|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Microstockphoto
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 ... 49
876
« on: February 01, 2016, 16:12 »
the royalty cut is quite severe when they also cut the selling price, even without the price cut, it would already have a big impact. i would not be surprised to see a 50-75% CUT on our ROYALTY
877
« on: January 31, 2016, 13:03 »
canva could be good for backgrounds
878
« on: January 31, 2016, 13:00 »
my images get lost mostly after they accepted them
879
« on: January 30, 2016, 04:29 »
green machine, exactly
880
« on: January 29, 2016, 12:49 »
they all have different terms, so no one can answer that question for you without knowing your needs, why dont you go and check the agencies yourself?
881
« on: January 29, 2016, 12:36 »
jonbul, i never signed up for 25 cent downloads, i signed up for 20 cent downloads and 20 dollar els, but that is not the point either, we just got a price cut from an agency that hadnt cut royalties before (except referrals), and you are defending it because we accept 25 cent downloads in the first place. noticing you are talking about 33 cent makes me believe you havent been in the game longer than a year.
882
« on: January 29, 2016, 10:20 »
jonbull you are talking nonsense, but following your logic, why do we have to accept a paycut of 26 subs per EL? i cant even phantom why you would defend the agency over this. your in the wrong playground for that.
883
« on: January 29, 2016, 10:17 »
why do all these threads need to be derailed? you start to wonder if they are on a payroll. Tyler could you remove off topic comments please.
884
« on: January 29, 2016, 04:51 »
you are missing the point, you would have gotten 112 dollar
885
« on: January 29, 2016, 04:33 »
spamowanka, how can you be content with missing out on 20 dollar?
886
« on: January 29, 2016, 04:32 »
if they were getting scarse then surely raising the usage limit to 500k for standard licences didnt help
887
« on: January 29, 2016, 02:33 »
Good Luck.
your a front runner when it comes to complaining about ss and taking action, here is action, and you wish them good luck instead of joining? my my
888
« on: January 27, 2016, 17:30 »
the app is fine, its just the website, not to worry
889
« on: January 27, 2016, 10:34 »
so you actually agree with me then great
890
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:07 »
zero talent, it has been proven over and over that the most sold photo is not the most popular photo ss is showing in the results. my most sold photos are not even near the position they should be at. but that was not the point, the point was, how do you know if you got the best image? answer, you dont, unless you wade through 38,000 photos.
891
« on: January 27, 2016, 08:06 »
zero talent, tell me, how do you determine if you have the best image without checking all, lets say, 38,000 results for diversity in the office? are you going to check all 38,000 results? i actually like this image on page 200 better than the image on page 1, both submitted roughly in the same period page 200  page 1  were going off topic, apologies
892
« on: January 27, 2016, 06:22 »
out of 70 million images they will never know if they got the best image or not. if they search and get 200 pages of images and they wont know if the first 10 pages are newbiew photos or not. they will pick the photo they like best on those 10 pages, i doubt they will look further than 2000 images.
893
« on: January 26, 2016, 06:32 »
ill say it again: GTFO
894
« on: January 26, 2016, 06:31 »
they have changed their policy for deleting images, when they announced a 100 image limit for 90 days I knew they were safeguarding themseleves for communicating bad news
895
« on: January 25, 2016, 16:15 »
no one said or insinuated that
Well Shutterstock and other sites seem to think so?
thats not what you said, you said vets think they should earn more, you did not say agencies
896
« on: January 25, 2016, 15:56 »
no one said or insinuated that
897
« on: January 25, 2016, 14:35 »
its a disgrace
898
« on: January 25, 2016, 12:52 »
theres been more cuts, they also cut the sods pricing and they increased sub pricing without sharing the profits and they increased standard licence print run
899
« on: January 25, 2016, 12:13 »
from pixart:
2 = $199 U.S. 30% x 100 = $30
5 = $$449 U.S. 30% x 89.8 = $26.94
25 = $1699 U.S. 30% x 67.96 = $20.39
if we knew what packages were bought we could calculate the impact for us and SS
considering the above:
2 ELs pay increase of 7%
5 ELs pay decrease of 3.8%
25 ELs pay decrease of 27.2%
sigh, lets hope they sold 2 EL pacakges the most, but considering they want to increase their profit, i am afraid we will see a lot of 20 dollar ELs now...
900
« on: January 24, 2016, 04:50 »
have to vent, i was happy enough to have scraped through christmas and new year without zero sale days but this weekend it happened. shocking. thousands of images in my port and cant even sell one image. ss in decline. but at least theyre not cutting royalties, oh wait
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 ... 49
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
