MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - JuhaSa

Pages: [1]
1
Adobe Stock / Re: 2023 Adobe Stock contributor bonus plan details
« on: February 21, 2024, 09:37 »
Because no body answer on this, ask again :/

"When I want to renew the code I get this message :This code is from a country or region that does not match your Adobe ID.
Last year everything went well."

What we to do with this problem? On Adobe support I do not get any valid answer :(

Is Creative Cloud available in your country

https://www.adobe.com/special/products/creativecloud/pdfs/cc-availability-matrix.pdf

2
Adobe Stock / Re: 2023 Adobe Stock contributor bonus plan details
« on: February 20, 2024, 16:49 »
Through Adobe Virtual Assistant I was able to connect with a real person and I was able to cancel another Photography plan

3
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock generative AI reminders
« on: September 16, 2023, 04:10 »
If you use the filters "Vector" + "gernerative AI only", you get 120000 results. This is quite a lot considering that these files are not accepted.
I spoke to the support and they are probably going to fix it. Probably, by re-reviewing. Soon, I guess.

At this day, I think, real Vector-AI will be punished. Because Adobe is not accepting Vector AI. While I don't see any clear answer of a line in ToS about it.

Is there a way to question Mat directly? Because I really think it's time to start thinking of AI-vectors as a separate thing, like AI images. Look at Shutterstock, which claims zero tolerance for AI. Their database is full of it. And they will never know what is human-made now, they will never be able to roll it back.

Is this really the intention at all? So, if I remove a minuscule logo with the new 'remove' tool, do I have to label my photo as 'generated with AI'? This completely misses the point, doesn't it? 'Modified by AI' would cover it better, but I still find it completely nonsensical

If I understand Mat Hayward's comment correctly, you don't need to  label your image as generative AI if you just remove something with generative AI tools.

Examples when to label your image as generative AI:

-Generating new additions, such as a new person, animal, or object
-Adding new subjects might compromise the accuracy of an image
-Making significant adjustments or changes to a human subject in an image
-Recoloring the primary subject of an image

Examples when you wouldnt be obligated to label an image as generative AI:

-Extending background for any reason
-Removing IP or other forms of retouching
-Removing distracting objects or people
-Recoloring the background of an image

https://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/announcing-adobe-firefly-a-new-family-of-creative-generative-ai-models/100/

4
Adobe Stock / Re: Weird Rating
« on: July 18, 2023, 04:07 »
https://stock.adobe.com/ua/contributor/211410870/Fai  top 200 with 100 photos....

Just to understand, where do you find the "top 200"?
I can't see a so extended list

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors