pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bluerabbit

Pages: [1]
1
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock has changed how have you?
« on: September 08, 2010, 21:44 »
Plan to refocus and create better, high-sales potential images for Veer, DT, SS, 123, and BigStock. Will also explore other agencies mentioned here. will stay away from IStock for the time being. (Made my lightboxes there private.) Will add blogs, lightboxes, and other valuable side content on other sites. Will also recommend other sites to photographers and designers I meet. Will also recommend that nobody choose an exclusive contract, and offer this situation as a good example of why such deals are not good for artists.

2
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock changing royalty structure
« on: September 08, 2010, 21:32 »
We should all discuss it here rather than in the forum over there, because hits on their site might add to the site's value. I don't feel like helping them at the moment.

3
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock changing royalty structure
« on: September 08, 2010, 14:14 »
Just shows that going exclusive anywhere sets you up to be used and abused. Sure, independents are going to get a pay cut, but we have multiple outlets. It will have an effect on my income, but not as bad as the great majority of exclusives on iS! I have actually recommended going exclusive on IS to some people just starting out because it offered a better return on a small portfolio. To anybody who followed my foolish advice, I apologize. Diversify.

4
General Stock Discussion / Re: No freebies!
« on: August 02, 2010, 12:12 »
Those of us who have been on the Internet long enough have seen that things start out free, and then, when customers are hooked, the bills arrive. Quality content does not want to be free. It wants to be paid for, and the Internet economy is moving in that direction. When I post pictures on Flicker, I post very small versions of "seconds" I couldn't sell and save them for the web at low quality. Now, granted, this would be fine for display on portable devices. The big watermark is a good idea. We do have a problem with low quality images. People are even reading magazines on low-res portable devices now. Will high res shots even be relevant in the future? Anyway, I'm with the majority. I won't give my quality pictures away.

5
General Stock Discussion / Re: No freebies!
« on: July 07, 2010, 10:12 »
Some sites will switch your old unsold photos over to their free section if you don't watch out. Change the default setting for auto-removal to "delete". I sell pictures on several sites. Why should I give away full-sized files that are still selling? Sure, some of my old ones have fewer mp and my older versions of PhotoShop weren't as good with WB, but I still don't want to give them away. Recently, a friend who is not a photographer told me she is having a harder time finding good free photos to use on her personal projects. I think that may be good news. In spite of all the talk about free content, I think we are seeing a shift to subscriptions or pay for use for writing and visuals online. The days of free samples are slowing drawing to a close. Creators have expenses just like everybody else.

6
Dear Mr. Hippy,
I have a solution for you: if you don't like microstock, don't submit to microstock. We like it, sorry.  :P

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors