MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Microstockphoto
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 ... 49
851
« on: February 13, 2016, 02:46 »
wow i am not getting this mockery. seems like a fair offer to me. people are ok to shoot in their own time and then sell an image for 25 cent but then complain 350 dollar day rate is not good enough. if i had the time id definitely be applying.
852
« on: February 12, 2016, 02:23 »
that is not an EL that is a SOD
853
« on: February 11, 2016, 19:00 »
$30, i am at 30%
854
« on: February 11, 2016, 18:57 »
working for me
855
« on: February 10, 2016, 14:11 »
new images need time to get traction and establish themselves. i still notice images emerge after a period of time. its also still possible to get bestsellers. and although some images have dropped off as most popular they still sell daily. some are still going after 3 years
856
« on: February 10, 2016, 14:05 »
excluding the 6d? better cam than 5d3
857
« on: February 10, 2016, 12:39 »
the whole empire is built on assets they dont own. just a shame we dont use that power
858
« on: February 08, 2016, 15:46 »
i would like to know too. Please
859
« on: February 07, 2016, 04:18 »
no issues with bigstock, fair reviews
860
« on: February 06, 2016, 17:33 »
banks charge fees too. i dont have a problem with paypal making money. they have costs too. try and find a free of charge payment processor.
861
« on: February 06, 2016, 16:53 »
stockmaan, no they don't
862
« on: February 06, 2016, 16:52 »
R2d2, all depends on the country you are in
863
« on: February 06, 2016, 16:19 »
using a payment processor cost money, period. ss sends dollars, youre angry at the wrong company
864
« on: February 05, 2016, 13:43 »
9000 downloads 45 dollar
nuff said
865
« on: February 05, 2016, 13:36 »
i experience no issues, sorry
866
« on: February 05, 2016, 13:34 »
a lot of money? 0.005c per download. are you sick in the head?
867
« on: February 05, 2016, 04:27 »
review time is 24 hours or less and also considering they reject 40% or so, reviewing about 1.5 - 2 million images each week, it has to be technology. employees cost money, they are reducing cost, cutting royalties, maximising profit, so they will not hire people to review. welcome to the machine
868
« on: February 04, 2016, 13:07 »
a lot of sense Duncan. thanks
869
« on: February 04, 2016, 03:21 »
anathaya, correct, the two comments have a a difference context copidosoma, agree, dont see any name calling in my comment though
870
« on: February 03, 2016, 17:34 »
i am getting a bit tired of the finger-pointing. why is anyone not wanting to cut their income further a naysayer, naive, negative? get off your high horse. everyone has a right to do whats best for them.
871
« on: February 03, 2016, 17:30 »
who writes these stupid announcements? 10 percent the crooks.
872
« on: February 03, 2016, 04:15 »
unless you get 30% of the contributors on board including some top contributors, we will not make a difference. thats not being negative, thats being realistic. the factories wont join in, they have a responsibility to pay people on their payroll. we have also seen when yuri left, taking 110k images and millions in dollars, ss just let him go without blinking. why do you think ss limited the amount of images you can delete at 1 time? because theyve learned from istock dday and the dpc revolt. they knew al along they were going to cut royalties, and more will come. we will see a drop in royalties until this business becomes unsustainable for the amateurs. and only then, when the microstock business defaults, we will see a change. but that will be a long way from now, look at getty, they keep dragging themselves along when they have been broke for years now. the bubble will burst, but dont hold your breath
873
« on: February 03, 2016, 04:04 »
tried/suggested a million times, will never happen
874
« on: February 03, 2016, 03:35 »
rinderart, gbalex, did you opt out?
875
« on: February 02, 2016, 14:48 »
rinderart, no need for history lessons i was there, i don't recall you being the front runner though. but you opted out for ELs then?
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 ... 49
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|