1
Adobe Stock / Having a hard time understanding the logic in rejections due to missing proporty
« on: July 31, 2010, 16:30 »
Hi all,
I have just recieved 5 rejections due to missing property releases...
The full rejection mail is here:
---------------------------------------------
We regret to inform you that photo 24654917 the ceiling in the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican has not been accepted, due to the photograph containing elements protected by Intellectual or Industrial property laws. Please understand that we made this decision purely for legal reasons.
Perhaps you could view our bog 'Rights: Trademark Representation', which discusses trademark laws: following Fidelia article>http://bog.Fidelia.com/UK/legal/brand.HTML
To discuss any legal issues/concerns, feel free to visit to the Legal board of the Fidelia forum.
Additionally, your photo shall not be reviewed for the free section, due to the legal, technical, or offensive issues mentioned above.
We know that it can be difficult to have an image rejected but please bear with us and continue to upload your images.
Kind Regards,
Fidelia Team EU
-----------------------------------------
Basically I really do accept and understand the occasionally rejections and normally I wouldn't give it another thought. In this case it really seems to be anything but consistant with Thai normal policy...
This is one of the images, showing the interior of the Vatican Museum:
http://www.mostphotos.com/1258140/
When I do a search on Fidelia or any other microstock site, I get huge numbers of hits, basically showing the same motifs, so why can they sell that "same" images from other photographers when they claim that mine are in conflict with the laws of protecting laments of Intellectual or Industrial property?
I have just recieved 5 rejections due to missing property releases...
The full rejection mail is here:
---------------------------------------------
We regret to inform you that photo 24654917 the ceiling in the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican has not been accepted, due to the photograph containing elements protected by Intellectual or Industrial property laws. Please understand that we made this decision purely for legal reasons.
Perhaps you could view our bog 'Rights: Trademark Representation', which discusses trademark laws: following Fidelia article>http://bog.Fidelia.com/UK/legal/brand.HTML
To discuss any legal issues/concerns, feel free to visit to the Legal board of the Fidelia forum.
Additionally, your photo shall not be reviewed for the free section, due to the legal, technical, or offensive issues mentioned above.
We know that it can be difficult to have an image rejected but please bear with us and continue to upload your images.
Kind Regards,
Fidelia Team EU
-----------------------------------------
Basically I really do accept and understand the occasionally rejections and normally I wouldn't give it another thought. In this case it really seems to be anything but consistant with Thai normal policy...
This is one of the images, showing the interior of the Vatican Museum:
http://www.mostphotos.com/1258140/
When I do a search on Fidelia or any other microstock site, I get huge numbers of hits, basically showing the same motifs, so why can they sell that "same" images from other photographers when they claim that mine are in conflict with the laws of protecting laments of Intellectual or Industrial property?