|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Imagecom
1
« on: April 24, 2017, 01:47 »
I have hundreds of editorial waiting for inspection over 4 weeks by now, also I have received a somewhat rude letter that they are bust -when asked "is there any problem ?" Have no idea what is happening there 
2
« on: April 08, 2017, 13:27 »
Hi,
In the beginning the inspection time was about 24 hrs. or less, now editorial stuff waiting over 3- 4 weeks and no sign of inspection.
Sent a letter to admin and the answer was a prefabricated meaningless one.
Dose anybody have same or similar experience or only I'm the lucky one ?
Thanks for the help.
Cheers
Tom
3
« on: January 06, 2011, 01:53 »
It was some in 2009, only one in 2010. Hardly any in total.
4
« on: January 06, 2011, 01:49 »
Well done. Go for the next $10 K marker now.
5
« on: December 31, 2010, 00:52 »
Hi Everybody,
Sorry just venting out.
About 2 mounts ago all changed. I have newer been a "100 % acceptance rated guy" but did O.K. all the time with SS - until know (I mean 2 mount ago) I did reach 99.99 % rejection rate ! Big achievement overnight ( I bet no body managed to achieve that) ! I was down so in desperation I wrote to SS admin and ask why ?
They were fast and polite with the answer - to make it short the inspector agreed with the review - big slap on my face.
I use the same gear (5D II with all "L" series glass), and with the post production C.S. 4) spending more and more time to make the image better.
I do not know what I'm doing wrong ??
Well just keep trying. Like somebody said in this tread "There loss" and as well as mine since until 8 weeks ago SS and I did fine since 2007.
I wish i know what I'm doing wrong ?
Tks to listen to me.
Have a Fantastic New Year Everybody.
Imagecom
6
« on: December 21, 2010, 02:27 »
Hi,
Some time ago there was a tread about this when actually a lawyer (reader) vent into details explaining how much this "LAW" is misinterpreted.
I do not think that any agency picked up on it - or may be there Lawyer interpreted in a different way -do not know.
7
« on: December 18, 2010, 15:14 »
"I was very hopeful when they were bought out that would improve" and the rejection rate are way way too high.
8
« on: November 06, 2010, 03:43 »
24-105 L but sometime use longer.
9
« on: October 15, 2010, 13:57 »
Hi,
Yes it is nice and work fast looks simple so you got all the right tools.
10
« on: October 02, 2010, 18:54 »
Hi,
"Anybody used dreamstime keywording for 50cents ?"
I newer figured out it is just once or each time $.50 ?
11
« on: September 24, 2010, 05:01 »
Wow well done Congratulation  !!!
12
« on: September 22, 2010, 02:57 »
I got to second that. Yes Bruce was (is) a nice, fair guy all the way back from Istockpro time.
13
« on: August 20, 2010, 03:10 »
It may be too late but for B - the assistance eye made the difference for me.
14
« on: August 14, 2010, 22:10 »
Well - it was an eye opener.
15
« on: July 22, 2010, 04:15 »
Good for You and Congratulations. 
16
« on: July 04, 2010, 05:32 »
Well i had 22 images there waiting for keywording quite a few mounts now.
So i did it yesterday - very fast evaluation (1 day)....... 21 failed out of 22.
:-\Well ....no admin change yet.
17
« on: June 19, 2010, 14:12 »
Here is what Peter wroth
"Thank you for writing.It might take a long time to get approved. We have just started the site and we would like to do some advertising first. We will start letting in new contributors when we start receiving some traffic. Thank you very much for your patience!
Best regards,Peter Hamza"
I think he said something similar in his earlier open latter to all of those who would be interested to contribute for StcoFresh.
Yes I love to be there too but i give a breathing space for the guys and wait - not because i could do anything else.
Regards
18
« on: June 19, 2010, 06:54 »
I have sent StockFresh an email.
- and Peter explained why is the delay.
19
« on: May 06, 2010, 03:03 »
My soon us to help me (not any more) but than was great help. I have offered him all the profit above a certain level.
20
« on: March 17, 2010, 04:03 »
Hi 2 subs (out of about 120 images)
21
« on: August 10, 2009, 04:10 »
I bough one years ago as a second hand I like it. It may not the best but for starter was O.K.
22
« on: August 10, 2009, 04:03 »
Hi
I do not wan to start any rumors just asking
Has anybody have any knowledge about a new Canon 5D mark 3 ?
23
« on: February 26, 2009, 02:47 »
It was funny -i was just laughing and laughing,
by the way I'm also a Canon guy
24
« on: February 25, 2009, 02:25 »
Hi ,
Tks for the honest input whatalife.
"To clarify, since you are quoting me, I do not "shop around". I am aware of the prices at DT vs. iStock. (Neither of which is 33 or 25 cents, or anywhere near that, by the way). I don't go scouring a bunch of sites to try to save a few pennies. When I go from istock to ONE other site, it is because I can get the same large image from the same photographer for as low as $4 at DT that would be $18 (12 credits) at IS, or the same medium image for as low as $3 that will be $9 at IS. Once I've decided to purchase an image, I am going to purchase it. If I can spend an extra 5 or 10 minutes to pay a fraction of the cost, then I will. Sure, the photographer is making a lot less, but I figure they made the choice to sell it elsewhere for a fraction of the cost, so I'd be foolish not to save money where I can."
25
« on: February 20, 2009, 20:57 »
Hi
The same thing happened to me too.
All I can say exemplary business conduct
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
