1
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Thread for Deletion
« on: October 01, 2011, 23:27 »
I can see that it's a bit rough here with quite a few unpolished egos. Will stay around, just have to learn rules of conduct.

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
1
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Thread for Deletion« on: October 01, 2011, 23:27 »
I can see that it's a bit rough here with quite a few unpolished egos. Will stay around, just have to learn rules of conduct.
![]() 2
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Thread for Deletion« on: October 01, 2011, 22:06 »
Perhaps you did, Stacy, but obviously many people thought I was just so inclined to show them my precious images.
![]() 4
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Thread for Deletion« on: September 30, 2011, 21:56 »
I removed the examples because initially I thought this would be a group effort to show the obvious flaw of the system. However, it rather looked like a one man show where I hold the stage and others are either cheering or wooing. I didn't like that. I showed about 20 different examples of photos which were in Agency collection but belong better to the Dollar Bin, and all other people showed 3 or 4 of which some were fairly decent images. I assume most other people were just too afraid to contribute to this thread in a meaningful way (with a few exceptions). If anyone feels this should be continued feel free to do so and I will contribute. To make it perfectly clear - no, no one threatened me or anything of that sort. I still think all of what I initially said, I just don't think there's enough good will amongst the fellow contributors to act on this issue and I don't think I should be the only black sheep.
![]() 6
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Agency Influx on Istock« on: September 30, 2011, 09:07 »Well increased rejections, fewer acceptances to premium collections, no lypse assignments, and any number of things Yeah, that makes sense.. but even if I do get a rejection here and there still majority of the team are beautiful kind hearted people who probably feel the same way I do but just prefer to stay under the radar. I don't see them rejecting my images because I stated the obvious. As for the Lypse's, oh man, after the Tokyo one I couldn't care less for not being invited for the rest of my life and beyond. ![]() 7
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Agency Influx on Istock« on: September 30, 2011, 08:39 »
My decision to resign is not the subject of this topic so let's not go into that. I am raising here a valid concern and any half decent person to just look at these and many other examples will see no reason to punish me for criticizing the obvious double standard policy. Istock's success is in my best interest and I am doing what is in my power to point to flaws of the system that have potential to affect this success. And we are not in middle ages, there are written agreements that define obligations of contracted parties. I have not nor do I intend to breach any of my obligations so I don't see what "punishment" could possibly await me.
11
iStockPhoto.com / Thread for Deletion« on: September 30, 2011, 02:36 »
I tried something, it didn't work. Mods, please delete this thread. Thanks.
12
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Micromanaging the istock Forums« on: March 11, 2011, 14:10 »
OMG, so our "parent" is not the worst of the lot.. there's even domestic violence elsewhere.
![]() ![]() 13
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Micromanaging the istock Forums« on: March 11, 2011, 11:28 »
Thanks for your welcome.
Don't blame the people there (I'm not saying you did). They have families to feed and some of them are much more dependable on the job than some of us who resigned were. Of the people you listed I do see some admins and fellow inspectors have the badge no more so it might be a wider wave rather than me being a lonely example. Don't know, just commenting what I see.. And even what I know I should not and will not share, for obvious reasons. 14
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Micromanaging the istock Forums« on: March 11, 2011, 09:31 »
So the IS forums have become dull and lousy because you're all here!
![]()
Pages: [1]
|
|