MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Leontura

Pages: [1]
1

Yes, it's much better for a CEO to spend his time wisely! (insert sarcasm) Apparently John Griffin should be spending his time devising a scheme to raise prices on buyers while lowering commissions for contributors like so many other CEO's are doing these days! What were you thinking Mr. John Griffin coming up with a tactic to drive people to your site and get everyones attention?!?!? (end of sarcasm)

Snaprender

One second... Cutcaster making a ton of pointless mistakes is somehow excused by the fact that other agencies keep lowering our cut? You know, it is possible to be competant AND not lower royalties. It sounds like youd be happy with any screw up as long as your percentage stays intact!

2
Bizarre. Im not in a rush to contribute to a company which seems to come up with policies on the back of a beer mat.
"I did research on the Vetta trademark and istock in fact did NOT have it registered anywhere in the world but had a claim to it (according to them) due to common law."
So you did something which half of the people here thought was probably illegal but didnt think to consult a lawyer first? Come on now it would have cost you a few hundred bucks. Just call up a copyright lawyer and ask- one hour session.
"To be completely honest, I found the whole process of creating a collection and the legal tussle that ensued to be very interesting, a bit fun, a bit scary due to some perceived threats"
Im sure contributors will be glad to know that the CEO of the company is using his time wisely!
I think "Betta" is also pretty bad. It sounds cheap. "Premiere Collection" or something similar would have been a lot better.

3

so , what if, CC wants to give Getty a heave-ho, and do what they did.
what are you IS people so afraid of?
are you really afraid CC will cut into your breadline?  if so, why the fuss?


I dont think anyone is afraid of cutcaster. The reason people are posting is because its such a hilariously bad name! I think most people cant believe anyone could come up with something so ridiculous and actually put it into practice without realising.

Leontura, I so agree with you. Betta than Vetta is such a hilariously bad name.
It sounds just as hilariously bad as Yahoo - Twitter - Google - Flickr -
you are so right.


Really? Those other memorable but silly names sound as bad to you as "betta than vetta"? Would you prefer "better than microsoft" to "google"? *shrug* you must be seeing something that Im not. Maybe you should change your name to "betta than yuri" before anyone else does.

4

so , what if, CC wants to give Getty a heave-ho, and do what they did.
what are you IS people so afraid of?
are you really afraid CC will cut into your breadline?  if so, why the fuss?


I dont think anyone is afraid of cutcaster. The reason people are posting is because its such a hilariously bad name! I think most people cant believe anyone could come up with something so ridiculous and actually put it into practice without realising.

5
"Irish for mountaintop"?  Cmon, that reads like an Onion news story...

I have to agree with Sean on this. Seriously... What the heck?! There are reasons shutterstock didnt call itself "better than istock". Its got to be a joke... It's pretty funny though I give them that.

6
Off Topic / Re: A month in Mumbai
« on: July 07, 2008, 10:01 »
People see what they want to see.
If you go there seeking faith and the way to nirvana, possibly you will find it. I am a hard core realist. I see the suffering, disease, poverty and also the extreme wealth of the few and wonder why it has to be that way.
Their government is to blame.
Precisely- people see what they want to see. So why didn't you go there wanting to see a fascinating culture which is one of the most different from our own? I'm also a hardcore realist- I have no interest at all in the hippie thing. But their religion isnt simply "people with many arms" or "loving each other" but much more complicated philosophical issues. As an athiest I still found it very interesting. One thing I didn't go to see is the political situation or a decent economy. If I was interested in that, I wouldn't have gone to India.

That's funny about the lizards on the runway- very Indian :) You don't take pleasure in this culture? I'd find that amusing. Yeah it'd be a little irritating getting somewhere late, but at least you have something to talk about when you arrive!

Yaknow nosaya- you may not have enjoyed yourself out there, but youre far more interesting now. :) I bet you have more perspective and I bet you appreciate your situation a lot more. Sounds like a worthwhile month to me.

7
Off Topic / Re: A month in Mumbai
« on: July 06, 2008, 22:11 »
Interesting photos. I spent a long time in Bombay too- a couple of months, plus another couple for other parts of india. Yeah, I got really sick. The poverty was harsh, and the heat was extreme. But next time you go I recommend you try to see the positive side too- because India has a lot that we can learn from, although it's rather hidden behind a sometimes-harsh surface. The people are very interesting- the religious aspect is very strong and well worth taking to to soak up. I went there on holiday and ended up finding a course in website development. (It was 200 dollars for one-to-one tuition for over a month- and it was very good.) One of my teachers was a Parsi priest who would come in some days after waking up at 3am to perform the ritual of putting the dead on the roof of the temple for the sun to burn. They used to have the vultures eat the bodies, but with the lack of vultures these days in Bombay he tells me that they now use well-place giant magnifying glasses to burn the bodies in that city. The conversations you have with regular indians can sometimes be very interesting- in fact, Ive had conversations about life, death, and religion on long-distance train journeys with peasants who had rarely travelled, which were far more interesting than the usual "pint down the pub" talk I have at home. When you start getting into the belief systems of Indians, you really see how deep the whole thing is. The architecture is also quite fantastic in places (although Bombay is more western and perhaps not as interesting as somewhere like Old Delhi which is fantastic in places). Delhi has a good 4 buildings that are about as amazing as the taj mahal. There's also the energy of the place- you don't get bored there, which for me is a big bonus. The hussle and bussle is quite extreme.
So, where I can understand what youre saying- and a good half of the people who go to india end up hating it- I do think that with the right attitude, you can get a lot from it. But still, I wouldnt recommend it to anyone unless they genuinely already have a big interest in the place. It's a tough trip, with many down-sides.

Still, it feels good to be back eh?! I remember- after India I went to Malaysia which of course isnt particularly wealthy... It felt so so comfortable it was great :) A complete relief!

8
Off Topic / Re: Japanese name for my robot
« on: March 02, 2008, 02:58 »
Kawaii means cute in Japanese. Pronounced "Ka Why Yee". Kwai means scary so thats good too. Kawaiikai? Kwaikai? Maybe that's too much... It's a nice robot anyway.

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors