The only mystery that remains is the 123RF, it doesn`t show the earning, but if I go to the site and log in, after a refresh on earnings it will show. But when I restart firefox it does not show up.
tamas
tamas
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts Menu
Quote from: eggshell on October 12, 2010, 12:37Show us your rejected image, so we can discuss more precise about your anger.
I got my first "Limited commercial value" rejection today on a credit card super macro shot . Looking through the newest images on that same subject I stumbled upon this port - http://www.shutterstock.com/results.mhtml#page=1&gallery_id=434212
I was amazed by the poor photography - lighting , composition ( the lack of ) , subject choice ...
These are pretty recent submissions , not some relics from the dawn of microstock . These are not 10-15 accidently approved shots . There's no way this port was built going through the normal approval process . What's the point of raising the quality bar if this kind of work still finds its way in agency's catalog ?
.
Quote from: Tomboy2290 on March 04, 2010, 20:11I remember when Snapvillage closed they had $0.75 to pay for me and they did. I got $0.75 on my PayPal account.
I removed my images and sent a request to close my account a few days before the site was shut down. I had $3.80 owing . . . I wonder if I'll get it?
Quote from: gostwyck on March 02, 2010, 14:02Yes, I received my final payment about 3-4 days after they closed.
Quote from: donding on March 01, 2010, 15:46If you don`t save your JPGs as RGB, your work will look like on Thinkstock, with weird colour style. Try for yourself to save the same vector as RGB and the as CMYK, and you`ll see the difference.
Thanks that's the info. that's what I was looking for. So work CMYK for vector but save jpg as RGB.