MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - uploaderz

Pages: [1] 2
1

Maybe Tyler was partying too hard and hit the wrong button by mistake.  8)

LOL!  Somebody get that man an espresso or some Red Bull ASAP! ;D

good idea with the espresso.. i think i need it... this could take a while

2
sorry guys.  I did an update and things got screwed up.  I'm working on getting things back to normal ASAP.

3
Dreamstime.com / Re: New Pricing from Dreamstime
« on: December 15, 2009, 10:13 »
yeah, hopefully SS responds.

Nice update from DT!

4
General - Top Sites / Re: 123 took spot #6
« on: October 06, 2009, 17:09 »
they are always jumping around.  Last month it was bigstock on top.. now it is 123 again.

5
Site Related / Re: Boxes with Red x
« on: February 19, 2009, 04:16 »
yeah, that looks better for me!

6
General Stock Discussion / Re: The Great Washing Out
« on: January 24, 2009, 17:24 »
Overall this industry will probably work best for everyone once price points match the amount of effort and expense put into creating the work.   


I don't expect that will ever happen. There's now too many photographers and no barriers to entry. There will always be a photographer willing to do more for less, whether because it's worthwhile in their country, because they're just getting started, or because they're doing it for fun.

Jim Pickerell wrote a post on the relationship of price and production costs recently (subscription required: http://www.selling-stock.com/?p=3756) and I'm sure he won't mind me paraphrasing his main reasons why they will never be related: 1. Buyers make buying decisions based on the value of the image to them; 2. The value to a buyer is completely unrelated to the production costs; and 3. Buyers' perception of value is affected by other choices (competition). (he also qualifies that this relates only to stock, not assignment photography)

What do you think?


I think youre too negative there Lee.
There are barriers and that is skill.  It has been proven that there is a definite market for microstock priced imagery.  Business and people need / want pictures that are cheap.  But wether the picture costs $.50, $3.00 or even $10.00 is pretty insignificant, they are all cheap.  The photographers working as pro microstock photographers are going to upload to the sites selling their pics for $5.00 and the buyers are going to go to the sites that get all the pro photographers images.  Those $5.00 sites will get picky with their pictures acceptance and the amateur will be pushed out and the market will be mature.

Sure there will always be amatuers and part timers.. that is the beauty of stock, but they will mostly be active on the sites that accept their images,.... perhaps the same sites that sell images for $.50 .. people will buy there, but most people will buy from the sites that get all the good images even though they are sold for a (very modest) premium.

... This is another thread that will be fun to look at in about 5 years time :)

7
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia sales? how have yours been lately?
« on: December 11, 2008, 06:38 »
mind have been increasing nicely lately

8
Site Related / Re: Problem Editing
« on: November 28, 2008, 17:19 »
testing test

9
Site Related / Re: Problems editing posts
« on: November 17, 2008, 08:27 »
the preview and spellcheck work for me now in firefox and explorer.  Great.

10
iStockPhoto.com / Re: best match have changed
« on: September 13, 2008, 03:26 »
looks like i better start uploading again to take advantage of this :)

11
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Canon 5d mark II / 7D
« on: September 11, 2008, 15:23 »
evil canon :)  they are soooo toying with us :)

12
General Stock Discussion / Re: Wedding Photography Resources
« on: September 11, 2008, 15:21 »
couldnt have said it better myself sharpley.

I discussed with one other microstocker who has done a number of weddings, and we both agreed, that we didnt think we had broken even yet after a year or more.

There is WAY more overhead... getting sample albums, getting album supplies and thank you cards to show your wedding couple, an extra camera body and enough top notch lenses, perhaps a fash or two, pocket wizards if you want remote flashes, a car that will get you there and not break down, maybe advertising, updated website.. etc. etc... it is definatly do-able but is a lot of work and expense. 

I much prefer microstock photography and only take weddings now when they fall on my lap, and have raised my prices enough that I think it is worth it (i think anyhow... i have to look at my prices again :) )

13
General Stock Discussion / Re: subscriptions
« on: August 02, 2008, 17:06 »
Well put

14
StockXpert.com / Re: Referrals
« on: July 10, 2008, 03:07 »
which site are you talking about?

15
123RF / Re: You got bonus?
« on: July 07, 2008, 16:34 »
yeah, seems like a good deal.  I hope we get a bit of an income boost this month.

16
of course everyone would prefer one sale of $50 over 9 sales, or 10 sales of $5.00 the think with micro is, or in speaking in regards to alamy...

i get 10,000 sales at $.38 in the same time i get 1 sale at $380 at alamy
so simple math tells me my images earn more for me at shutterstock.

17
Istock has an exclusive Royalty free contract, so no you cant sell royalty free images at alamy, but yes you CAN still sell rights managed images at Alamy or other sites.

18
i think this is a tough question, because eventually you probably WILL reach a payout.. but how long is too long.  I waited over a year for my canstock payment.. and FINALLY got it the other week.

19
you could also try a modeling agency.. there might be people interested in time for prints, or perhaps a little bit of cash.  If you manage to take some good pics though, you could pretty safly spend $100.  If each image brings in $10.00\year or so, you will only need 10 pictures to pay for the model.  on a couple hour shoot, you could probably get 50-200 shots.

20
123RF / Re: How is everyone doing on 123RF
« on: May 16, 2006, 12:38 »
i think they are progressing.

Their individual sales are a nice addition.  They also seem to be rather sporatic, some days with really good downloads and some days with pretty meager downloads, but every day something... which perhaps points towards that they are getting better... perhaps the good days will soon become more of a norm.

21
if views are directly related to sales (in most cases) isn't the sales a good enough stat to see what is popular.

22
Bigstock.com / Re: Bigstock has lost all of my respect
« on: May 16, 2006, 12:36 »
hmm.. well then you were right before.. wasn't there a thread about a nasty reviewer..

that is odd about the server things.. i haven't ever had problems logging in.. not sure about reviews though, i think they have been going fine, but i haven't really kept track of how long they have been taking.

23
Crestock.com / Re: Crestock - any action
« on: May 11, 2006, 14:57 »
well that is a little bit of action... not sure it is enough to convince me yet though.

24
congrats on your first sale :)

25
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock approval que
« on: May 02, 2006, 03:16 »
exactly

Pages: [1] 2

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors