1
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff
« on: September 29, 2010, 14:00 »
wooops, wasn't fast enough with keywording...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
1
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff« on: September 29, 2010, 14:00 »
wooops, wasn't fast enough with keywording...
2
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff« on: September 27, 2010, 12:41 »
I'm in! Thanks *upload*
3
Dreamstime.com / Re: Hell of rejections on "well covered..." blah« on: June 07, 2009, 15:27 »I will not comment the previous posts, but as this is on topic, would like to tell you that we're doing consistency monitoring constantly and that I have asked special attention to be given to the "Well covered" reason for the near future. I'm sure it will Thank you!! 4
Dreamstime.com / Re: Upload limit increased at Dreamstime« on: June 01, 2009, 12:52 »
Great!! I wish I had something to upload
5
Shutterstock.com / Re: IRS Withholding Taxes for non U.S. Submitters« on: May 30, 2009, 05:33 »
haven't received a single email from them yet!!
This update sounds good and it would be interesting to know how many sales are made by US-buyers. 20, 50 or 80%? 6
Shutterstock.com / Re: IRS Withholding Taxes for non U.S. Submitters« on: May 29, 2009, 09:45 »
Did you perhaps post the link to the petition somewhere? I think this is what they hated the most. This is my only explanation why I was banned myself... EDIT: they suspended the account of the user who started the petition. 7
Shutterstock.com / Re: IRS Withholding Taxes for non U.S. Submitters« on: May 28, 2009, 18:10 »In defense of SS, they have almost immediately provided a whole forum just to discuss and try to reconcile this problem. where I cannot post, since they baned me And I think I was not alone because I really wasn't among the most emotional posters there. I did not even get a message telling me why exactly I'm baned. Perhaps because I posted a link to the petition there when another user asked what petition everyone was talking about. I don't think that they should treat contributors that way. Especially when they themselves have problems keeping control of their feelings. 8
Shutterstock.com / Re: IRS Withholding Taxes for non U.S. Submitters« on: May 28, 2009, 14:07 »There-s an interesting post in one of the threads by CSProductions ... etc ...I strongly recommend the book "Cracking the Code," available from www.LostHorizons.com. lol 9
Shutterstock.com / Re: IRS Withholding Taxes for non U.S. Submitters« on: May 28, 2009, 13:05 »I was just banned from the Shutterstock forum. Why I don't know - I kept the tone clean. me too! But my port is still there. I don't understand it. Yes, I complained, but hey, who would not?? I did not insult anyone!! 10
Shutterstock.com / Re: IRS Withholding Taxes for non U.S. Submitters« on: May 28, 2009, 11:53 »
I don't remember that I said anything rude, but I'm baned too now
11
Shutterstock.com / Re: IRS Withholding Taxes for non U.S. Submitters« on: May 28, 2009, 10:56 »
It would seam someone is banned from the SS forums already.... I really don't like how they handle this!
12
Shutterstock.com / Re: IRS Withholding Taxes for non U.S. Submitters« on: May 28, 2009, 09:55 »
perhaps he got rude out of despair. It would appear he does not see any other choice and now watches how the contributors threaten to leave or leave already. This would ruin Shutterstock and he is well aware of that.
13
Shutterstock.com / Re: IRS Withholding Taxes for non U.S. Submitters« on: May 28, 2009, 08:21 »
I get the feeling they don't want foreign contributors anymore! It really sounds like that! Especially the really rude reaction by Shutterstock!
Seams I really need to delete my images in the end... 14
Shutterstock.com / Re: Does SS have a 'scout' equivalent?« on: May 27, 2009, 12:51 »
hm yes I perhaps will make some minor changes. Although I think the images are ok already... And then re-submit..
15
Shutterstock.com / Re: Does SS have a 'scout' equivalent?« on: May 27, 2009, 09:32 »
is it allowed at SS to simply upload a rejected image again?
16
Dreamstime.com / Re: I love the new DT search engine !« on: May 05, 2009, 14:29 »
Wonder, why this was not sieved out by "too many of the same..."-rejections! 17
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock Content to Sell on Photos.com and JupiterUnlimited« on: May 04, 2009, 10:08 »
I'll just opt out and forget about it.
18
Dreamstime.com / Re: Hell of rejections on "well covered..." blah« on: May 01, 2009, 11:39 »
I know, there is not much - meaning no - copy space in it and it has too much contrast for a background image. Nevertheless it sold...
19
Dreamstime.com / Re: Hell of rejections on "well covered..." blah« on: May 01, 2009, 11:02 »I just uploaded a flower pic It wasn't of course, although I had hopes, since istock and shutterstock accepted it and I already had some sales on it . In addition I received a "lack of composition" Here is my lack of composition: 20
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime rejection. Need opinion on vector!« on: April 24, 2009, 15:52 »
yes, why not make two images of it? A shield and a dragon?
21
General Photography Discussion / Re: Microstock Offices - Google Street View« on: April 24, 2009, 12:35 »
That is very cool!!
But how could google get all the property releases and model releases? 22
iStockPhoto.com / Re: How are the non-exclusives doing under best match 2.0?« on: April 23, 2009, 06:39 »
yes, amazing, 4 downloads over night!? If there was more to it than coincidence that would be great
23
General Stock Discussion / Re: Stock buyers are geeks...are you?« on: April 21, 2009, 08:24 »
lol, why would someone post in his name such helpful information? He obviously is not a bot, he is replying to postings in this and other threads
The thread got deleted on istock?? 24
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Color paler on istock site« on: April 20, 2009, 15:54 »
strange! Yes your istock image looks less saturated and has less contrast. What RGB do you use? sRGB, Adobe RGB, whatever? sRGB is the most common and I always use it since it is supported by most browsers so it looks the same in all browsers.
EDIT: istock seams to whatever color palette you use convert it to sRGB. Shutterstock and Dreamstime do not. This is an Adobe RGB image I uploaded and the one on SS looks paler since at least my firefox does not "translate" Adobe RGB: 25
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Overfiltering...I think don't understand it« on: April 20, 2009, 13:49 »
yes I only do this with the images I like the most. I strongly consider it with this image which got rejected for overfiltering and lightning. Well I suppose the overfiltering is the Earth and the lightning is the white balance, which I intentionally kept warm... I printed the pic and I think it would lose with a different white balance and the Earth is supposed to be there... no resubmit btw!!
I'll probably write exactly that to scout. But still not sure
Pages: [1] 2
|
|