852
« on: August 15, 2009, 15:58 »
Has any one heard from Rodeo or Juha Tuomi these last two months? The first 4 months gave good sales, then suddently it went dead : no sales, no reports, no answer to e-mail, just silence. Until a week ago, the site ( www.rodeo.fi) was still working, there was just no contact between submitters/site. Right now (could be just a temporary server problem) the site is down. Via Google I found www.rodeostudio.fi which seems to be made to attract photographers, though lots of it is in Finnish. What worries me most, is the fact that Juha Tuomi is not reacting to the microstockgroup posts anymore (he used to be very quick in response a few months ago).
853
« on: July 31, 2009, 14:17 »
After three months without sales at Alamy, I was very surprised to see 4 images sold in one day ... until I saw at what price they were sold : 17 dollars for the 4 images together. They were sold under the new "novel use" license, with means I get 50% of it = 8,5 dollars for 4 photos. I almost forgot what "novel use" meant, so I checked my Alamy e-mail announcements and this is a quote : The scheme is optional and shouldnt be confused with Micropayment.OK, I'll do my best and NOT confuse this with Microstock ...
854
« on: July 28, 2009, 06:54 »
I am sure you're right about July being a "dead" month, but Rodeo sends sales reports in the beginning of the month, and I did not receive one either. This means that we had no sales in June. As for July, we'll have to wait until the first week of August.
855
« on: July 24, 2009, 10:03 »
In Belgium "Legal Entity" means (correct me if I'm wrong) that you act as a company, and not as a private person. You are employed by your own company, even if there's only 1 person (yourself). Therefore self-employed people are companies too. If you live in a VAT-country, you will have a VAT-number. This would mean you (and I) belong to group B2. However, Shutterstock then said we have to decide (with our accountant) which type of Form W-8 is correct for us ... and there's my problem! Last time I asked a similar question to my accountant he let me wait for 6 months before I got an answer, and I'm sure the Shutterstock grace period will not last that long!
856
« on: June 21, 2009, 00:46 »
Mine are 71% - 12% - 17% (over the last 5 months)
857
« on: June 02, 2009, 13:48 »
I wish I COULD get it insured ... I can easily have all my stuff insured as long as I do NOT use it professionally. But I do use it professionally, and then there doesn't seem to be any company around that has a policy that fits my case. I checked with several other professional photographers, and none of them had insurance. There are plenty of foreign companies of course, but I prefer a local one, especially in case of dispute/legal issues.
As for hotel rooms, I do not need extra insurance, since the small print in the fire/theft policy for my house states that "my house" is everywhere I live, hotels included. So when my hotel room is robbed, I can claim the theft from my fire/theft policy at home. May-be you could all have a look in your fire/theft policy to check if hotel rooms are included ?
So what's left is : getting robbed in the streets, theft out of the car (I NEVER leave anything in my car) and my own clumsiness (dropping stuff or tripping over my own tripod).
858
« on: May 31, 2009, 01:27 »
In theory - and I really mean IN THEORY, cause I have not tested this of course, and I am talking about the Belgian tax situation, which happens to be one of the countries where one pays A LOT of taxes :
1. Most contributors still have another income, and this income (let's call it JOB INCOME) is probably higher than Microstock income. 2. That means Microstock income and Job income are added together to be taxed in your own country (let's assume at an average percent of 25%). 3. You send in your tax return to your country's government, and deduct your expenses. 4. Now this gets tricky : indeed, many of us have more photography expenses than photography income, yet we do not deduct every expense, for the simple reason that if you would do that, you would have a negative microstock income, and the Tax Inspectors would accept that for your first start-up year, but not every year. So let's assume your job gives you a net income of 20.000 (dollars, pounds, euros, not important), and your photography an income of 10.000 minus 7.000 expenses = net income of 3.000. 3000 extra income x 25% local taxes = 750 to be paid extra to your government. 5. Shutterstock pays you 10.000, of which 50% is of US buyers, so 5.000 x 30% = minus 1500, so you are paid 8500 instead of 10.000. 6. On your tax return, you put the 7000 expenses, but also the 1500 prepaid taxes. 7. 750 national taxes minus 1500 prepaid taxes = less than 0, so you don't have to pay anything to your local government anymore (at least for your photography income). 8. As I understand the treaty system, every country on the treaty list agreed to avoid double taxing of their citizens, but I don't think that all these countries pay eachother what they collected. So the USA will not pay the 1500 to Belgium, and Belgium will not pay to the USA what they collected from US people living in Belgium. 9. That means that in the end, you will have paid 1500 + 0 local taxes, which is more than 25% on my net photography income. 10. Conclusion : if your country has a treaty, you MUST do the paperwork, so that Shutterstock will not deduct anything. If not (like Serbia?), you should absolutely find out how to report the pre-paid US taxes on your national tax return, and which documents are needed to prove it.
I repeat, this is purely theoretical. Any one here who can back up the theory ?
859
« on: May 29, 2009, 09:01 »
Thank you thank you thank you Leaf for the tip about calling the IRS on the phone!!I just made that call and it took me exactly 12 minutes to get my EIN number (5 minutes waiting for my turn, rest of the time answering questions). All they needed was : my name and address, NOTHING ELSE, not even the VAT number of my company. I got the number at the end of the call, and I can use it immediately, though it will also be sent to me by mail. The reason it took 7 minutes just to give my name and address was : I had to spell every letter twice, and then the nice IRS lady spelled it letter by letter again for checking. I am afraid the next step won't be so easy though, because the W8-BEN form uses language that is completely over my head. Is there any one on-line who could tell me which box/boxes I should tick on this form? I am a Belgian one-man-business submitting to Shutterstock ... (a) The beneficial owner is a resident of ...... (Belgium) within the meaning of the income tax treaty between the United States and that country. (b) If required, the U.S. taxpayer identification number is stated on line 6 (see instructions). (c) The beneficial owner is not an individual, derives the item (or items) of income for which the treaty benefits are claimed, and, if applicable, meets the requirements of the treaty provision dealing with limitation on benefits. (d) The beneficial owner is not an individual, is claiming treaty benefits for dividends received from a foreign corporation or interest from a U.S. trade or business of a foreign corporation, and meets qualified resident status. (e) The beneficial owner is related to the person obligated to pay the income within the meaning of section 267(b) or 707(b), and will file Form 8833 if the amount subject to withholding received during a calendar year exceeds, in the aggregate, $500,000. I am quite sure (a) and (b) should be ticked, but what about (c) and (d)  ?? Clause 10 is also a mystery to me :(10) Special rates and conditions (if applicablesee instructions): The beneficial owner is claiming the provisions of Article ........ of the treaty identified on line 9a above to claim a ....... % rate of withholding on (specify type of income): ........................... Explain the reasons the beneficial owner meets the terms of the treaty article: ... I wish Shutterstock would just publish a few fake examples ...
860
« on: May 23, 2009, 00:16 »
OK, for the OUTSIDE workers I think I am the winner for the shortest distance : 2,5 minutes by car, or 1100 meters (yes meters!). Yes I know I could walk that distance easily, but (1) this is Belgium and that means LOTS OF RAIN, and (2) I do my shopping right after work and for that I need the car (good excuse?).
862
« on: May 20, 2009, 23:37 »
Some one at the forums at fotofanatic.com (contest site) "confessed" he was selling at Shutterstock. He was jeered at by the other members for selling his art at such ridiculous prices. Not by me, cause I got curious (and I never regretted it).
863
« on: May 13, 2009, 13:37 »
I think the the biggest photographers watch closely this thread, just they don't wanna be exposed because they don't want to ruin relations with agencies.
I am sure that will be one of the reasons why the Big Ones do not react. Another reason (especially for smaller contributors) might be the possibility of retaliation by the agencies. If an agency notices that contributor X gives his/her images exclusively to the new collective "premiere" site for the first six months, the Big Agencies will not like this. I don't expect they will ban Yuri for it, but what about the smaller contributors? By the way, I really liked the term "Premiere" - don't remember who launched it in the other thread, but I think it would stand out as part of the site name (photopremiere.com, premierestock.com?)
864
« on: May 08, 2009, 10:42 »
That is great news, congratulations! It's a very useful tool.
865
« on: April 28, 2009, 23:55 »
1. Quit day job FINALLY!!! 2. Do full time shooting 3. More travelling 4. Pay a student to take over the boring stuff like uploading, maybe keywording too
Life would definitely be more fun!
866
« on: April 25, 2009, 10:12 »
"Gelukkige Verjaardag" (congrats!) from Belgium!
867
« on: April 24, 2009, 10:26 »
I started in Feb.'06 with Shutterstock and Istock on the same day. Made a good start, but I said to myself : 2 is enough. Now I'm with 8 agencies. Now I say to myself : 8 is enough.
868
« on: April 23, 2009, 14:01 »
A little update : according to Istock the keywords will be kept for 24 hours? Well, it's less than that : not even 12 hours! I deleted my uploads, uploaded them all a second time this morning, and now, 11 hours later, they've disappeared again! But it works fine if you keyword/categorize immediately after the uploading.
869
« on: April 22, 2009, 14:05 »
oh nooooo!!! Now I have to re-upload 20 photos  Thanks for the link! I'll re-upload tomorrow morning at work - they've got a leased line there, that's 10 minutes uploading instead of 1 hour at home ...
870
« on: April 22, 2009, 13:54 »
For months I used the forum-detour trick to make my keywords re-appear after uploading to Istock. I found that trick here on MSG and it worked great! As soon as you notice that all keywords, title and description have disappeared, you just visit the forums for a minute and voil the keywords are there again... Only, today the trick did not work. Tried again and again. I even logged out, deleted all istock cookies, logged back in, jumped in/out of the forums ... NO keywords ... What's up? The bug has a bug?
Does anyone have another trick to solve the new bug?
871
« on: April 11, 2009, 09:09 »
Fotolia switches between 2nd and 3rd place for me (changing places with Istockphoto all the time). My top 10 photos cover all subjects (food, nature, objects, 1 isolation, people, animals). I also notice that 70% of my sales is downloaded during European working hours.
872
« on: April 08, 2009, 23:42 »
I had my sales report from Marsh on 1st April (and was very pleased with the results).
873
« on: April 04, 2009, 13:44 »
I'm Belgian, so I don't know anything about US tax forms, but were I live the difference between artist work and royalties comes from wether there is an assignment or not. If you make images without any assignment, and you place them in an image-bank, the income is royalties. If some-one, like an editor, or a company that needs specific photos, asks you to create images of a particular subject (and you are self-employed) then the money paid should be put on your tax form as non-employee compensation. For me in Belgium that means all stockphoto income is royalties, and that makes a HUGE difference in Belgium (15% tax instead of 50%).
874
« on: March 29, 2009, 14:40 »
 Shot in my home in Belgium, with my brother-in-law and my niece. Not a best-seller, but really FUN to do!
What a coincidence. I downloaded a comp of this shot a while ago for a customer that wants to revamp a pundit blog about immigration/economic issues in Flanders. We're meeting next Friday about the design. I always thought this is one of the most amazing shots I've seen on Dreamstime.
Thanks! If you decide to use it, I'd love to see the final result!
875
« on: March 28, 2009, 11:12 »
 Shot in my home in Belgium, with my brother-in-law and my niece. Not a best-seller, but really FUN to do!
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|