pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - SuperPhoto

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 46
1
Not a bad start to the week. A little slow on the weekly ranking however. I'll have to work on that.

Huh. I have a lot of videos but for some reason, little to no sales yet the last couple days. Very odd/strange.

2
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe has blocked my account
« on: June 28, 2025, 07:51 »
Quote
Re-reading this... "50k" AI images... Even though I know what I'm doing, that... is a fair amount, to do accurately. (Did you do 'ai footage' as well, or was it just the images?)

What kind of quality control did you do, or did you just churn out as much as you could as fast as possible? Assuming you (probably like many with that volume) didn't have good quality control - so you either have an excessive number of IP issues (i.e. "statue of liberty"), or - significant keywording issues (i.e. you have say a picture of an orange with totally unrelated keywords like "race car, building", etc, etc...

That, I suspect is probably what triggered it...


In response to your question yes, in addition to approximately 50,000 AI-generated images, my portfolio also included around 1,500 AI-generated videos. It was a significant and meticulous effort both in terms of generation and proper attribution. Of course, I understand that not everything can be perfect, but based on my own assessment, about 95% of all uploaded AI assets were correctly and conscientiously prepared.

As for similars yes, they may have occurred. When working with such a high volume of content, its challenging to create something entirely unique every single time. Still, I did my best to maintain variety. After all, thats what the moderation team is for to filter out excess and approve only what meets the standards. Adobe and contributors like myself are in this together we both care about quality and consistent revenue. I fully understand that moderation takes resources, but it should be a two-way process. And if there are any issues, we contributors are ready to adjust, improve, and grow.

Regarding IP concerns given the scale of my portfolio, the risk should be minimal. If there were any violations, they were likely rare and unintentional. I always did my best to avoid problematic or risky content.

Additionally, I dont understand why if the issue is suspected to be with AI content the entire account was deactivated. Why not just temporarily disable the AI-generated assets pending review, instead of removing access to an entire portfolio of 50,000+ video footages that were created with years of effort and dedication? That kind of action feels extremely disproportionate, especially for someone who has been contributing for over 10 years.

What concerns me the most, however, is the complete lack of communication. It feels like a sign of disrespect toward the contributors the very people who generate the content that powers this platform. Were in the same boat. When problems arise, the logical path is to discuss them, find solutions, and improve the system not to simply deactivate accounts without explanation or ignore official support requests submitted through the proper channels (which were even assigned case numbers). Waiting over three months for a response is simply not acceptable.

Is there anyone from the Adobe team actually reading this forum?

Well, in this case... I suspect that might be it then. 5% is just waaay too high. While yes, I totally agree deactivating the entire port is very harsh (and I think there should be better communication) - from their side, they don't know if 5%, 15% 25%, etc of your assets are misleading/inaccurate/wrong/etc, etc... And if they notice a certain pattern if you skipping certain quality control aspects, I can understand it. Better to deactivate things now and figure things out later - than spend months with a contributor "getting around" to trying to fix their portfolio, etc.

Even though I would love to outsource certain aspects of the "AI" generation process (because it is VERY timeconsuming, boring, and just in general not a 'fun' aspect of the image/video creation process), or - skip certain aspects of it, when preparing "ai" assets, I

a) I personally review EVERY single "generated" title, "generated" keywords, etc when/if using "ai" generated meta data, in detail
b) I personally review EVERY single asset, whether an image or video (including watching the ENTIRE generated videos, no matter how many I have)

BECAUSE I personally do that - for EVERY single asset, what I have found is...

a) Even midjourney (for images), or various video generation services - they do generate nude images/videos.
b) They will generate "IP" protected assets (i.e., statue of liberty, some famous painting, an identical/recognizable actor/actress/etc/etc).
c) The keyword generation tools generate gibberish, significant irrevelant or inaccurate data, or "keyword stuff"
d) The "keyword generation" tools will "skip" things/assign them incorrectly. (I.e., say you have a picture of a basketball, then a car. It will "mix up" results and assign the "car" keywords to the basketball, and the "basketball" keywords to the "car").
e) They "do" include "signatures" in the images/videos. (Because the "ai" is based off of MASSIVE theft, when they "train" the "ai" - they basiclaly steal, and then resell stolen assets).

So - if you were churning out as much as you could - without personally reviewing IN DETAIL, EVERY single asset... you most likely inadvertently have stuff like "Disney's Snow white & the Seven Dwarves" types of assets (both using trademarked terms in the title, the keywords, etc - as well as having actual generated assets like that), or any of the issues I mentioned above.

You know what you did wrong. You took shortcuts, you were hoping to get away with... But - you got caught, and now you are upset.

While I don't personally agree with deactivating an "entire" port for contributors that DO review EVERY single asset to make sure it follows 'their rules' in 'their playground', and I do believe there should be better communication... For contributors that take shortcuts and have a blatant/obvious and excessive pattern of various infringements, I can totally understand it. Obviously you've exceeded some internal threshold of what they deem to be "taking shortcuts" - and that is what most likely tripped it.

BECAUSE you "don't" know if it is "95%", "85%", "75%", etc - that is the issue right there. Obviously you didn't personally review every asset, and you took shortcuts to speed things up. (And if you are only guessing that "95%" was good, then 5% of 50,000 - means that you have 2500 image assets that are 'risque', inaccurate, IP violations, etc - and 5% of 1500 means that 75 videos that are risque, inaccurate, IP violations, etc.

Those are pretty high 'violation' numbers.

While yes, the moderation team is there to make sure assets meet certain standards (in itself a different topic, because sometimes I think certain members only feel like approving a certain %, so randomly approve/don't approve certain assets)... it's not really their job to make sure you didn't simply spam the crap out of things and skip certain QC elements. (Especially when you are not the only one playing the spam-all-you can game, and there are literally hundreds of thousands of east indian and arabic spammers trying to spam the crap out of things - so they don't really have time to figure out in detail 'who' is 'following their rules', and who isn't - so it's just much easier to deactivate ports that have consistent, blatant infringements. And again, "5%" of 50,000 is a VERY high number.

While of course extremely upsetting (I totally understand that) - while you are waiting - I would start going through your assets and looking for things like that, maybe start fixing things. Chances are you'll find its a pretty high number.

3
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe - What are you doing?
« on: June 25, 2025, 19:22 »
no i dont participate .... the difference between the first months of the year is that since april/may im selling many videos with good prices ... for example this month: 3   for $36.93 - 2 for $31.19 - 2 for     $34.76 - 2   for $38.90 - 4 downloads for $53.12 .... and so on ...

Where does one make sure they are "not" signed up for that? I haven't really had any significant video sales on shutterstock in a long time, although I do have a good portfolio. They seem to only pay $0.25 per video...

4
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe has blocked my account
« on: June 21, 2025, 07:24 »
Thank you all for your replies and insights.

@stoker2014 - Thank you for providing the link to the official Adobe representative profile. I checked it out: unfortunately, they don't seem to accept direct messages, and all the links in their profile lead back to the same 'Contact Us' form on the official website, which, in my experience, has not yielded any results. Nevertheless, I appreciate you pointing them out.

@Rage - I'm truly sorry to hear you're in the same situation. It's incredibly frustrating.


What do you think the reason might be why you had account issues? I suppose you probably have a feeling/idea of what happened?

@SuperPhoto - To answer your question about the possible reason: the deactivation notice mentioned a violation of Generative AI guidelines. Shortly before that, I had simultaneously uploaded a large batch of AI images for review that had accumulated over several months of work. It's possible the system flagged this as spam, which led to the deactivation. I am more than willing to address and rectify any issues, but it's impossible without any feedback. An interesting fact is that even after the deactivation, I continued to receive emails for about a month with notifications of accepted or rejected work, which adds to the confusion.

Another question I would like to ask for @Adobe Stock Contributor Relations: By assigning case numbers to my inquiries, Adobe officially acknowledges receiving them. In most business practices and legal frameworks, a company has a duty to respond to official user inquiries, especially regarding serious matters like account deactivation. A complete silence for over three months seems to fall short of this obligation. This feels less like a delay and more like a deliberate decision to ignore, which I believe is not a normal practice, especially towards a 10-year partner.

I've seen in this forum thread that people previously had success reaching out to Mat Hayward, but he seems to be inactive now. I also emailed him, but there was no response. Are there any other contacts or staff members one can reach out to for help? Or is the only option really to just sit and wait for months?

Any advice or shared experience would be very valuable.

Re-reading this... "50k" AI images... Even though I know what I'm doing, that... is a fair amount, to do accurately. (Did you do 'ai footage' as well, or was it just the images?)

What kind of quality control did you do, or did you just churn out as much as you could as fast as possible? Assuming you (probably like many with that volume) didn't have good quality control - so you either have an excessive number of IP issues (i.e. "statue of liberty"), or - significant keywording issues (i.e. you have say a picture of an orange with totally unrelated keywords like "race car, building", etc, etc...

That, I suspect is probably what triggered it...

5
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe has blocked my account
« on: June 19, 2025, 22:09 »
I just received a similar mail yesterday night and my account has been deactivated. I have some 3k assets, photos videos only, no AI work.

Has anyone been able to suceed with the account re-activation in the past? What is the process you followed?

Is the work your own & original? Have you tried to game the system at all?

6
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe has blocked my account
« on: June 19, 2025, 20:11 »
What do you think the reason might be why you had account issues? I suppose you probably have a feeling/idea of what happened?

7
things have picked up, 2 video sales yesterday and a few image sales...let's hope for the best! :)

huh. sadly my sales dropped liek a stone the last 2 days :(

8
I am already using an old photoshop elements version to process camera images for istock and others.
??? ::) :'( :'( :'( :'(
 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

You can also disconnect from the internet and put on a tinfoil hat!

Might be wise for most people.

9
General Stock Discussion / Re: Welcome Back!
« on: June 13, 2025, 19:28 »
Any idea why the adobe sales are so low right now? And how to get them back up? Thanks!

10
It will be interesting, and curious why the theatrics, since basically both midjourney & disney, etc are funded/owned by the same main company/"investors" (i.e., the likes of blackrock/vanguard/state street/etc).

ALL "ai" (including chatGPT) is based off of massive massive theft. They are theft based services.

Seems like it more designed to make it harder for the 'little guy' to compete in the "ai" world, and fearful of potentially 'infringing' on someone's rights.
The big companies really don't care - because they are part of the same club.

11
General Stock Discussion / Re: Welcome Back!
« on: June 13, 2025, 06:03 »
@Pacesetter... Sales... are... not quite what I was expecting. Was expecting them to go up significantly with all the work I've done. Perhaps it will still come. How about yourself?

@Stoker2014... Re: Ukraine, lol - obviously assuming you are ukranian (forget if we chatted about this), so I suppose it's only naturally to love to bask in the glory of the mass media (fox, cnn, bloomberg, etc, etc) constantly saying "ukranians are awesome, give money to ukraine" and lap it up. But you have to remember - a lot of Russians are awesome too. As are a lot of Germans. It's the political figureheads (I wouldn't call them "leaders", because most don't "lead", but rather misdirect, pursue self interesting, lie cheat & steal for personal gain, etc - very controllable in fact and for the most part puppets by puppeteers behind the scenes)... But its the political figureheads that cause a lot of angst.

Sure you can write about "the war" - but... because the media & political figureheads lie so much and try and cause problems between races & people in general... why not focus on specifically what you observe? I.e., are you 'personally' writing from a laptop with planes & tanks crushing buildings? Or is that simply what "you heard" on "the news"? Do you personally see "russians" invading, or is it ukranians being paid a lot of money to wear russian uniforms and turning on their own people - becuase of "money" - by puppeteers behind the scenese (as actually happens in not only the ukraine, but a lot of different countries as well to try and cause dissent and strife)?

Now - it's not 'just' you - I do agree that unfortunately there do see a couple people here that seem to be massively brainwashed and if one says ANYTHING against what their television has told them they can talk about, they figuratively (and probably literally) have convulsions and froth at the mouth... kind of zombie like actually...

But anyways. I personally am interested in hearing things you 'personally' witness, and insights you may have into that.

12
Shutterstock.com / Re: The Months Earnings & Payments
« on: June 07, 2025, 08:33 »
the way SS pays changed about 6 months ago if I remember correctly,however it was communicated via email.

in short,now once you reach the minimum monthly payment of $25 the balance is reset on the 3rd of the month,no longer on the 1st.

"your earnings calculated" email now arrives a few hours before receiving the payment,before it arrived a few days before,at least 24/48 hours before,now instead the email arrives a couple of hours before more or less.

the times have been a bit longer,in any case the payment always arrives before the 15th of the month.

then for me nothing has changed,total monthly earnings always appears at the top right near the "upload" button.

Thing is, I never received an e-mail, nor a payment.

Yet, the amount has been deducted... Have you already gotten a payment?

13
Shutterstock.com / Re: The Months Earnings & Payments
« on: June 06, 2025, 22:14 »
Funny you'd mention that. I noticed the same thing today. Haven't gotten any e-mail yet, but it seems to have been 'deducted' (the earnings).

14
General Stock Discussion / Re: Motionarray
« on: June 06, 2025, 08:12 »
How much do you get from 1 video download and from 1 image download ? Thousands of downloads that you report seem very positive.

Based on my numbers (& estimating a little bit, because I'd have to do some extra math assuming their calculations are right, and I don't feel like doing that right now) - I'd guess between $0.15 and $0.25

15
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Acceptance Rates
« on: June 05, 2025, 09:54 »
For me, it just seems to be a generic 'quality issues'. I far as I can tell, it is good quality (I do pre-edit, inspect, etc) - so I suspect it is just a 'quota' thing.

16
General Stock Discussion / Re: This month's sales
« on: June 03, 2025, 17:27 »
Finally a better month following three consecutive poor months with $1300 on the microstocks and bit over $500 on YouTube for $1800 USD total for May 2025.

You made $500 on youtube, in adsense in a month? How many clips? That would be like... 71k views only?

17
Off Topic / Re: Canadian Wildfires
« on: May 31, 2025, 13:24 »
Why is it that conspiracy theorists always have this annoying habit of latching onto every new disaster or event like they know everything about it...?

Big difference between a conspiracy "theory" and an actual conspiracy.

Thinking would be wise. Automatically calling something a 'conspiracy theory' as ones only 'argument' is the lazy man's way of avoiding doing that.

A "theory" would be like me saying... You were cloned at birth, a basic install disk was inserted into you to parrot "conspiracy theory" whenever you came across something you didn't care to investigate or understand, but wanted the feeling of being smart without actually being smart. That - would simply be a "theory" - because I really don't have any actual evidence of you being like that, except observations. Simply a theory.

Discovering an actual conspiracy, and not just a 'theory' on the other hand - would be, say - upon reading financial reports and filings of corporations - seeing the connections/connecting the dots between... say several corporations conspiring to lowball residents for some land... the residents don't sell... so then "mysteriously" a wildfire erupts... the residents are "forced" to move out because their houses are burned to a crisp... and then the same corporations that lowballed the land, now conveniently happen to be there to get it for pennies on the dollar... and then afterwards - AMAZINGLY - there are no more wildfires in that specific area. Seeing those connections, and realizing that happens, would not be a theory, but an actual conspiracy.

18
Off Topic / Re: Canadian Wildfires
« on: May 31, 2025, 13:22 »
A lot of the so-called "wildfires" are actually paid arsonists (some govt, others hired via things like craigslist) trying to promote the 'climate change' narrative, among other things. Also to try and "move" certain populations into the city (because people are being 'coralled' like cattle into cities - easier to "manage").

This is such an immense stupidity;  it is quite hard to believe someone would have such a low IQ to actually believe this.  Please go away

You know, it's getting irritating with your inane name calling zeljkok. I'm sorry to hear that your life is that depressing and sad that name calling is the only way you can have a discussion, because your mind is that far gone that nothing else is in there.

Sadly, people like you - make it possible for evil people to do evil. You fit the profile of someone who suffocated themselves daily for two years - didn't see the irony that... if you let someone shove a six inch stick up your nose - to "see if you were sick" - then yes, you were definitely sick - and didn't need a 'test' to tell you that. You didn't see the irony - of sticking a needle in your arm with a poisonous substance, was actually injecting poison into you, and not 'curing' you of anything, but actually causing the "disease" that you believed you were trying to avoid.

But, I'm sad for you - obviously you weren't strong enough to withstand being abused. A lot of people weren't - to my surprise. I hope you heal. Good luck.

19
Off Topic / Re: Canadian Wildfires
« on: May 31, 2025, 08:53 »
A lot of the so-called "wildfires" are actually paid arsonists (some govt, others hired via things like craigslist) trying to promote the 'climate change' narrative, among other things. Also to try and "move" certain populations into the city (because people are being 'coralled' like cattle into cities - easier to "manage").

20

I'm kind of sad right now. My weekly earnings should be higher (actually much higher than yours right now) - but... sadly the last few months have been very low. Quite concerning, don't know why. But good job. Now I need to figure out how to get my earnings not only back where they should be, but improving significantly.

Thanks, since I started to create and upload almost only videos, my earnings have increased. For the images I take a couple of frames of my videos and upload them as is.

Yes, it's odd. I do videos as well in addition to images but my sales have gone down, which makes no sense. How many videos to you have?

I have about 2100 videos (motion graphics) and 6000 images.

My sales are gone down from 15/20 videos every month to almost 0 on Pond5, from may 2024, I don't know why, seems that my portfolio is hidden somewhere...

Yes, my Pond5 sales about 2 years ago dropped by about 90%. Then with the new "good news" from them about stealing another 25%, dropped (in addition to their "good news") about another 50%.

For adobe, its concerning - this last week has been about 1/5th of what my sales normally would be. Quite concerning.

21

I'm kind of sad right now. My weekly earnings should be higher (actually much higher than yours right now) - but... sadly the last few months have been very low. Quite concerning, don't know why. But good job. Now I need to figure out how to get my earnings not only back where they should be, but improving significantly.

Thanks, since I started to create and upload almost only videos, my earnings have increased. For the images I take a couple of frames of my videos and upload them as is.

Yes, it's odd. I do videos as well in addition to images but my sales have gone down, which makes no sense. How many videos to you have?

22
Decent mid-week
I dont care about position, my focus is on earnings, maybe Im wrong, but it works for me :)

I'm kind of sad right now. My weekly earnings should be higher (actually much higher than yours right now) - but... sadly the last few months have been very low. Quite concerning, don't know why. But good job. Now I need to figure out how to get my earnings not only back where they should be, but improving significantly.

23
Quote
yes but stop pointing the finger at any specific culture,spam is done in any part of the world,as you said too.

Why? You seem to be missing the point. If 95% of your problems are caused by a specific region/culture/etc, why wouldn't you do something about it?
It's like saying 'omfg! bank robbers are people too! Don't call them bank robbers! Call them financially challenged!'

While yes - other people do it as WELL... The MAJORITY is caused by east indian/pakinstani/arabic spammers/scammers.
That's why you have 'nigerian phone scams', and you say dont hear of... 'ukranian phone scams'... Or why people get phone calls from east indians posing as collection agencies/'tax authorities'/credit card companies/etc... and its not usually say... associated with people from barbados... because in general, people from those cultures do those things. there is a reason its called 'culture' - because its a set of habits people associated with it tend to do.

Like if I say "Samurai Warrior" you probably don't think of a black midget samurai, you probably think of a Japanese samurai warrior...
Or if I say "NBA basketball player" (lol while not technically a culture, more of a stereotype) - you probably don't think of 'omfg, those awesome east indian basketball players', but rather black (or sometimes white) basketball players...

Anyways. Yes.

The "ai" makes it SUPER easy for people with absolutely (or virtually) no creative/artistic skills, but with amazing stealing/theft/spam skills, to "compete" with people who do have skills.

24
I have noticed that many accounts on shutterstock with stolen content from apps like Kinemaster....
And based on the portfolio names and account creation date, and same content in all account...Most of these accounts created by one person/same family members...

The worst part is that Shutterstock promoting these portfolios by keeping their content in first pages when you search "Green Screen".

Here is the list of portfolios...

https://www.shutterstock.com/g/Laju+King/video
https://www.shutterstock.com/g/Muhammad-Yousaf/video

...


It's also possible that it actually is 'different' guys - because sometimes one guy will brag about how much $$$ he is getting, and then 'share' a complete set of links and others do the same. (Sometimes on youtube, sometimes on facebook, sometimes other areas).

You could be right that it is just one guy - but it could also possibly be multiple individuals spamming stolen accounts.

And for cobalt/F8/zeljok that like to get morally outraged - look @ the names of the accounts. What nationality does it look like? Hmm. Thinking cap time.

As for WHY shutterstock doesn't do anything... My guess is because they don't care - and they get more $$$.
They only care if it affects their $$$.

25
it's always better now with submission limits.

a few days ago i was reading about someone who uploads 100 contents a day,sometimes getting rejections of 90% but other times rejections of 50% or less,so in the end he gets approvals for more than a thousand contents per month,which in my opinion is too much.

it's too much because sending 100 contents a day means that these contents are poorly made,from every point of view,even from the indexing point of view,because there simply isn't enough time to create and send 100 contents a day.

Even if you use an AI for indexing,the results should be checked,because there are many errors in the generated results,and so,whoever uploads 100 contents a day only creates a big mess in the library and sends contents without actually creating anything,imo.

these limits are necessary,so I'm happy that they have finally been implemented.

Unfortunately - submission limits don't really 'hurt' anyone except for 'honest' people...

The east indian/arabic spammers/scammers find different ways - and in fact - I think it was actually ON this forum (or maybe it was in discord) that one east indian BRAGGED about how he was simply getting CHILDREN to give them his "id" (he paid them I think $5) - so he could create MULTIPLE accounts (at that time I think he bragged about having 10 accounts) - and submit that way.

Look @ country of registration. Pakistani/East Indian? Reject - or put severe limits on the account until it has been 'proven'.
Do the same thing CREDIT card companies do. They don't blindly accept ANY transaction for fear of being accused of being "racist". They care about $$$.
And they KNOW its a poor risk to accept certain transactions from certain countries, and/or certain nationalities.

That being said - sadly now a lot have been 'imported' into Canada & the US to run the same types of spam/scam operations... so not 'as' easy - but still doable.

SUPER easy way of stopping the spam/scamming - and yes, it is primarily east indians/pakistanis + several of the arab nations. Of course OTHER people do it too - but in general significantly much less than these particular cultures seeking 'get rich quick' schemes...

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 46

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors