try to update weekly. if it is not critical then move to monthly. problem of rounding.

Quote from: luissantos84 on June 08, 2012, 19:34
I remember that istock charts had around 35k contributors, your stats show 78k ??

Yes, we have about 78k authors. have such a number has at least one photo or illustration.

When looking at the table displays the portfolio - this sort on the default. I think the line number in the search at all is not important.

Table Count SALES - it's a reference - can be sorted by sales.

In general, you can sorted of the portfolio, sales, customer rating.

On the right is the filters, they will see only the exclusive authors and writers over the levels of sales: base, bronze, etc...

Istockcharts was closed, we made our table with the statistics of the authors Istockphoto.

http://www.microstocktime.com/tool/stats/is/

Welcom!

Total Statictics:

• There are 78 453 authors in the base in all.
• The size of the base is: 10 899 022 works.
• Total sales: 123 553 923 +

Andresr, we now soiraem statistics for Istock and Dreamstime. I hope it will be interesting.

Andresr, can leave your contact, you want to interview. We have tried to do this when a colleague was in London. But you did not respond to e-mail and Facebook.

We have statistics Microstock Agency Depositphotos

You can see: list of authors, the number of their works in the portfolio, the number of sales, from the author, date of registration and level.

We hope to translate successful and you will not have problems with understanding.

http://www.microstocktime.com/tool/stats/dp/

Total statistics Depositphotos

• There are 13 490 authors in the base in all.
• The size of the base is: 7 488 497.
• Total sales: 2 711 941.
• Downloads per image: 0.36 (DPI).
• Data imprecision: 0.13%.
• The largest portfolio: 108 690 works.
• The author — Icetray.

Good afternoon, colleagues.

My English is very bad, I write with the help of Google)

From what I understand. The imprecision of 2.6% is considered to be so - the declared size of the base image on the site Shutterstock divided by the fact that we are summing the portfolio evaluators all authors in our database.

Precision: 2.6% - incorrect translation, data imprecision: 2.6%!!!

p.s.: If you have any questions for me, please write as simple words and short sentences. Thank you.