pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bgbs

Pages: [1]
1
iStockPhoto.com / Did iStock delete my account
« on: May 03, 2017, 17:38 »
I logged in to my istock account today, my contributor account is gone. When I click on "Sell Stock" it gets me to a sign up page.  Any idea what happened there?  Did iStock purge all contributors who stopped contributing 2 years ago or something?

2
General Stock Discussion / Re: False Envy
« on: March 13, 2015, 16:10 »
Well, people only put the best stuff about their life on facebook or any social media place.

3
General Stock Discussion / Re: What sells, and what doesn't
« on: March 13, 2015, 10:53 »
If I run around snapping random whatever and upload for sale, does this random sort of fluff sell much worse than say images that I actually took some thought into making?

If you had asked this in 2004, you might have been in a position to snap "random whatever" and sell some, but not a prayer today. I doubt you'd even get accepted at the major sites (there are admissions tests for many).

Did someone tell you there was easy money in stock photography? If so, go back and tell them they're an idiot :)

No, nobody told me there was easy money.  I sell in the top 4 stock places, however, the stuff I sell is randomly shot because stock is not my main business.  I don't shoot stuff in the studio, or hire models, I just carry my camera to places and snap stuff.   I have some images (and my portfolio is small, well, because I upload like 1-2 images a month) that sell very well, and some that don't sell at all. Since I don't have first hand experience with shooting strategically for stock sites, I wanted to find out from others what they think about random vs strategic shots.

4
General Stock Discussion / Re: What sells, and what doesn't
« on: March 13, 2015, 10:41 »
For what would the buyers use your random shots? If they don't fit a buyers need they won't sell.
Right, but what I mean by random is stuff is, you walk around, say, in a farmers' market. You snap a few pics of this and that, and anything that seemed interesting to you at that moment, and then you pick out the best or most useful shots  for stock. Although you shoot random stuff, but you don't upload randomly, you choose shots that, A) have hight chance of  acceptance, and B) that you think might sell.

5
General Stock Discussion / Re: Slavery
« on: March 12, 2015, 17:58 »
If you're lively hood depends on it, maybe.  For me stock has been secondary. I submit maybe 2 images a month. Pays for my daily coffee.

6
General Stock Discussion / What sells, and what doesn't
« on: March 12, 2015, 17:55 »
I know this is a million dollar question, but more specifically what I would like to know is this:
If I run around snapping random whatever and upload for sale, does this random sort of fluff sell much worse than say images that I actually took some thought into making?

7
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Whats going on with iStock?
« on: March 11, 2015, 13:07 »
If I'm not the only one noticing this unexplained phenomenon of "low-to-no-activity" on iStock, then how come on this very forum iStock is showing second with 32.3 rating?

8
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Whats going on with iStock?
« on: March 11, 2015, 12:27 »
Maybe not discrimination, just no buyers there anymore?
I guess I'm being more sarcastic than serious in my verbage, but yes, something is happening. Is iStock losing buyers?

9
iStockPhoto.com / Whats going on with iStock?
« on: March 11, 2015, 12:04 »
I'm stock at iStock.  One view on the set of photos I uploaded 2 months ago?  Is this for real?  While the same photos are selling day by day on Fotolia and Dreamstime, iStock is stock at one view, and no sales.  Does anybody else experience such discrimination on iStock? 

10
My back of the hand calculation of my portfolio and knowledge about my friend's portfolio is that we both average about $0.50 per image per month. Thus 200 images might be the number your looking for. The 20/80 rule definitely holds. Most don't sell, but a few sell well.

Interesting, Thanks

11
I also have about 150 images on SS and earn over $200 a month (sometimes $300 with ELs) at SS alone. It all depends on your port. Some of mine sell every day, some sell twice a year. Take note of what sells and keep producing that type/category. I'm sure I get multiple sales from the same buyer when someone finds one of my images then has a look at my port and then buys a few more similar ones eg: interiors

yes that's the kind of predictability I'm talking about.  Once you realize what sells, you start producing more of what sells.  Sounds logical to me.  So it is not all a gamble, like some people seem to say.  You lose some on some images, and you win on others, but you always strive to increase your winning chances by building on successful stock.

12
I fell like some of you guys are beating around the bush.  The fact is, none of you would be in the microstock business if you did not anticipate how many images you would need to upload to make X, and what kind of images you need to upload to reach that goal.

I'm not talking about exceptions where one uploads 100 images and gets 0 sales because he has no clue what he's doing. I hope that's not the case, because if there are some folks who aren't making money from 100 images, they shouldn't be selling stock.  Selling stock is a business, and in any business model you make predictions, those predictions are based on what you already know about the industry, and practical side of business, based on those two factors you anticipate what you need to do to reach your highest potential. The usual suspects who claim microstock is like a blind-folded person throwing darts at a bulls eye, are blowing smoke.  Microstock is not art in the pure sense of being art.  It is about supply and demand rather than art, because it is not done for art's sake, its done to make money.  Sure, better quality stuff is in more demand, and I suppose those guys who already been with microstock long enough, know the gist; what sells, what to expect, what not to do, what has been overdone, where the shifts are happening.  In this sense nobody, who is actively pursing microstock, is doing it blind-folded.

So, since some folks like to speak for other people, I want to ask you, how many images did you upload to reach your first $100 a month goal?


13
You could always start making your own coffee. I have no idea how many images though. My guess would be 50-500.
If all else fails, then I agree, but the objective is to make residual income that is enough to cover expensive coffee habit.

14
Why do you think there is any useful answer to such a question?

It depends on your images - more needed if you aren't very good or shoot subjects that aren't in demand, fewer if you're a Yuri clone.

I think you would do better to focus on building a portfolio you are proud of and that might keep providing you income for a while

I think there should be an average. I understand there are good and bad exceptions. But in any business model, there is a forecast, growth model that you can look back and see.

15
I want my images to pay for my monthly coffee tab which is at about $100 a month.  Currently I'm a contributor at 4 top microstock places.  How many images do I need to have, between the 4 microstock agencies to start making $100 a month. Right now I only have about 50 images in each microstock. Sales are slow, well because I only have 50 images.

16
I've used a slightly modified version of the Getty release and had it accepted by all of the agencies who have seen it.  I'm told that Dreamstime has an issue with the standard Getty release due to its language about relying on the laws of the country with the nearest Getty office.  I changed that wording to refer only to US law.  I can give you a copy of my release if you're in the US or don't mind changing the wording to your home country.
That would be great. I'm in the US so that would work out perfectly for me

Thanks
Ben

17
General Stock Discussion / Re: I Think I'm Done
« on: July 15, 2013, 11:05 »
Eventually microstock sites will realize that they lost all good talent, while only amateurs are left to contribute.  This will make them rethink their contribution payout model. I have been with microstock for some time, but my portfolio is very small, because microstock has never been my focus.  It pays for my daily coffee habits, but I've been long enough with microstock to see overtime how they have evolved. Fotolia is the worst in terms of algorithm experiments.  I can't tell you number of times they would tweak it causing some of my images go from 1 page to 300 page on specific search terms.  Where you are with specific search terms matters as much as contributor rate. 

18
Is there a one model release form out there that can be used with istock, dreamstime, shutterstock, fotolia and depositphotos? I really dislike the idea of creating a model release form for every microstock I upload to.

Thank in advance

19
General Stock Discussion / Re: Hot microstock concepts for 2012
« on: November 20, 2012, 14:30 »
The people images, which are at the top of the food chain, will always be profitable because:
A) Fashions change - you can pretty much reshoot your most successfully sold photos of the decade with new clothes. 
B) Hair styles change - even if that business suit rarely changes, the hair styles change, so you still can reshoot that young business man.
C) Technology changes -  If you shot someone with an older laptop, ipad, or a phone, those things change and down the road you will need to reshoot those people holding newer tech toys.
D) Cameras change - new camera tech is higher MP. If you shot an image at 12mp before, well if you reshoot the same thing at 36mp, it might gain you new traction as the demand for higher resolution image takes its toll.

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors