perry, we've got plans for a multi-image upload, but don't count on it for a little while yet, we've got some other updates already in motion

ap, glad you're enjoying it too,

stockastic, yes, lots of people buy our photos every day; yes, we do have a sharing aspect; yes, it is valuable; no, I'm not trying to convince you to join either.

if any of you have anything you want to ask or suggest or or or or, you can PM me here at microstockgroup or at PC (http://www.photocase.com/en/user.asp?u=66906)  but no questions about photo selection please

Quote from: epantha on February 20, 2010, 20:07

My personal opinion is that these types of photos might do better and be more appreciated by a site like Photocase.
http://www.photocase.com

I hadn't heard of that site so hopped over there and did one of my usual searches.
First impression: over 50% of returns on the first keyword I tried don't match the keyword. At all. Not even at a stretch.
                         Around 70% of my second keyword didn't match, but several of these, generously, could be considered a 'stretch'.
Second impression: They don't half soup up their images!
Anyone using this site? Anyone getting decent sales?

Epantha is right, providing those are decent quality technically, I would certainly have accepted a few of your example images.

Hi Shady Sue,

We already know there is room for improvement in our search. In fact, we've been optimizing the catalogue for the past 6 months or so, but there are still some words that have yet to be checked. The optimization is prelude to a huge search update which will vastly improve the search results. This update is coming on Sunday night (Feb 28th, 2010).

 What search terms did you use, if you don't mind my asking? ( My go-to search words for trying out a new site are "glacier," (for depth) "dog" (for stock photo clich�s) and "sexy" (to gauge the overall cheeseball factor.)

Hi guys, I'm here if you have any questions to ask. And please call me Peter (or you can stick with Dudebun if you prefer  ).