|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Sean Locke Photography
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 ... 314
926
« on: August 12, 2017, 09:59 »
Hi, I recommend this new stock site;it is swiss based and it has a good start. I withdraw already $138 in 2-3 months..i think. Good luck!
www.lifeographies.com
Look, we don't mind hearing about new sites. But if you're just going to spam your own thing like we're idiots, well...
927
« on: August 11, 2017, 22:00 »
First post?
928
« on: August 04, 2017, 05:59 »
Here's what I got:
We would like to thank you for the cooperation and want to make it more profitable for you.
Your portfolio was disconnected from affiliate sales at Depositphotos earlier. Over the past few years we have improved the policy of partnerships. As you may know, affiliate sales are one of the additional tools that help to increase the income of authors.
The platform graphicstock.com is interested in placing your work on partner terms.
Please let us know whether you are ready to include the possibility of reselling your work through our affiliate partners.
929
« on: August 04, 2017, 03:24 »
low ISO is best for bright sunlight
No need to bring up all these old threads.
930
« on: August 03, 2017, 11:00 »
My titles are like:
Hospital: Male Doctor Holds Digital Tablet And Discusses Treatment With Patient
My description would be:
Image from a series set in a hospital with doctors and patients
So, in the sites that correctly use the title data as the main descriptor of the image and the description as secondary, it's fine.
931
« on: August 03, 2017, 10:49 »
Yes, but my "title" data is more specific to the images I upload than the "description", so that's what I want on the page.
932
« on: August 03, 2017, 10:27 »
I noticed that many of my photos have the title and description field mixed up after the file is uploaded to SS. It's pretty crappy as it means even more work, especially in case of editorial content. Any tips regarding this?
On every image uploaded to SS, I have to clear out all the titles (with description data) and manually copy the title from windows explorer into the field. It's a pain. Same with 123RF.
933
« on: August 02, 2017, 11:40 »
They asked me as well, some months ago.
If I remember the discussion with them correctly, their standard license inlcudes "print merchandise", which requires an EL everywhere else...
Odd they limit prints to 100k, but allow merch.
934
« on: August 02, 2017, 11:11 »
You pay a yearly subscription then you can purchase images at a reduced cost
Their program is confusing. So, there are two "collections", and a yearly fee gets all-you-can-eat content from one collection, but it also allows you to buy from the second collection?
935
« on: July 28, 2017, 16:04 »
No idea why, but all I got was a video of black frames.
936
« on: July 27, 2017, 09:11 »
That's just some filters on and bad camera work of a modern parade. Look at the people on the side watching.
937
« on: July 24, 2017, 15:50 »
With a million files added each week (month?), bookmarking a page of a search would never work, just due to the addition of the new files.
938
« on: July 24, 2017, 11:58 »
I would never expect the search to be the same from one day to the next. That's what lightboxes are for.
939
« on: July 24, 2017, 11:26 »
Hello,
I have problem at my iStock portfolio.
I uplouded imager in ESP and this is marked as accepted/published and I resieve email too, but in my portfolio is NO Image result.
My portfolio is Nenad Vasic / 1Vasic.
Contact Getty. Don't bring up a 10 year old thread. Geez.
940
« on: July 24, 2017, 08:42 »
"Can we promote our work in this way"
Yes, you can.
941
« on: July 21, 2017, 16:37 »
I wouldn't brag about essentially breaking the exclusivity rules. The point of exclusivity was to raise the value of the collection by having unique imagery. In fact, this bit from Getty pretty clearly states what exclusivity means, and I think that applies to what IS had as well:.
"Can I submit Similars of Accepted Content elsewhere?
No, Similars of Accepted Content cannot be submitted to any other stock agency, and/or directly licensed by you because by signing our agreement you are granting us exclusive licensing rights which allow us to maintain ideal pricing. If Similars to Accepted Content on Getty Images are available elsewhere, customers will tend to shop for the lowest price, driving licensing fees for that image down over time. Please review our Similars Guide to learn more about what makes an image Similar."
Of course, the only person you really hurt would be yourself, since 'identical' content was available elsewhere cheaper. Sorry, I didn't like it then and I still don't like it. It's got nothing to do with 'your shoes'.
942
« on: July 21, 2017, 04:46 »
My caretaker and I stood side by side for 7 years and shot exactly the same thing. I was exclusive with istock. He was not. I made 5x more money than him a month and still do even though we don't shoot together anymore. Our content looked exactly alike because he had to stand by me so I didn't fall. Point being, you can shoot with someone that is non exclusive and their images will look the same. Just like at a Lypse.
Yes, we know. It was quite ridiculous. I wouldn't brag about it.
943
« on: July 20, 2017, 13:58 »
Ah, if only I had had the initiative to have my wife stand next to me shooting similars so I could upload to both IS exclusively and non-exclusive sites.
944
« on: July 20, 2017, 09:52 »
If you're out shooting nature, or someone hiking or something, I imagine the photographer has to hide behind a tree to not be in the shot. Really anywhere, you'd have to start it and hide, right?
There's usually somewhere to hide or I can cut myself out when editing. Just take two photos and move to a different place and it's easy.
For video, though, there's no editing, I imagine.
945
« on: July 20, 2017, 09:51 »
Absolutely not.
946
« on: July 20, 2017, 07:23 »
If you're out shooting nature, or someone hiking or something, I imagine the photographer has to hide behind a tree to not be in the shot. Really anywhere, you'd have to start it and hide, right?
947
« on: July 20, 2017, 06:50 »
Randy, stop pulling up random old posts.
948
« on: July 20, 2017, 06:47 »
If shooting regular stills/footage is hard due to logos/people/etc., I can't even imagine what a pain 360 might be.
949
« on: July 17, 2017, 11:26 »
I asked Fotolia regarding images and didn't even mention video.
Maybe they thought that because everyone knows to shoot/submit at your sensor ratio for stills.
950
« on: July 14, 2017, 08:10 »
22 custom exclusive use images for $300?
Sigh.
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 ... 314
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
