pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - gnirtS

Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38]
926
Shutterstock.com / Re: "focus" craziness
« on: December 20, 2012, 11:10 »
Something odd happened there - review times have dropped from 7 days exactly to me to 4 days (last week) and latest batch 3 days. 
Acceptance rate has gone down by over 25% as well for those 2 batches.  No "focus" at all this time, every single one is composition instead.

Im also wondering if they could say EXACTLY how many reviewers they have and what the criteria is for hardware.  Im getting more and more convinced by the white balance/lighting rejections that some of them don't have properly calibrated and brightness profiles screens.

The sudden drop in review time is surprising, either less people uploading this time of year or they're just trying to catch up on a backlog of photos by giving a cursory glance/rejected a lot to clear the queue before the new year.

927
I had 4 isolation images (of 4 different animals) all rejected for composition last week.  I think its just a reviewers "i dont like that" personal preference and a random reason from there.

Now why do they not just put a %&^%$#@#$ review note on their list which states "Rejected: Personally I just think your picture sucks. If you want, submit again, but if you get the same response again, your picture sucks."  :P

That would be a lot easier to work out what they do and don't want at times rather than misleading focus etc (which stand a much higher chance of being re-uploaded once "fixed"!)

Ive not seen them use the LCV reason for ages now.

928
I had 4 isolation images (of 4 different animals) all rejected for composition last week.  I think its just a reviewers "i dont like that" personal preference and a random reason from there.


929
Shutterstock.com / Re: "focus" craziness
« on: December 13, 2012, 22:31 »
Interesting thread.

I keep a list of all the rejections and reasons (yes im that sad) and something changed a few months ago.  Previously rejections were  a fairly even spread of lighting/composition, noise and so on, no real one reason standing out.  Suddenly a few months ago "focus" started happening and looking at the stats since October onwards for me 75% of all rejections have been for focus.
Nothing has changed with my setup since then and a lot of the images were taken as part of large shoots a while ago and others from that shoot were accepted.
If it ISNT automated screening then something somewhere has changed.
Some do seem to be maddeningly inconsistent though for example 1 accepted another taken some 3 seconds later (tripod, locked exposure, locked focus, bright sunlight, fast shutter, infinity distance non moving subject) rejected.  A blue background image accepted whilst a white background made from the same photo rejected for focus and so on.
It's almost like a reviewer gets bored and rejects photos they dont like by just clicking "focus" as he goes through without really looking sometimes.
That said they really do seem to dislike blurred background shots even if the main subject is razor sharp- more often than not those get rejected for me.

The vast majority of the time i'll resubmit the rejected focus ones (no note left, done as a new submission) and they'll be accepted.

930
Shutterstock.com / "Popular" search order broken ?
« on: December 05, 2012, 15:29 »
Has anyone else noticed (or not) that the "Popular" search order appears broken on Shutterstock?

On my image gallery the page hasn't changed since roughly the 2nd week of November.  On the main site as a browser/buying the keywords i've tried search on all also appear to be stuck since that time and unchanging.

Is this an issue affecting everyone or just some of us with some terms?

If it IS stuck, is it actually worth uploading new content now?  If "Popular" isn't working which would appear to be the most popular buyer search method then any new content after 2-3 days in the "New" will vanish off the face of the earth and not be seen to sell again.

I did try to email contributor support but have received no response at all (not even a confirmation of the mail being received).

Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors