MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Microbe

Pages: [1]
1
Hi guys,
I have been working with Science Photo Library for almost 2 years and I am satisfied with results, so you definetely should try it. I have two accounts there - with exlusive images, where I get 50% from sales, and with non-exclusive images, which I also submit to many other microstocks, and I have 40% from sales. They sell images not only themselves but submit them to many partners, including even Shutterstock (offset collection) and Fotolia, and if you also submit there, you should tell them not to submit there, to avoid double submission. Because of so many partners earnings also vary a lot, from near 0.5 pounds to 200 pounds per image. But I submit images as RF, you may select 'rights managed' and prices would be higher.

2
 
Quote
Yep I do wonder if SS is the best site for you aren't there some more specialist sellers?
More specialised is Science Photo Library, but I still have more sales on SS

3
Fortunately, my topic is rather specific and there are no so many competitors. Mostly 'similar images' were directing to my own similar images :)

4
Yes, I also think so, but some time ago everything worked correctly, so this change is not a good change.

5
Hi there,
I noticed that 'similar images' panel works totally wrong showing images similar by colors but not by content. For example, for this my image https://www.shutterstock.com/ru/pic-480829915/stock-photo-human-papillomaviruses-on-surface-of-skin-or-mucous-membrane-a-virus-which-causes-warts-located-mainly-on-hands-and-feet-some-strains-infect-genitals-and-can-cause-cervical-cancer-3d-il.html?src=aexXzQVXFYC1cEdI7CpqzQ-1-5 (Human papilloma virus which causes warts) it gives set of 'similar' images with purple berries and flowers. If some person is searching for a similar virus, he gots nothing information from such 'similar images'. The same with all my other images. I wrote to SS support but there is no reaction.
Does anybody also notice this?

6
General Stock Discussion / Re: Science Photo Library
« on: March 16, 2016, 09:22 »
Okay guys, I will describe my own short experience of work with Science Photo Library, may be it will be useful for somebody. I like to draw 3D illustrations of microbes. Mainly I sell my images and video clips through Shutterstock and Fotolia. I also tried 123rf and Depositphotos but they gave so low earning that finally I stopped spending time on them. At the end of last year I decided to try SPL too (thanks to this forum!). I was ready to draw some exclusive images and although I did not have many, I decided to try.
They proposed two types of contracts - exclusive for new images (according to it I will get 50% from sales) and non-exclusive for my old images (with 40%). With video clips the same. They wanted that I upload all my Shutterstock portfolio as soon as possible but the main limiation for me was the size of images - I made 3000*2000 px for Shutterstock but they wanted 4 times bigger (6000*4000 or 5000*5000) and I had to rerender them, so uploaded overall near 40 exclusive and 70 non-exclusive.
I was given my own photo editor and video editor, they check now my submissions and guide me. At beginning all my submission were very fastly uploaded on-site (I was really impressed because Shutterstock takes 2 weeks to upload my clips). But then they started to work rather slow, and I am not so happy with this. My latest submissions from beginning of February are still not uploaded to site.

To summarise, what I like:
1) I can sell there my non-exclusive images from Shutterstock also,
2) my photo and video editors give me useful suggestions regarding what else is good to draw,
3) images/clips of other artists are really interesting and studying them gives me lot of new ideas,
4) they send my works also to Alamy and other agencies.

What I don't like:
1) they work too slow, when submissions are checked for several months I really loose interest,
2) for the first 2 months my earnings are rather low. Only few my exclusive images were sold at the lowest resolution, so I even don't know whether there is a sence to spend time on sending non-exclusive images,
3) my computor is not so potent and large size of images which they request slow down all my work.
At beginning I was so impressed and excited that was going to spend all my next efforts on SPL but now, I am still going to continue to submit some images and clips, however, main my efforts I am again directing on Shutterstock and Fotolia.

I will keep posting my next impressions as well  :)


7
General Stock Discussion / Re: Science Photo Library
« on: March 12, 2016, 08:10 »
Hi ScottishPhotographer,
I am looking into producing images for submission to Science Photo Library and was wondering if there are any contributors here who work with this agency.

In particular I am interested in what kind of (annual) RPI is typical and what kind of portfolio size is needed to achieve sizeable returns (i.e. $1,000 per month). I will of course need to upgrade my camera as I believe they require images to be at least 12 megapixels uninterpolated.

I have a background in science so have some idea of the types of images that could be submitted.

Do you have now any impressions from work with Science Photo Library?

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors