I am so shocked to hear this. Good Luck Sean, (not that you need it). I am speechless.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Ploink on February 01, 2013, 11:06Quote from: mbug on February 01, 2013, 10:18
...Bonobo posted a snarky comment...
While I appreciate the play on words, I think you are giving Bonobos a bad name. They are a gentle, peaceful genus, known forf$cking aroundsolving their problems via sexual activity. I'm not sure the same applies to our hairy friend, nor am I sure I want to know
Quote from: ShadySue on January 31, 2013, 00:01
So, was Lobo lying when he wrote:
Hold on a second. You called and talked to someone(I don't know how)
{@Lobo, it's called a phone}
(Lobo once said that contributors could not ever phone CR, no exceptions, and that was in response to a contributor/buyer apparently trying to ask a question in their buyer capacity. However a different admin [oldladybird?] said we had to phone as soon as we suspected fraudulent activity. But Lobo seems not to know about that.
"and railed on the Contributor Relations rep demanding an apology from someone higher up than her. I'm not sure what you think you will accomplish by not telling the entire story, but I will tell you this I'm not going to let you make a bunch of unfounded statements in here.
It's not going to happen. So please understand your not entirely being truthful in here."
http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=351067&messageid=6833227
If there is more to the story, can you share it?
If there isn't, make a screendump very quickly as that could be libel.
Quote from: VB inc on September 21, 2011, 19:44
I think the economy is pretty crappy and is seriously stalled with no growth and i think the US is definitely in a double dip recession.
There's more competition and buyers leaving istock due to many reasons. Another factor I believe is playing a part in vectors demise on istock is that the vectors keep losing valuable slots in the first couple of pages to new collections like agency, vetta, exclusive+, photo+, editorial... throw in audio and video... all these new collections are more money for GETTY and is surely best match for GETTY and not to the contributors. my top sellers were consistently on one of the first in 20 slots until the end of 2010. Now they can be found on page 2 or 3 of 200 images per page. My 30+ dls a month files now get me 10-20 dls.
istock clearly treats vector contributors as second class citizens. Take the slider that they introduced. Put that in the lowest/cheapest one dot setting and do a search for anything. no vector files above 8 credits show up in that search which pretty much eliminates 90% of my portfolio. Funny, i spent the last 3 years tailoring my portfolio to files priced at 15 credits and above because that was the only way to maximise earnings. My guess is anywhere from 10-25% of searches on istock are used in those settings now. Everything that has happened within the last 18 months was in no way positive for the vector contributor.