MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Yakystockero

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock Search Webinar
« on: March 24, 2024, 19:21 »
What is the point of having to choose categories, if the search is done by keywords? Better to keep things simple, fewer requests to the server equals faster response.

2
Dreamstime.com / Re: $100 payout minimum sucks!!!
« on: March 08, 2024, 13:59 »

Even automated online payments are not free. You need software, a payment service provider or payment gateway. This costs money and the prices usually depend on the invoice volume.

In this respect, Dreamstime's argument is understandable.

I prefer the high payout limit to lower sales revenue  ;)

Payment companies offer these transfers, services and free software to many sender, as they take a good cut in the currency exchange, with the loss of the recipient of course.

3
Dreamstime.com / Re: $100 payout minimum sucks!!!
« on: March 08, 2024, 04:52 »
Well, $100 made sense years ago when DT worked well and could be reached in a few weeks/months, but this situation has changed. While it is true that they are within their rights since it is known and agreed information, it would be good if they knew how to adapt to their new situation and lower that limit, especially given that payment is an automatic and cost-free process.

And if they are not able to automate, it is because they are outdated and out of the market, and therefore they will die little by little, ergo it would make no sense to continue uploading content there.

4
Adobe Stock / Re: what comes after "1 year ago"?
« on: March 05, 2024, 04:10 »
I also have 1 "sent 1 year ago", in a queue with 4k sent 1 month ago.

5
Is it worth uploading AI to vecteezy?

6
Adobe Stock / Re: What's your weekly ranking and how many images?
« on: February 26, 2024, 08:59 »
Lifetime: 4200
This week (Monday noon) :  25 dl  1850   

7
"Dreamstime makes it extremely easy to upload." 
  extremely?? 

For me it is one of the most tedious to upload, so much so that I hardly upload anything there anymore.  2023 stopped selling me almost nothing, and in 2024 nothing. Port of almost 30k images.

9
yeah, it's been much slower these last few weeks. I continue uploading as I usually do, they just accumulate. I see that images uploaded two days ago are approved, but those uploaded a week ago are still in the queue.

10
Shutterstock.com / Re: Is Shutterstock dead?
« on: February 19, 2024, 05:24 »
 :(

11
I upload to fineartamerica and pictorem those photos that I think might look good in a canvas  in someone's living room or a mug, but I only make less than $50 a year.

12
DepositPhotos / Re: no payment
« on: February 07, 2024, 04:17 »
Check your spam folder, I received the email instantly, like three days ago.

13
Canva / Re: Almost any images get rejected instantly?!
« on: December 04, 2023, 17:43 »
Yeah, same here, 3 approved out of 100 sent this past week.

14
General Stock Discussion / Re: Freepik acquiring EyeEm?
« on: October 12, 2023, 17:19 »
Received my pending $, and some sales have also come in, I suppose those that were made months ago:

Extended License
$ 53.26
EyeEm Market

15
"0.66$ per image/video/graphic/template per year."


  I have 15k photos, x 0.66$= 9.900$ / per year, so.... nope.   

16
Se ha(n) aadido $665.78 extra de fondo de contribuyente de Firefly al saldo disponible. Pago mnimo nico de 1 USD. Ms informacin 


An extra $665.78 of Firefly contributor fund has been added to the available balance. Minimum one-time payment of 1 USD. More information


17

The programmers have appropriated copyright work to make their product, and as proved in the paper I referenced that work is still accessible using the right prompts (though this is not all that relevant as the issue is the appropriation of the work for commercial purposes without the copyright owners consent).



Although legally there may be loose details that programmers have infringed upon, the point of AI image creation, as a concept, is exactly the same one that we have all learned to read, write, draw or photograph. I have read dozens of books by cartier bresson, Avedon, Erwit, Leibovitz... and seeing their photos is how I have learned to photograph, and I have created my own photographs with theirs in my mind.
That's the same thing they do, and it can't be avoided, because the photos are published, open to anyone's eye.

Years ago you had to pay to enter the museums, now it's not even necessary.


tell that to the musicians who got sued after listening to others work and using it it as "inspiration". 

fascinating how many stock photographer seem to have an international law degree.

I think there is a difference between inspiring and plagiarizing, in many cases separated by a fine line. That is why there are thousands of music plagiarism accusation cases that are resolved in favor of the plaintiff and many thousands more in favor of the defendant.

I'm just saying that things are not absolute black or white. And personally I have not seen any cases of plagiarism by AIs yet. It is like saying that the first photographer who took a photo of an apple on a white background has the right to accuse the next 30,000 photos of apples on a white background that are in the SS catalog.

18

The programmers have appropriated copyright work to make their product, and as proved in the paper I referenced that work is still accessible using the right prompts (though this is not all that relevant as the issue is the appropriation of the work for commercial purposes without the copyright owners consent).



Although legally there may be loose details that programmers have infringed upon, the point of AI image creation, as a concept, is exactly the same one that we have all learned to read, write, draw or photograph. I have read dozens of books by cartier bresson, Avedon, Erwit, Leibovitz... and seeing their photos is how I have learned to photograph, and I have created my own photographs with theirs in my mind.
That's the same thing they do, and it can't be avoided, because the photos are published, open to anyone's eye.

Years ago you had to pay to enter the museums, now it's not even necessary.

19
Adobe Stock / Re: Review time
« on: May 09, 2023, 03:01 »
yeah, 22 days here.  If more photos come in than come out, the queue will increase little by little, until the wave passes. You have to start uploading the content for Christmas right now!

20
General Stock Discussion / Re: 123RF is dead
« on: January 18, 2023, 01:51 »
Very stable over the last year, after a decline since 2021, the same pattern as Dreamstime and other small agencies.

21
General Stock Discussion / Re: How do you backup your data?
« on: August 06, 2022, 09:51 »
I am using backblaze for years: affiliate link:  https://secure.backblaze.com/r/01nw5k

22
Canva / Re: Has anyone received their Canva payment?
« on: July 18, 2022, 08:56 »
Yes , 4 hours ago in my paypal.

23
Yeah:

"Hey,

Thank you so much for your patience around our payouts to you, our community.

As you may be aware Talenthouse AG has undergone a significant corporate process involving merging companies, which means we arent able to get payments processed as quickly as wed hoped. Were disappointed that we were unable to pay you on time, and are working tirelessly to ensure payment is received smoothly from now on.

Rest assured you absolutely will be paid. Were preparing our next payment schedules so well aim to get you paid within the next few weeks.

Thank you again for your patience and for bearing with us as we organise internally. We couldnt do what we do without you."

24
Received the extra right now, 70 new pics selected.

25
A search algorithm takes into account tens, if not hundreds, factors with different weights. And today thanks to AI these factors change automatically without human intervention.
Image resolution may be a factor, it may weight 0.1% or 10%. It is almost impossible for us to do tests from the outside since you can only modify one factor with each upload, and even if you delete and upload your image dozens of times, your position will be affected by the rest of the photos that have been uploaded in the meantime.

Probably what most positions an image is the view / download ratio, that's why SS prohibits you from buying your own images. For every reason that you think it does, you will find someone else whose experience tells you just the opposite.

It is also possible that the algorithm is a monkey dancing on a touch screen with the new photos and thus assigning them points.

Pages: [1] 2 3

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors