If anyone want to contact Craig, you can try to contact him using Linkedin and Facebook account ( https://www.linkedin.com/in/craig-lillard-884b3551 and https://www.facebook.com/craig.lillard )

The problem is that Craig has shut down his email and it is impossible to discuss with him right now. I don't think they are looking to sell anything otherwise they should be open to discuss and communicate easily about their company. When Stockeon closed last year, at least I was able to discuss with Szymon about invest in the infrastructure and/or the content. (also Szymon paid everyone before he closed the website, which was very honest and serious)

The only information I found is here : http://setexasrecord.com/stories/510618089-recent-patent-infringement-cases-filed-in-the-eastern-district-of-texas

Uniloc USA Inc. et al v. Inmagine Corp. et al
Uniloc USA Inc. et al v. Revostock Inc. et al

Uniloc USA Inc. is a Texas corporation having a principal place of business in Irvine, Calif. Uniloc Singapore Private Ltd. is a Singapore corporation.

The defendants are Inmagine Corp. LLC d/b/a Inmagine.com d/b/a Photosubscribe.com d/b/a Imagehit.com d/b/a Inspirestock Inc. d/b/a Inspirestock.com and 123RF Ltd. d/b/a 123RF USA Ltd. d/b/a 123RF.com d/b/a 123Royaltyfree.com d/b/a 123RF.net, Revostock Inc. d/b/a Revostock.com and V.R. Media Resources Inc. d/b/a Revolution Stock Media.

The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 7,099,849 issued Feb. 6, 1996, for Integrated Media Management and Rights Distribution Apparatus.

Uniloc is asking the court to issue an injunction preventing the defendants from further infringing on the '849 patent and for an award of damages, costs, expenses, attorney's fees and interest.

Andrew P. Tower, Michael J. Collins and Johnathan K. Yazdani of Collins, Edmonds, Pogorzelski, Schlather & Tower in Houston; James L. Etheridge of Etheridge Law Group in Southlake; and T. John Ward Jr. and J. Wesley Hill of Ward & Smith Law Firm in Longview are representing the plaintiffs.

A jury trial is requested.

U.S. District Judge Leonard Davis is assigned to the case.

Case No. 6:12-cv-00093; 6:12-cv-00094

Hi everyone,

I just find this discussion about Revostock, and this great forum about our living. Thank you for sharing all these informations!

I just want to tell my experience. I always trusted Craig as Revostock is the first marketplace where I sold my items. I also had always a great communication with him.

Like many other producers I was getting paid time to time (some 2K withdraws) from 2014. It didn't covered all my earnings and the royalties dues increased to 10K. I decided to support at 100% Revo and didn't removed my content. When they closed the website the amount due was close to 12K.

So I think it is an inverted pyramid system, as big authors like FluxVFX were funding the other producers ;-) I still can't believe what happened, and I don't understand why the content, the infrastructure does not interest investors. It is a shame to loose years of efforts due to a patent troll.

I am not based in USA and I don't know what rights do we have on this. But if someone is taking action count me in.

- Florian Godard