1
Adobe Stock / AI Generated Imagery, Is It OK To Sell It?
« on: May 06, 2023, 05:19 »
I am trying to understand the theoretical reasons why some agencies accept AI generated imagery and others dont. Meanwhile, Adobe is one of the few (and the largest platform) that does accept this type of content for sale. And then Getty (iStock), Shutterstock (Pond5), Alamy, and some others dont accept it. Or if they do accept it then it has to be imagery created with their own native AI generators that are controlled by that platform.
The basis for not accepting and licensing the content for sale for most of them is that AI image generating models/platforms scrape millions of copyrighted images from the internet in order to source ideas and, thus the content being used to generate the AI imagery is not free from rights.
So is the reason that sites like Adobe, Dreamstime, 123RF and others do accept AI generated content is that they see the AI platforms as only gaining creative inspiration and taking creative license from all the copyright content that is being scraped by the AI image generators and thus making it a non-violation of usage rights?
I am not sure what the right answer is here, but I guess theoretically these AI models using copyright content to generate their own images would be no different than a photographer looking at an existing copyrighted photo of an apple and then photographing their own apple in the same spirit with similar lighting and composition to the copyrighted image they saw.
An interesting debate.
The basis for not accepting and licensing the content for sale for most of them is that AI image generating models/platforms scrape millions of copyrighted images from the internet in order to source ideas and, thus the content being used to generate the AI imagery is not free from rights.
So is the reason that sites like Adobe, Dreamstime, 123RF and others do accept AI generated content is that they see the AI platforms as only gaining creative inspiration and taking creative license from all the copyright content that is being scraped by the AI image generators and thus making it a non-violation of usage rights?
I am not sure what the right answer is here, but I guess theoretically these AI models using copyright content to generate their own images would be no different than a photographer looking at an existing copyrighted photo of an apple and then photographing their own apple in the same spirit with similar lighting and composition to the copyrighted image they saw.
An interesting debate.