|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Secretariat
Pages: [1]
1
« on: October 03, 2008, 07:20 »
Hope yuri don't show his workflow very detail, I don't know what happen if many people copying yury workflow, difference style of editing and shoting make stockphoto industry more interesting.
My money is on him not showing it in too much detail....but he does have to address all the questions about how he brings about the end result in his coming videos.
2
« on: September 13, 2008, 12:16 »
Newby should be newbie ;-) I was thinking "Newby discussion?!" 
3
« on: July 29, 2008, 14:39 »
I have just cleaned my camera with with Sensorswap and Eclipse E2 solution from Photographic Solutions - I had three specks that just could be blown or shaken off the sensor (I have a D300, btw).
If you cant blow them off, i wont hesitate to recommend this approach - if youre careful to follow the (simple) guidelines, you really cant mess up. I had to do three passes, btw, tough little buggers :-)
4
« on: July 07, 2008, 15:02 »
Frankly, Lior - 11.75 $?
5
« on: July 03, 2008, 03:12 »
Either way, the numbers say that Canon has lost market share to Nikon and Sony in the last year, we'll have to see how they do over the next fiscal year.
Reminds me, didn't we see some black lenses on the sidelines at EURO 08? And not all grey lenses
6
« on: June 30, 2008, 16:23 »
Took me by surprise, the current lineup - in the upper echelons - is very close to each other now.
I guess they mean to really bring it to Canon, with the D3x presumably coming soon too.
7
« on: June 15, 2008, 12:20 »
A few microstockers might even regret they became involved in this ridiculous rebellion.
There will be consequences I'm almost certain. (hehehe)
Gee, do you think Fotolia will ban us from Shutterstock?
8
« on: April 06, 2008, 17:45 »
yeah, but when they uspize, there is loss of quality. i guess.
Correct me if Im missing something here but its my impression they upsize your image regardless of orginal size.
That is true for the most part, but they don't upsize images that are above a certain megapixel size. I'm not sure exactly what that limit is , but I believe that it is somewhere around 16 MP.
Ok, thanks, it makes sense. But I am a little shocked to see a 9.1 MP image of mine get supersized to 36 MP! It makes me wonder whats best, to submit a 16MP image (provided your camera outputs that, I dont mean homegrown upsizing) and thereby missing out on the 36 MP option or the other way around.
9
« on: April 06, 2008, 17:39 »
My two cents - hardly two cents, actually - on this is that I like Lightrooms noise reduction: I know some people complain about it being too conservative (as in not enough) but since I only shoot low iso's (or dont care anyway if its high iso!), i think the luminance noise cleans up really neatly.
10
« on: April 06, 2008, 17:29 »
I too agree that the first two should have been accepted. As for the last one, I think the strawberries will have to go, especially if theyre any other color than red as here (Im thinking you played with the colors here), as they mess up the composition: what are you supposed to look at, the strawberries or the ink?
That said, I too agree that fotolias rejection reasons are bad - in fact, the worst ive seen. But at the end of the day, its their privilege to reject and its not their job to teach us how to be better photographers. Their rejections are either unhelpful or meaningless but I cant really blame them - its their site, not ours. I think - and I suppose its only natural - that we tend to focus on yourselves and the buyers and that whole relationship, and forget about the "middle man" or the distributor.
11
« on: April 06, 2008, 09:14 »
yeah, but when they uspize, there is loss of quality. i guess.
Correct me if Im missing something here but its my impression they upsize your image regardless of orginal size.
12
« on: April 01, 2008, 16:48 »
I like it.
Some humour is always nice in this business - would boring, correct iStock have done it?
13
« on: March 26, 2008, 18:38 »
I just tried uploading a couple of times, and got a red x instead my image. Is this related maybe?
14
« on: March 26, 2008, 16:19 »
Just had a bunch rejected with the "Type of photograph" rejection. I have to say I disagree rather a lot with them! It seems like the reviewer hits that "Type of photograph" button when he/she just doesnt feel like it today....
Btw...whats peoples experience with resubmitting? I did it once and had the image accepted - I had actually forgotten it had been rejected and only saw that it was "missing" from my portfolio, so to say.
15
« on: March 24, 2008, 06:46 »
A newbie reviewer....you can train them as much as you want, theres still no telling whats gonna happen when they are turned loose on the queue!
16
« on: March 21, 2008, 08:07 »
I use my new D300 on neutral settings and sharpness set to 2. Initial impression is that the pictures are sharper than the D200 at the same settings.
I haven't noticed any improvement in detail or color but then I always apply saturation in photoshop rather than in-camera.
All in all, I'd say the D300 gets the same or slightly better quality images at 12mp compared to the D200, but there is very little in it.
I'm using Lo1 iso which is equivalent to iso100.
I have two questions. Do you always shoot in RAW and do you see a decrease in any way by using the Lo1 iso? Because for myself I always use the native 200iso in case that the quality can be affected. At the same time there's the D300 review who just come at Dpreview... there's the link.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond300/page18.asp
Sorry I missed the post last time
Supposedly, the Lo-settings are paid for in decreased dynamic range. I avoid it and only use iso200 as lowest setting: what noise I find is either from incorrect exposure or because I have turned NR completely off in camera - I dont really know if I should, but I like to see all noise disappear at the slide of a slider!
17
« on: March 06, 2008, 18:30 »
For me, this the first day, 27 sales from a portfolio of 10 so far (I guess the day is soon over). One topseller but all bar one has sold at least once. Im very happy with it, sure beats the 1 download in 6 months I have at iStock!
Ill of course be interested to see when sales start dropping off. One thing Im wondering in that connection: as I understand, older pics will stop selling relatively fast - but will new uploads help the old ones a bit (e.g., by buyers having a look at your portfolio) or are they basically dead in the water?
18
« on: March 04, 2008, 15:24 »
I just got in, 10 out of 10.  I suppose theyre half-sleep, because frankly im not over-awed with my own current abilities I applied after reading this thread and i got a response in , what, 3-4 hours.
19
« on: January 28, 2008, 13:54 »
My guess is that Nikon will keep the D40 as the starter DSLR and combine features of the D80 and D300 to make a new model that will compete with the new EOS 450D.
Maybe a D90 with...
- D80-size body
- 12MP CMOS from the D300
- 3" LCD w/Liveview
- Mostly everything else carried over
I agree that thats certainly coming but not now. The D80 came out about a year after the D200 and I suppose the same timeframe is logical for the D300 and D90. It does seem to be the smart business decision but who knows. I myself am getting the D300. Theres also the question of Nikons production capability: the factories at Sendai and in Thailand is supposedly maxed out at the moment (I believe its something like 12.000 D3's and 60.000 D300's per month, respectively). By the way, thats also why we're probably not going see another FX soon: the demand for the D3 is far from being met and theres really nowhere for a new FX to be produced. Besides, FX sensors are expensive to make. EDIT: I just found Thom Hogans predictions for 2008, I'll quote them here for what theyre worth: D3x: announced as early as spring, certainly before the 2008 Olympics (August).
D3 body, new Sony FX sensor
Certainly over 20mp if the Sony sensor is used (there were other sensors tested at a lower megapixel level, most notably 18mp, but I'm guessing that we won't see them).
Probably max 5fps.
D80x: announced early 2008, ship shortly after. Could be named D90.
The 12-bit Sony version (IMX021) of the 12mp sensor used in the D300
15-segment AF
D40/D40x replacements: announced mid-2008, ship immediately
This is the tough one to predict, but I'm guessing 10mp, Live View
Change in AF system, but to what?
As of late December 2007, the D40x production has stopped (i.e. final D40x models made), making this prediction even more likely
What, no smaller FX body?
Not in 2008; 2009 at the earliest. First off, Nikon won't be able to make D3/D3x sensors fast enough, so adding another FX sensor to the mix is likely not in the cards for 2008.
Question for next year: 12mp or 18mp? Given the D3's success, I'm now saying 12mp. I'd be happy with that. http://www.bythom.com/2008predictions.htm
20
« on: January 27, 2008, 22:18 »
5D is definately an attractive option. But I'm carrying the Nikon flag so I'm pretty anxious to see what's coming out at PMA. If it's only a D40X replacement then I'm picking up a D300.
I believe it's the D80 that is due for replacement. It's not competitive against the 40D or K20D anymore. The new one will most likely have the D300 sensor and viewfinder, but in a plastic body like the D80.
The rumors does speak pretty strongly for a D40X replacement as Nazdravie says. And just as the argument against a 'FX D300' - it would effectively be a D3 - so I think the model you mention would be too close to a D300, eating into sales while its selling like mad at the moment. Nikon should know better than compete against itself - but, we'll see in a weeks time 
Pages: [1]
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
