pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Bruce Weber

Pages: [1]
1
General Stock Discussion / Re: new entrant: stockafe
« on: December 19, 2015, 15:53 »
Thanks everyone for your comments!

2
General Stock Discussion / Re: new entrant: stockafe
« on: December 17, 2015, 21:56 »
I know this is an old post, but I'd like to resurrect it if I may. Full disclosure - I am a contributor to Stockafe and an unpaid "evangelist". I am not one of the principles of the company. But I have the ear of the founders.

To answer some questions, yes we are in the Seattle area. There are a couple of things we're doing that we hope will set us apart from SS and the rest. First, our stated goal is to make a positive difference in the stock industry, not only for contributors and buyers, but for those who are served by stock imagery. Recently there's been a lot of attention on the unspoken messages embedded in the images that the media uses to represent people, especially women and girls, people of color, people with disabilities, and the LGBTQ community. We believe photographers can lead the change and make a difference. Some of the existing image issues we hope to address are the following:

  • Unrealistic body images, both men and women
  • Distorted representation of what women/men do and are
  • Unrealistic and/or under representation of people of color and LGBT youth/adults
  • Images that support misogyny and stereotypes

You can also read the http://inspire.stockafe.com/stockafe/stockafe-manifesto/

BTW, we are in the process of updating the look and feel of the site. :)

To date, most of our efforts in recruiting contributors and finding buyers have been local. Unfortunately, we seem to be in a chicken and egg scenario. It's hard to find contributors with quality images without having a steady stream of sales. And it's hard to attract buyers without having a robust catalog of quality images.

Question for you - If we offered 60% or 70% plus royalties to contributors on a limited number of files (100-500) for a year or two, would that be enough to get you to "bother"?

3
Shutterstock.com / Shutterstock's logo
« on: January 18, 2015, 03:20 »
Does SS provide logo images to use on your website so that you can link to your portfolio on their site? I have looked everywhere I can think of, but no luck.

4
Dreamstime.com / Re: DT Review time
« on: January 12, 2015, 16:24 »
Thanks! I sent feedback on 5 images (the limit) and linked to that thread. We'll see what happens.

5
Dreamstime.com / Re: DT Review time
« on: January 12, 2015, 12:30 »
Arrrg. They are finally starting to review my images, but they are getting rejected for not using a paper model release. My fault for not reading the submission guidelines close enough, but really? No Easy Release for DT?

6
Dreamstime.com / Re: DT Review time
« on: January 06, 2015, 18:46 »
Thanks for reassuring me. I'll keep waiting.

7
Dreamstime.com / DT Review time
« on: January 06, 2015, 17:20 »
I uploaded my first batch of photos to DT 11 days ago. The estimate to review hasn't changed much and still shows 116 hours. Is this common? I know we've had the holidays, but this seems excessive.

8
Sorry, not quite that new. :) So the 25 a day downloads I've had on SS are subs? Just trying to learn the lingo.

9
Newby question: What are subs?

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors