Trump followers an supporters are more insane than The Donald.

Never fear doing the right thing. The individual is a thief pure and simple.

c



quote author=Minscer link=topic=26518.msg441224#msg441224 date=1452322393]
I'm changing my username to avoid any possible future retaliation. If you must know, my last topic was 'holiday slump'.

I want to get my first camera now so i need you help.
What would be better for microstock use and general use?
And what will work better with 50mm lens?

Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk

Nikon. And the Nikkor 50 mm 1.4 is perfect combination.

Now we are getting somewhere. At least you received an answer. Ill go do the same. What is screwy is their catch-all replies are nonsense in so many cases. 

Quote from: PaulieWalnuts on September 18, 2015, 11:25

On my website where I now only license images as RM I got a $450 sale a couple days ago. And 100% of $450.

I understand the idea of making it easier for buyers to buy. To make more sales. But is the end result really more money in the pocket of contributors?

Paulie, Would love to see your site. I'm busy reserving URL names, planning etc. Thanks.

Ditto. TIA

C

Quote from: anathaya on September 08, 2015, 04:59

Quote from: Dumc on September 08, 2015, 02:48

I've done that. Re-processed image in PS that looked much better then the first time.

Do they accept two differently processed versions of same image?

Yes, that can happen.  When resubmitting an improved version, make sure that the new one gets approved before deleting the old one.  In that case you will have two versions of the same one until you delete the old one.

A few years ago I noticed that I had submitted some with a wrong color profile.  I prepared a bunch of improved ones and resubmitted them with a note that they were the same as previously accepted images just with an improved color profile.  I was surprised when some of them were rejected for focus, lighting or other reasons, even though they were fine and sold OK even though the color was slightly off.  I had assumed that improved versions of previously accepted images also would be accepted, but that was naive.  I was glad I had not deleted the original ones first.  After that I decided resubmitting improved versions was too much trouble and not worth the effort.

Yesterday, I had a rejected image for the reason of data, keywords, or keywords that did not fit the image. So, I was upset enough to go ahead and delete from the FT site before resubmitting. Now, when resubmitting, I have to rebuild the keywords. Not too big of an issue. BTW, they are all relevant and accurate. I should have waited to delete in order to save a few steps.

Its a lesson I won't forget.

Hi All,
This one is my image on pond5 & client purchased last night. They want me to give them the source file without any additional cost. Can you suggest what we should do?

Image: http://www.pond5.com/photo/51707567/social-media-networks.html

Regards!
Tan

Your answer should be no. Simply no. How did the client get to you in the first place?

wow.  i just realized that was my 10,000th post 

Man, how do you make time to post 2800+ per day. Amazing.

I would think at 450 years old a property release is mandatory. It is art, therefore, intellectual property. What's the big deal? Get a release to protect yourself. After all, that is the ONLY reason for obtaining a release. Don't tell me the release applies to other entities. The others are riding on your coat tails. You should get into the frame of mind that the model release protects YOU. The others count only if you make the decision to include them to.

best,

CEC

Nothing wrong with Nikon service. Expectations enter the equation. Just be a little patient. Stick with the Nikon due to the fact you already have experience with it. D810 is the superior product. I have owned one since they came out. Stick with Nikkor glass or upgrade to Zeiss. The 50 mm Planar is a perfect combination for go to everyday shooting.
All the best,
cec