MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Phadrea

Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41
876
iStockPhoto.com / Re: End of Year IS review Statistics
« on: December 31, 2011, 06:30 »
This terrible, slow month (which should be a good one) is set to be the worst in over 2 years. So glad I am dropping my crown in a few days. I am down over $2238 this year compared to last.

877
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 30, 2011, 08:04 »
Can you imagine John Deere suing because one of their tractors is in a shot ? It's free advertising for a start.

878
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 29, 2011, 02:00 »
So far I am finding my experience uploading to SS very positive. Ok, I had a few initial rejections but on the whole I am experiencing good results getting images into the collection, especially ones IS rejected over and over. I can't wait until I can flick the switch and get them all live to start earning. Only 15 days to go !

879
I have emailed them to request they disable my images so I can upload but I never heard back.

880
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 22, 2011, 10:28 »
It's getting ridiculous and is killing the enjoyment of taking photographs.

881
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 22, 2011, 06:40 »
What I find strange with SS is the fact they turn down a distant tractor crop spraying in a field,  plastic toy robot, a distant herd of cows, a traction steam engine , for copyright or trademark reasons, and thats just a few. There are no logos or names on any of these shots. And yet things like statues get through no problem. One building was turned down on the basis of a logo but it's got no logo. It's a different ball game I suppose I must get used to. IS accepted all these and they are very picky about logos. I think we are a bit more relaxed in England.

Anyway, I am still glad to be and and getting images accepted because I want a reason to get out there and shoot editorial images which is more my thing. IS has earned me $1100 less than last year. That's a huge loss and I can't afford it.

882
No.  They told me I have to disable the files myself. :-\

883
Thanks. I could only disable one image, the other it wouldn't let me. It states that only one can be disabled.

As for joining, I am not sure of how well it will go reading all the negative posts here regarding Dreamstime.

884
Ok,thanks :-)

885
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 21, 2011, 05:34 »
SS, dont make ridicuolous rejections,  they simply dont need the stuff or classify it as generic rubbish, keeping their files clean from irrelevant material and thats it. Anybody that has a problem with that?  join IS. :)

If you are trying to provoke with sardonic remarks (something in abundance here) forget it. Anyway, I am in now  ;D

886
I am waiting for my release from exclusivity on another site and have just been accepted at Dreamstime. However, I need to disable my images NOT delete so I can turn them back on when independent.

How do I do this please ?

887
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 20, 2011, 06:33 »
Sigh....a load more rejections and sadly the files sell well on IS. One was turned away for not being in focus when it is pin sharp. I don't get it but at this rate there won't be much in my folio.

888
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 19, 2011, 09:32 »
Yep but at this rate I won't have nearly as many files up on SS as I do on IS because of the high number of rejections. The reviewer yesterday passed a lot. TOday's reviewer was the opposite. Will it be worth being on SS with much less files ? I don't know but it won't hurt to try.

889
Thanks, I will try that.

890
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 18, 2011, 12:06 »
My ideal car would be something like a new Golf that is well built, safe and economical. Even so, the cost of petrol dictates how often we have days out now. At the moment I have a 1.2 2002 petrol Polo which is good though not as good on fuel as I thought. I upgraded from a 19991.6 Focus which was costly on fuel.

891
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 18, 2011, 07:14 »
Its costly enough running a car. It gets you from a to b. That's it.

892
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 18, 2011, 05:25 »
Like I said, cars are not my thing. I like simpler things in life like growing veg, nature, music, walking i the countryside etc etc. Most that are free :-)

893
Shutterstock.com / Why so many files failing through Filezilla ?
« on: December 18, 2011, 04:19 »
I am frustrated with uploading to SS because nearly half the files I send over via Filezilla are failing to go through for no reason. They are all JPEGS but not all go through. It's a real pain.

894
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 17, 2011, 08:19 »
A Ferrari is the last thing I would buy, even if I could afford one. cars are not my thing, even overpriced ugly ones like a Ferrari.

895
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 16, 2011, 15:45 »
Do you think even though I will have less files at SS they will still earn me better money than IS ? I did notice when my initial 9 were accepted, before I had chance to disable them (still exclusive at IS) I had already made a sale of 25c. If that is the case with only 9 files in such a short space of time the future looks very good :-)

Rejections were vague (focus/composition/lighting/WB/not needed) At least I have some of my best sellers at IS in there but sadly a few that didn't make it which is a shame because there is proof they do sell, even at IS :-(

896
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS down!!! I'm panicking!
« on: December 16, 2011, 15:41 »
It's down for me too and I still get loads and loads of files not going through to them from Filezilla even though Filezilla says they all went through ok.

897
Shutterstock.com / Re: Ridiculous rejections
« on: December 16, 2011, 14:17 »
Well, after a couple of days uploading and keywording I thought I would update on my progress. I have had 76 images rejected and 39 accepted. To me that's pretty bad going and at this rate I will be finding it hard to match the numbers I have in IS. Or, is this pretty normal, are they very picky once you are in ?

898
Dreamstime.com / Re: Can't upload to Dreamstime
« on: December 16, 2011, 11:56 »
It's ok, I have managed to sort it. It has it's own username.

899
Dreamstime.com / Can't upload to Dreamstime
« on: December 16, 2011, 11:50 »
I am finding it impossible to upload any images via their site. I am asked for my username and password when I have my files in the box ready to go and I get an error message "invalid login" It's the same as my username and password I am already logged in with so what's going on (or not as the case may be) ???

900
Pond5 / Re: Photos at Pond5
« on: December 16, 2011, 08:23 »
I might give them a go then :-)

Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors