Did 123RF get new reviewers or are they trying to get tougher than iS and SS?
They definetly decided to improve the quality by increasing the requirements. Which is good. What I do not understand though, are the unclear rejections for "composition" and "lighting" reasons; stuff which went through IS, SS and DT get rejected sometimes.. Well, I say, let's get over it and upload more. Maybe the reviewer just "didn't like it".
I think there should be a new category for such rejections - "sorry, I just simply don't like it". At least it would be fair. After all, they have full right to disagree on accepting my photos, same as I have the full right to upload some others, or to some other agency.
Well, maybe I'm too easy on them, but I do believe in their good will and I do think that sometimes they just know better.
PS. While mass rejections at 123rf never happened to me, it's quite common at Crestock. They usually take 1 or 2 out of a batch of 50. I figure I just don't fit their profile, so I'm going to stop