Anyone having the same issue? It seems to only happen with editorial photos... Yesterday spent couple of hours to put dates in my captions and today all editorial photos rejected with "File Transfer Error -- Please check your file and resubmit."
Makes me want to cry 

Hi,

I always have many problems, when deciding whether I should put my photo to standard RF or Editorial collection. Some sites like 123RF make it easy and make that selection for me. But as the result of different approaches by different sites I have many images on one site as Standard RF, on the other as Editorial RF. Is it ok like that? I do not put any image as RF on one site, when it is RM on the other, this thing is clear. I take mostly travel photos(nature, architecture, etc.) and some of the buildings are protected by Intellectual Property Rights and sometimes happens I am not aware of it. For example I took a photo of Atomium in Belgium. Some sites rejected these images, some took them as Standard RF and some as Editorial. Recently I have found these two pages about image restrictions:
http://www.shutterstock.com/buzz/legal/stock-photo-restrictions
http://wiki.gettyimages.com/

Shutterstock says:

The Atomium
Located in Brussels, Belgium.
The building is a large model structure of an iron molecule.
Unacceptable for editorial or commercial use.

Istock/Getty says:

Located in Brussels and built for the 1958 Brussels World Fair (Expo 58) the Atomium monument is a representation of a unit of iron crystal.
Imagery of the Atomium should be avoided in Royalty-Free content.
The Atomium may, however, be featured in Editorial content.

If I base my knowledge on what Istock/Getty says it is ok having photos of Atomium as Editorial, but not as Standard RF and I have my Atomium photos distributed under both licensing. What does it mean for me as a photographer? Can I have any problems because of it? Some of the stock sites have in their agreements that photographer is the one responsible for his content and any legal issues that may it cause. On the other hand I have read some articles saying that the one that should be aware of these legal issues is the publisher, not the photographer. How it is in a reality? These days I have nightmares, because I have sold on Pixmac an extended RF license of my photo showing Atomium itself. 

Hi

I am from Poland. I have just finished my BSc and probably I will go soon to live in the UK for several months and also planning to enroll for a master course somewhere in the UK. I do microstock and pay taxes here in Poland(without being self-employed), but I would like to start my Symbiostock site so that I should registered a company/self-employment. I have read HMRC website and in my opinion registering as a sole trader in the UK could be a good idea(better than doing it in Poland). From what I have read there is no problem to do it as I am EU citizen, but I need to provide UK address. For sure I will rent a room. Let's say that I register as a sole trader on this address. What happens if I move to another flat? I like travel photography, after finishing my studies I would like to travel around the world. Can I stay being sole trader in the UK without having any address there? Does HMRC send anything to a physical address? To be clear, I would like to pay taxes online in the UK both on Symbiostock and microstock income and try it full-time. A part from that I will have to pay NI class 2 and will get a British pension if I live long enough , am I right? Still don't know what to do with an insurance... How is it with NHS? Is it all a good idea?

Karol