MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - treywalker

Pages: [1]
1
Newbie Discussion / Re: Models Required for Success?
« on: February 01, 2010, 13:47 »
You may find this posting from Ellen Boughn interesting.



Great link, thanks!

2
Newbie Discussion / Re: Models Required for Success?
« on: February 01, 2010, 13:43 »
If you're very good at what you do, you'll be successful.  Models, or no models, concepts or no.

Being all analytical and trying to roll out theories and such takes all the fun out of it. ;)

Ha!  You bring up a good point.  It's a flaw of mine, however, if you ask my employer they would consider it a positive trait :)  With that being said, I am looking at microstock as a business rather than a hobby, so I am working through my business case.  Granted, it does take some of the fun out of it, but I hope that by doing this up front work I am preparing myself for years of "work" that I can consider fun.

Regarding the 'very good', I agree.  I just wonder if I'll be 'very good' or just 'good'.  I tend to lean towards 'good', so I'll have to let hard work make up for the 'very'.

3
Newbie Discussion / Re: Models Required for Success?
« on: February 01, 2010, 12:20 »
Thus far my assumption has been confirmed, but it's still early  :)

Agreed but I think that it should read 'Good' people shots as I have seen many portfolios full of average people shots that rarely sell.


fotographer, I certainly agree and my intent was not to suggest that one could fill their portfolio with people shots and succeed.  Whether submitting people, vectors, landscape, 3D, etc, the expectation is that they are of good quality and a subject that is useful in the world of stock imagery.

Thanks!

4
Newbie Discussion / Models Required for Success?
« on: February 01, 2010, 11:02 »
I am new to the microstock world and am doing everything I can to learn the business.  Forums, books, photo study, etc.  You could say that I'm a bit of a planner, which has hindered my start, but I expect it to help me in the long run.

Anyway, as I learn more about the industry, I'm starting to draw a conclusion that I wanted to run by you.  To be successful (I define successful as being able to make a living, say $3000/month for the purposes of this thread) a microstock photographer will most likely have to shoot models.  Granted, there's always 3D, vectors, etc, but sticking with photography (because I lack some of those other talents), it seems like there's only so much you can shoot before you run out of material that is of benefit to the industry.  However, people are always changing and therefore they will always sell.

Am I on to something here, or is this conclusion a stretch?  I know that there are always extraordinary circumstances, so let's assume that I'm just your average photographer in an average situation.

Thanks for the feedback!

5
This is such a great thread for a newb to read through (which I am).  I couldn't have found a better assortment of opinions on this topic.  What is interesting to me is that there is not a consensus.  What worked 5 years ago might not work today.  What works for Person A may not work for Person B (for many reasons).  Etc.

What readers can learn is that there are advantages and disadvantages to each approach.  They can then use this knowledge to pick what will work best for them.  That's why this thread is so good.  It's all right there for you.  Take the information and make an informed decision that will work for you.

Thanks to all of those that contributed!

6
Newbie Discussion / Re: Introduction - New to Microstock
« on: January 26, 2010, 12:00 »
Hey Brandy, welcome aboard (from 1 newb to another)!  I checked out your Blog and thoroughly enjoyed it...some great photos!  Keep up the good work and thanks for sharing your experience through blogging!!

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors