|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - digitalfood
Pages: [1]
1
« on: July 08, 2008, 08:44 »
Not only is it easier than IS but the pay is better, sold one image with a $70.00 commission....
2
« on: July 02, 2008, 21:17 »
Last time I uploaded there key wording came in through he meta data and is mush easier than IS.
3
« on: June 08, 2008, 10:44 »
This lack of FTP upload for images is the biggest reason IS is the last place we upload to.
4
« on: June 02, 2008, 06:47 »
Did you not notice that the commission on subs is below the .33 commission you get for an xs download....They need to offer an opt out of all as stockxpert does or they will lose their contributors.
5
« on: May 30, 2008, 12:22 »
Where the opt out all images like as Stockxpert.
6
« on: April 02, 2008, 13:53 »
The problem with iStock is the percentage period exclusive or not, 40% max. is insulting considering most other sites give a min. 33% and more at 50% and some %70%....
7
« on: March 08, 2008, 14:45 »
exactly, but if top non exclusive earners such as you, lisafx, would boycott new uploads then they may reconsider their position on non exclusive commissions and it may even benefit exclusive by having them finally give exclusive a 50/50 split regardless of level. Aside from their very restrictive exclusivity being all or nothing, not image exclusivity but artist, not even RM agencies require that. I feel if they reject an image then you should be free to upload it else where.
8
« on: March 08, 2008, 11:05 »
A union is a bit much but a boycott could work to get better commissions from those sites that only offer a very small 20% commission.
Personally I think it should be a 50/50 split or better as featurepics does.
If enough people stop uploading to those sites and post on their forums that a better commission is needed maybe we can make some changes.
iStock for one raises it's prices but not the commission percentage going to those who make it, the contributors and hide behind advertising cost, well I see plenty of Fotolia and stockxpert ads in the trades and they give us a better commission.
9
« on: March 03, 2008, 06:46 »
blind loyalty of iStock exclusive photographers disgusts me even more than Xsize prices.
AGREED
10
« on: January 28, 2008, 21:55 »
If you keyword in ITPC data it will all transfer in and it is just a matter of going through the panel much easier than most of the micro sites.
11
« on: January 26, 2008, 22:14 »
Exclusivity at iStock just does not make any sense, we triple our income by being on the othersites which give a much better commission than iStock. Featurepices for one can earn us as much as iStock with a 5th of the downloads as iStock. Lets face it until iStock is willing to give a min. 50% commission why bother.....
12
« on: January 19, 2008, 10:01 »
Just upload in Jan and got first sale, got to love the commission.
13
« on: January 13, 2008, 09:09 »
That isn't in their user agreement, as far as I could read. They are non-exclusive. I will upload some selected shots on PSC that are on micro too, and then see. If they sell, I can always disable them on micro. Eggs and baskets.... After all, they are just beginning.
It may not be in thier user agreement but if you upload them as RM there could be other issue plus ethically it is just wrong to sell an image as both.
14
« on: January 13, 2008, 09:03 »
If your profile is different from other as you sales seems to suggest, perhaps you should try some agencies with different approch as Alamy, Featurepics or Photoshelter ? At least give them a try. As you seem to have already a huge porfolio, select 100 pictures for each and load them. What is you risk ?
You cannot upload images from microsites to Alamy or PSC as they are traditional stock sites with mostly RM images.
15
« on: January 12, 2008, 09:28 »
featurepics, featurepics 70% commission need I say more.
16
« on: January 12, 2008, 09:19 »
We have upload over 100 images to PSC and it is much better than IS by leaps and bounds IS has one of the worst upload systems.
They have several different categories that cover different styles and you can have some shot there that would be rejected from all the micros, just remember you cannot upload images to PSC that you have on microsites, PSC is traditional stock pricing, we use them and Alamy for our RM stock.
They are to new to have sales figures up and have just started advertising the site. The stat system is nice as you can see all the stats for your images.
17
« on: January 10, 2008, 19:27 »
We more than double our IS income by being on other sites StockXpert Fotolia SS.
18
« on: January 10, 2008, 15:55 »
From IS"The Contract does not require exclusivity for:
Rights-Managed images with other organizations"
This all or nothing is one of the biggest problem with IS exclusivity. Some of our biggest earners on other sites are rejections from IS.
Also to say you can't RM images they rejected just seems wrong, next they are going to want rights to your first born.
19
« on: January 08, 2008, 10:36 »
Have always opted out and will not upload to SS any new.
List for downsize images when submitting to SS and opt out subscription at StockXpert:
Yuri Arcurs
Freezingpictures (558)
GeoPappas
Smithore (596)
rene
sharpshot (2756)
ldambies
epixx
latex
FlemishDreams.
RTimages
Vonkara
helix7
Travelling-light
Mjp (994)
northflyboy
ason
sorsillo (538)
boatman
Alex
Eco
Rozmaryna (68)
Pixelbrat
Read_My_Rights (277)
vphoto
faber (300)
dbvirago
cmcderm1
boryak
HughStoneIan
digiology
moori
pixart
fauxware
rosendo (313)
Lukasphoto
aremafoto (2147)
IKOphotos (1842)
Kiya
erwinova
Velvia
DanP68
Jorgeinthewater
digitalfood
20
« on: January 07, 2008, 14:59 »
istock now make $8.80 on those $2.20 sales for non-exclusives. I do feel it is time they gave us a better share.
In order for that to happen they would first need to increase the share for exclusives.
But 60% for exclusives (diamond) and 40% for non-exclusives would be very nice.
How about a 50/50 split for all exclusives and use the system they have now for non exclusives based on the canister level.
21
« on: January 07, 2008, 09:11 »
Yuri, you don't have to join those site to sell your images at marco, just look into Photoshelter Collect, Alamy as the to best site, Photoshelter give a 70% commission and you can sell RF or RM images. Your work is better than microstock especially if you are producing expensive shoots.
22
« on: January 06, 2008, 18:47 »
Have you looked into photoshelter, alamy or myloupe for RM?
23
« on: January 05, 2008, 11:12 »
I agree that there split is pitiful a minimum 30/70 would be better considering that even with the price increase we still make more per image on most other sites. We have chosen not to upload any new work until split increases and an FTP upload system is in place.
Pages: [1]
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
